By atheist standards, that's a load of BS.
Not exact matches
You're just parroting the kind of
standard eighth grade
atheist questions that are answered
by reading any number of excellent authors.
Oh, don't be taken aback
by the
atheists «uncivil need to lash out and throw daggers» on this forum, it's pretty much
standard fare
It is my respect for other Christians that I don't use the same term to describe myself, though I wouldn't call myself Agnostic or
Atheist by the same
standard.
nothing makes the
atheist more ticked off more than when you bring up GOD... God gets all the blame for all the tragedy in the world... If there wasnt a god in the first place, humans would not know tragedy or injustice when we see it... it would be a non-issue to us... survival of the fittest would not permit the emotions of love, compassion, empathy... Darwininian theory could not allow any of those and many other of the best of people's capacity for caring to surface... You cant explain it away
by synapse or neurons... without a Supreme Being, there would be no sense of justice or injustice, we would not call it anything because there is no Ultimate Moral
Standard to compare it.
I have no proof you are real.I can not physically see you therefor
by the
standards of many
atheists, you do not exist.
To take one example you cited, Einstein, he was a complete
atheist by any
standard.
Why would a given person who is an
atheist and
by his own
standards a «good» person choose to love his enemy and forgive those who persecute him?
That's a terminology issue, but your husband
by most
atheist standards would be seen as an extremist.
In the
atheist world view their can be no absolute
standard of morality for there is no absolute
standard to measure morality
by.