A jury returned a verdict in favor of the Hellers on all allegations, and Marozzi and
the brokerage filed a motion with the court asking the judge to set aside the verdict.
The Brokerage filed a motion to dismiss the Salesperson's lawsuit, arguing that the Brokerage was not subject to Title VII because it did not have 15 employees and also the Salesperson was an independent contractor, not an employee.
The Brokerage filed a motion seeking to enforce the mediation agreement as interpreted by the mediator.
A jury returned a verdict in favor of the Buyers on all allegations, and the Salesperson and
Brokerage filed a motion with the court asking the judge to set aside the verdict.
Not exact matches
UPDATE: Legislators also
filed their own
motion to quash Moreland Commission subpoenas, in which they asserted the investigative panel has probed a coffee shop, the Monroe County Republican Committee and sought tenant information from legislator's real estate enterprise as well as information on the 140,000 clients of a
brokerage firm where a legislator works.
The Association and MLS
filed a
motion to dismiss, arguing that the supervising broker remained the owner of another
brokerage firm that was a member of the Association and so the Brokerage was ineligible for non-REALTOR ® parti
brokerage firm that was a member of the Association and so the
Brokerage was ineligible for non-REALTOR ® parti
Brokerage was ineligible for non-REALTOR ® participation.
When the Association and MLS had
filed a
motion for judgment, the
Brokerage had sought leave to
file an amended complaint seeking a declaratory judgment.
The Salespeople
filed a
motion seeking judgment in their favor, arguing that the
Brokerage could not establish that they were independent contractors under the state independent contractor statute.
9 DOS 94 Matter of DOS v. Shane -
motion for pre-hearing discovery beyond SAPA 401 (6) is denied; rules re: subpoenas in administrative proceedings reiterated; proper procedure of reserving right to
file post-hearing memorandum of law; MLS form listing agreements are acceptable; individual license not sufficient to allow acting as representative of corporate licensee - need affiliated license; agreements procured by individual acting under name of firm but without affiliated license are illegal and unenforceable - no
brokerage fee can be claimed; misrepresentation and execution of unauthorized extension; misrepresentation of law (distinction between canceling agency authority and abiding contract rights); RPL § 443 controls the disclosures required of licensees; subsequently licensed corporation not vicariously liable; failure to provide copy of agreement (19 NYCRR 175.12); inadvertence considered in determining penalty