@Bill I think that much of the «skewed hyper seexualization of the modern culture» is a backlash against the skewed, hyper demonization of s.ex
by religious groups for hundreds of years, most especially by puritan groups in America.
Even Islamic leaders in Pakistan offered their support to Masih, whose case has intensified demands
by religious groups for the Pakistani government to reform the law.
Not exact matches
This is the 10th edition of the report hailed as the «Bible
for socially progressive foundations,
religious groups, pension funds, and tax - exempt organizations»
by the Chicago Tribune.
401 (k) plans are generally offered
by for - profit companies, while 403 (b) plans are generally offered
by non-profit entities,
religious groups, school districts and governmental organizations.
By Vivienne Foley, CNN New York (CNN)- Pastors and their congregants took to the streets of New York on Thursday to protest and to pray
for Mayor Michael Bloomberg to reverse a ban on
religious groups» use of public schools
for worship service, scheduled to go into effect February 12.
By analog, If a
religious group holds an event or service at a hotel or convention centre, in return
for its paying a fee, should one then think that the hotel or convention centre is «promoting that brand of religion»?
Let's not forget what and how America was suposedly started as a place of relgious freedom
by the pilgrams (according to so called american history books) these
religious people proceeded to rob & kill the Indians who saved their lives, take & kill Mexicans
for land & gold & oil enslave a whole
group of people as property
for financial gain all under the guise of being good «Christians» (WHITE) and now perceive all «Muslims» (NON-WHITE) are evil unless proven otherwise.
A different result should obtain if the city were to give preference to
religious uses, or waive the fee
for use of the facility
by a
religious group, but that does not seem to be the case here.
Probably a slightly more likely scenario with a political campus
group than a
religious one (as we can see
by Democrats who voted
for Santorum in open primary states, because they thought he would be more likely to lose to Obama), but who knows?
An atheist student
group could be taken over
by religious students
for example.
Do they really imagine that an atheist wants to join their
religious group, hide his / her real beliefs
for months or years, get themselves elected
by other members then radically change the whole nature of the club, against all the other member's wishes?
The bishops are distancing themselves from Catholic
groups that have expressed satisfaction with the «accommodation» offered to them
by the president: Sister Carol Keehan of the Catholic Health Association,
for instance, told reporters she was «pleased and grateful that the
religious liberty and conscience protection needs of so many ministries that serve our country were appreciated enough that an early resolution of this issue was accomplished.»
The American Center
for Law and Justice - a
group «specifically dedicated to the ideal that
religious freedom and freedom of speech are inalienable, God - given rights» - was asked
by the pastor's lawyers last year to help publicize Nadarkhani's case, according to Jodran Sekulow, executive director of the
group.
The Leadership Conference of Women
Religious, initially surprised
by the Vatican's report last month, «plans to move slowly, not rushing to judgment» when the
group's 21 - member board meets
for three days in Washington, D.C., beginning Tuesday.
That might change, as several bills have popped up in the US House of Representatives this year, aimed both at expediting the process
for religious groups threatened
by ISIS and at beefing up the screening of anyone from Iraq or Syria.
Wheaton administrators spent several months preparing
for a 2006 visit from Soulforce, a
group aiming to change
religious leaders» minds on gay issues that was co-founded
by Mel White, who was a ghost writer
for some evangelical leaders, including Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell.
In an effort to address concerns of
religious groups that self - insure, the new rules suggest creating «an exemption
for group health plans established or maintained
by certain
religious employers.»
The fact that AA depends neither on
religious thrill (as evidenced,
for example,
by the lack of
group singing), nor on a «hot flash» type of
religious experience, makes
for a more stable sobriety.
Eighty - eight percent of those contacted
by pollsters agreed that «America was founded on the idea of
religious freedom
for everyone, including
religious groups that are unpopular.»
The practice of the networks was to produce
religious programs, either
by making production facilities, technical services and some budget resources available to the
religious groups for the production of their own programs, or
by using these
religious agencies as consultants on their own
religious programs.
For that reason only we find now the ruling powers are in the hands of secular non
religious ones... The conference above stated that the secular regimes in the West had used the indifference between religions, branches, doctrines
by creating «Fitnah» said to be harder than killing... because you get all those with Fitnah to fight among them selves... beside establishing and supporting terrorist
groups to get the area unstable far from investment and development environment that has caused the mass immigration of the capital heads, professions and skilled labour hands from their countries to the west and be treated as garbage at countries that they do not belong to whether as culture, race or religion....
In most cases they have overcome both political fragmentation and government overload
by replacing their old governmental bureaucracies with an innovative and effective form of governance: coalitions (composed of business, government, nonprofits, universities, neighborhood and minority associations, and
religious groups) that develop a cooperative agenda to improve the city and that assume many of the city government's traditional functions (economic development, long - term planning, educational reform, even care of the homeless), and that also operate like political parties of yore (providing the point of access
for new
groups and a public realm
for discourse, debate, and negotiation concerning matters of the common good).
No less than other stories in the Jacob cycle, it reflects the background of the patriarchal age — frictions between
groups (Hamor and Jacob); a level of sexual morality beyond the reach of our judgment and in any judgment ennobled
by the integrity of Hamor and the love of his son
for Dinah; the effort on the part of both families to effect a peaceful settlement honoring the
religious sensibilities of the abused; the despicable violation of the terms of agreement
by two of Jacob's sons; and finally, in perfect consonance with the general character of Jacob, his sharp rebuke of his sons not on moral but on utilitarian grounds:
The need
for an opportunity to periodically renew basic trust is satisfied
by religious groups through corporate worship, symbolic practices, sacraments, and festivals.
The basic need
for a sense of belonging is provided
by meaningful involvement in
religious groups.
He is also the author of two books on
religious architecture: Architecture
for the Gods and Architecture
for the Gods, Book II, published
by Images Publishing
Group.
Rational choice is a presupposition of another sociological model embraced
by Stark: the «theory of
religious economies,» which posits that churches and other
religious groups operate in a market in which they must compete
for adherents.
One frequently cited bar graph has been used to suggest,
for the decade 1965 - 75, a severe diminution of seven mainline Protestant bodies
by contrast both with their gains in the preceding ten years and with the continuing growth of selected conservative churches (see Jackson W. Carroll et al., Religion in America, 1950 to the Present [Harper & Row, 19791, p. 15) The gap in growth rates
for 1965 - 75, as shown on that graph, is more than 29 percentage points (an average loss in the oldline denominations of 8.9 per cent against average gains among the conservatives of 20.5 per cent) This is indeed a substantial difference, but it does not approach the difference in growth rates recorded
for the same
religious groups in the 1930s, when the discrepancy amounted to 62 percentage points.
The opportunities
for religious reform movements to achieve their goals were largely determined, therefore,
by the relations present among the state, state church, and other powerful interest
groups.
The United States Commission on International
Religious Freedom, an independent advisory group appointed by the president and Congress to monitor religious freedom around the world, Wednesday expressed «deep concern» for Nadarkhani, the head of a network of Christian house churches
Religious Freedom, an independent advisory
group appointed
by the president and Congress to monitor
religious freedom around the world, Wednesday expressed «deep concern» for Nadarkhani, the head of a network of Christian house churches
religious freedom around the world, Wednesday expressed «deep concern»
for Nadarkhani, the head of a network of Christian house churches in Iran.
Burleigh builds a conclusive case that those most responsible
for paving the way
for Auschwitz were not Christians reading and preaching the gospel but instead were atheists, apostates, and revolutionaries who promoted a «hatred against the Lord and His Christ nourished
by groups subversive to any
religious and social order,» as the papal encyclical Dilectissima Nobis (1933) put it.
While the character of certain movements and
groups is to a large extent defined
by sociological criteria, such as the earlier so - called Frontier religion or now the Buchmean (Oxford
group) Movement, which Allan Eister has recently analyzed in his book Drawing Room Conversion, we find that the more definitely a
religious group is a
religious group — as distinct from an economic, political, or cultural association — the more important, both
for members of the
group and students of it, will become its worship and its theology.
Some
religious groups may choose to in - crease their collaboration with government and even compete
for public funds; others may determine they are uncomfortable with government funding despite the new protections afforded
by Charitable Choice.
If we measure left and right
by support
for or opposition to abortion and Bill Clinton, which is a reasonable measure in this case, twelve of the
groups represented are very far left indeed — including Catholics
for a Free Choice, Human Rights Campaign (a leading gay rights organization), People
for the American Way, AIDS National Interfaith Network, and
Religious Coalition
for Reproductive Choice.
For many
groups, these numbers provide a fairly accurate county -
by - county picture, but to the extent that a
group provided sketchy data (lots of round numbers always raise questions) or no data at all, these «adherent» numbers fail to reflect the actual
religious composition of a given area.
While these ideas are not necessarily being mentioned
by the author, his failure to understand that dogma and intolerance are the simultaneous catalyst not only
for the injustices committed
by «
religious»
groups, but also
for the exodus away from those same
groups by the thinking people who just can not conscientiously go along with their craziness.
One who is born,
for example, into a Christian
group which teaches the doctrine of perfection may be expected to interpret a decisive
religious experience as the granting of perfect love
by the Holy Spirit.
sent out
for aid nearly always of
religious notations of some sort (provided to you
by group «X») or («serving God through mission»).
Part of the reason
for the takeover of
religious television
by conservative, paid - time
religious broadcasters has been the changes that have occurred in American
religious culture, changes that have reduced the power of those broadcasters who represent the mainline denominations while increasing the power of those representing the conservative denominations and
groups.
A recent PRRI / RNS poll reveals that white evangelicals support a Mormon presidential candidate over Obama
by an overwhelming 49 % margin, but are simultaneously the
religious group most likely to say it is important
for a presidential candidate to share their
religious beliefs (67 %).
«
For myself, the shock made me numb at first, and then I was profoundly sad that my life as a woman
religious and my commitment to serving the poor would be so denigrated
by the leadership of our church,» says Sister Simone Campbell, who heads NETWORK, a liberal advocacy
group in Washington.
In 1975 there appeared in Germany a book entitled: The Berlin Ecumenical Manifesto, on the Utopian Vision of the World Council of Churches, edited
by Walter Kunneth and Peter Beyerhaus.34 The book attacked not only the World Council of Churches but also the Lutheran World Federation, World Student Christian Federation, certain Roman Catholic
groups, the German Evangelical Kirchentag, Taize, and to some extent even Lausanne.35 According to H. Berkof, the common thread through all the articles in the book was the desire to demonstrate that the World Council of Churches no longer sought to proclaim the Gospel throughout the world, but strove rather
for a purely horizontal, social and political, humanization and unification of mankind
by means of
religious pluralism and syncretism.
«Respect
for religious freedom deteriorated» in Afghanistan during the period covered
by the report, «particularly toward Christian
groups and individuals,» the State Department said.
Religious liberty has very quickly become of intense concern for religious groups across the country, especially for those that will be directly affected by the HHS
Religious liberty has very quickly become of intense concern
for religious groups across the country, especially for those that will be directly affected by the HHS
religious groups across the country, especially
for those that will be directly affected
by the HHS mandate.
Religion News Service: Nuns on the Bus meet Tea Party protests in Ohio The «Nuns on the Bus» have been a consistently popular and effective faith - based tool
for religious progressives this campaign season, but on Monday a
group of demonstrators apparently organized
by a local Tea Party affiliate met the nuns at a stop in Marietta, Ohio, and provided a far different welcome than the sisters usually receive.
In order to resist this pressure, several
religious alternatives
for affirming one's Jewishness were proposed
by such
groups as the Essenes, Sadducees, Pharisees, and Zealots.
One way of acknowledging its revisability is to say that it can survive the critique laid
for it
by Wayne Proudfoot in his 1985
Religious Experience and, more importantly,
by the postmodern culture
for which Proudfoot speaks.13 If it ignores that kind of postmodern critique, I am suggesting, it will not deliver on the promise it has shown recently in the growth of The American Journal of Theology and Philosophy, in the founding of The Highlands Institute
for American
Religious Thought, in the resurgence of Columbia and Yale forms of neonaturalism and pragmatism in the work of Robert Corrington and William Shea, 14 and in the American Academy of Religion
Group on Empiricism in American
Religious Thought — as well as in the growing independent scholarship of those working out of the empirical side of process theology and the Chicago school.
A denomination is a functional entity in which the issues of truth and tradition are laid aside so that a
religious group may conduct its activities in a setting characterized
by a lack of political or cultural dominance
for any one
group.
A
religious approach is the time - tested way of satisfying what Erich Fromm has called the universal human need
for a «system of thought and action shared
by a
group which gives the individual a frame of orientation and an object of devotion.»
When the requirements of participation and the definitions of life situations that are promulgated
by these
groups are not seriously challenged, middle - class
religious institutions are no match
for them.