Sentences with phrase «brokerage filed a lawsuit»

The brokerage filed a lawsuit, arguing that the salesperson violated the terms of the brokerage policy manual by claiming the full commissions and also that he misrepresented the work he did on certain transactions.
The brokerage filed a lawsuit against the owner, alleging that the expectation of the parties had been that the agreements would continue until 2046 and that the owner had acted in bad faith by replacing the existing lease with a new agreement between it and the subtenant.
The brokerage filed a lawsuit against the owners, seeking commission payment on both the remaining rental amounts and a commission from the sale of the property, claiming that the settlement amounted to an exercise of the purchase option contained in the lease.
When the seller refused to pay commission, the brokerage filed a lawsuit, arguing that sellers could always deny commissions to brokers simply by including contingencies that extend beyond the listing protection period.
Eventually, the Salesperson and the Brokerage filed a lawsuit against the seller.
Following the favorable ruling, the Brokerage filed a lawsuit seeking indemnification from the Sellers for the costs incurred in defending itself against the buyer's lawsuit.
When the Sellers refused to pay the Brokerage its commission from the sale, the Brokerage filed a lawsuit.
The Brokerage filed a lawsuit seeking to enforce the terms of the promissory note.

Not exact matches

The Rhodes Team («Rhodes»), a Texas brokerage firm, filed a defamation lawsuit against a Yelp!
A brokerage firm filed a Yelp lawsuit against an unknown reviewer.
Having already suffered a cost on the reputational - front this year, Coinbase now looks set to encounter substantial financial costs, for the world - leading crypto asset brokerage will need to pay lawyers as they prepare for not one, but two class action lawsuits filed against them over the past two days.
As part of those duties, the receiver filed a lawsuit against the brokerage to recover its commissions from the sale of the two properties.
Gordon filed a lawsuit against the brokerage and its owner, alleging that the company was negligent for placing the «For Sale» sign on the wrong property.
The buyer filed a lawsuit against the salespeople and the brokerage under the state's Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
The Salesperson then filed a lawsuit seeking damages for an alleged sexually hostile work environment in violation of Title VII and also for alleged retaliation by the Brokerage because she had complained about sexual harassment.
The Brokerage filed a motion to dismiss the Salesperson's lawsuit, arguing that the Brokerage was not subject to Title VII because it did not have 15 employees and also the Salesperson was an independent contractor, not an employee.
The Buyer filed a lawsuit against the Banks, the brokerage, and the real property owner.
The Web site publisher filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the state's real estate license law, which required anyone providing brokerage services to hold a real estate license.
When the Buyer later discovered that the Property was significantly less than 15,000 square feet, he filed a lawsuit against the Brokerage and the Listing Broker alleging misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary duty.
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company («Company») filed a separate action seeking a declaratory judgment that it had no duty provide insurance coverage to the Brokerage in the Buyers» lawsuit.
The Investor filed a lawsuit against the Broker, the Salesperson, the Brokerage, and eCounty alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud.
The Owners filed a lawsuit against the Brokerage, alleging misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty.
In 2007, the Buyer filed a lawsuit alleging that the Seller and the Brokerage had misrepresented the property in its materials, as the ads had represented that one could hear a waterfall on the property when instead «all one could hear was the sound of dying and tortured animals [i.e., the tree frogs]» and also the neighborhood allegedly had social problems.
First Realty, Ltd. («Brokerage») filed a claim with its insurance carrier, Frontier Insurance Company («Insurer»), based on a lawsuit naming the Brokerage alleging that...
A California appellate court has considered whether a lower court properly dismissed a class action lawsuit filed against real estate brokerage firms over their collection of a «document preparation fee» in addition to their commission amount.
In 2001, the Buyer filed a lawsuit against the Sellers and the Brokerage, claiming that they had misrepresented and concealed material facts about the flooding problem on the property.
The Commissioner made a demand for payment, and eventually the Commissioner filed a lawsuit against the Brokerage on behalf of the Licensees for the unpaid commissions.
In 2002, the Buyers filed a lawsuit against the Brokerage and the Salesperson.
The Lender then filed a lawsuit seeking a judicial declaration that it was entitled to receive the escrow funds and the Brokerage was required to release its lien.
The Brokerage had purchased a real estate liability insurance policy («Policy») from the Company, which was in effect when the Buyers filed their initial lawsuit against the Brokerage.
Last year, Prudential Real Estate said it received $ 1.9 million from Mason McDuffie Real Estate Inc. to settle a breach of contract lawsuit Prudential Real Estate filed against the Pleasanton, Calif. - based brokerage after it switched its franchise affiliation to Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate.
The Buyers filed a lawsuit against the Brokerage alleging fraud, claiming that they were damaged by the Brokerage's failure to inform them of the square footage difference and also the Brokerage's failure to give them a copy of the appraisal for the property prior to closing.
The Buyer filed a lawsuit against the Broker and the Brokerage, alleging misrepresentation.
The Buyers filed a lawsuit against the Brokerage and the Broker personally, alleging violations of the federal Fair Housing Act («Act»).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z