As a result of this updating of
the business records exception at common law, the Evidence Acts of Alberta and Newfoundland & Labrador still do not contain a business records exception to the hearsay rule.
He demonstrates, with case citations, that American courts have largely failed to recognize the risk posed by admitting out of court «statements» made by computers, often by utilizing
the business records exception in a manner treats computer - generated as far more reliable than they deserve to be treated given the commonplace challenges in processing data: «Just because businesses rely on faulty computer programs does not necessarily mean that courts should follow suit.»
Terranova also argued the records are inadmissible as hearsay because the raw data was entered by surveyors who did not testify to its accuracy, and the Court rejects this argument on
the business records exception to the hearsay rule (at para 49).
(There is also much discussion of
the business records exception to the hearsay rule, both statutory and at common law.
How about the «database as real evidence» argument (so not documentary evidence, so not hearsay — so don't even need
the business records exception... it's all just mechanically recorded, like the counter in a turnstile as evidence of the number of people who entered an auditorium)?
Attorney Declaration Suffices For Fee Substantiation At State Court Level, Surmounting Hearsay Objection Based On
Business Records Exception.
In addition, the court found that neither the «official records exception» nor the «
business records exception» to the hearsay rule applied.
Not exact matches
The increased prison terms for Canadian nationals including officers and directors of Canadian corporations, the elimination of territorial jurisdiction test by explicitly providing for a «nationality» test, the increased risk exposure to CFPOA penalties by adding a books and
records provision, and the elimination of
exceptions and defences such as those for facilitation payments and
businesses not earning profits, all point towards continuing vigorous enforcement by the Canadian government of the CFPOA.
I clicked on the «Settled Principles» tab to find 30 well - settled principles for public
records, such as this statement from a California appellate decision, «[I] t is well established that the media has no greater right of access to public
records than the general public,» and this from a Florida court, «It is well - settled that public
records and reports or
business records are admissible as an
exception to the hearsay rule provided they are authenticated by a custodian.»
In particular, she spoke about the circumstances under which the Ontario Evidence Act makes an
exception to the normal rules regarding hearsay evidence when considering
business records.
Also raised in these articles but not in the decision, is the out - lived validity of the theory upon which
business record provisions such as s. 42 BCEA, (and s. 35 OEA, and s. 30 CEA), are based, that
business records warrant an
exception to the rule against hearsay evidence because the profit motive is a sufficient guarantee of the accuracy of
record - keeping.
R. 348 (H.L.), wherein the House of Lords held that the available hearsay
exception as to
business records was not adequate to admit
records concerning serial numbers of manufactured automobiles without the evidence of the person who was the maker of those
records, and that any needed alteration of the law would require new legislation.
In Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada instead followed the dissenting decision in Myers, thus allowing the Court to revise the hearsay rule
exception for
business records at common law: Ares v. Venner, [1970] SCR 608, 14 D.L.R. (3d) 4, 12 C.R.N.S. 349.