Broader information disclosure.
Not exact matches
Denson said the NDA — which prohibited the
disclosure of
information about Trump and his family — was too
broad, vague, and violated public policy.
That means that no action by the Legislature on Cuomo's proposal will result in even
broader disclosure of the teacher - evaluation
information.
If you are a California resident and wish to request
information about how to exercise your third party
disclosure choices, please send a request by email to the Privacy Administrator at [email protected] or by postal mail to Harmonix Music Systems, Inc., 40
Broad Street, Floor 7, Boston, MA 02109, Attn: Your California Privacy Rights, c / o Privacy Administrator.
Rules about full
disclosure by the agency of
information as between them and the parents bear no relation to the duties of full relevant
disclosure with which most family lawyers are familiar; and this case shows the workings of the scheme with tribunal proceedings, by which stage, it might be thought, agency rules about
disclosure would be relatively
broad.
This
broad and far reaching provision includes
disclosure to a spouse or family member,
information that is publicly known, and
information that does not mention or otherwise identify the client.
Lists of Documents and Examinations for Discovery facilitate and require
broad and comprehensive
disclosure, and typical family litigation will result in the parties exchanging very sensitive
information and documents.
ESSA gives the Boards
broader authority to disclose confidential
information by making significant amendments to the Accord Acts and COGOA provisions governing
disclosure of
information submitted to them.
We prohibit the use of
broad or blanket authorizations requesting the use or
disclosure of protected health
information for a wide range of unspecified purposes.
Response: We do not accept the commenter's
broad recommendation to apply the regulation only to the «
disclosure» of protected health
information and not to «use» of such
information.
One commenter argued that the permissible
disclosure of protected health
information to carry out treatment is too
broad for health plans and that health plans that have no responsibility for treatment or care coordination should have no authority to release health
information without authorization for treatment purposes.
Response: Again, we agree that the NPRM's provision allowing
disclosure of the protected health
information of intelligence community employees without authorization was overly
broad.
Comment: A number of the comments called for the elimination of all permissible
disclosures without authorization, and some specifically cited the public health section and its liberal definition of public health authority as an inappropriately
broad loophole that would allow unfettered access to private medical
information by various government authorities.
We also believe that, on balance, individuals» interest in having
broad access to this
information outweighs concerns about the rare instances in which providing this
information might raise concerns about harm to the person who made the
disclosure.
Because the term «banking» may take on
broader meaning in light of these changes, the commenter recommended modifying the proposed rule to state that
disclosure of diagnostic and treatment
information to banks along with payment
information would constitute a violation of the rule.
Comments: A few commenters opposed the NPRM's provisions regarding protected health
information of intelligence community employees and their dependents being considered for postings overseas, on the grounds that the scope of permissible
disclosure without authorization was too
broad.
Further, the
disclosure is being made to counsel who can protect the
information from
broader disclosure if privilege is found to exist.
Woods»
broader view is the ECJ ruling could have serious implications for big data business models in general if companies are relying on similarly indiscriminate access to
information as government intelligence agencies were revealed to have been by the Snowden
disclosures.
An interim injunction that prohibited employment with new employers and required the return of confidential
information and
disclosure of contact with customers of former employers, was deemed too
broad.