I think the worst mistake was the labeling of
C02 as a pollutant; this one move awakened the public to the kind of subterfuge being used by the Green Movement and has done a lot of damage to it.
Not exact matches
Ethanol reduces
c02 slightly but burns with a lot more polluting solids
as found by testing recently, it also clogs motors and catalyic converters and produces nitros oxide which is a lot worse and that is smog, more lies,
c02 is essential for every living thing on the planet not a
pollutant.
Referring to
C02 as a «
pollutant» or «poisoning the atmosphere» with
C02 is patently ridiculous; but unfortunately such statements are common in our culture of global - warming scare - mongering.
C02 levels
as a lagging indicator across known geological history really forms one of the more formidable objections to the
C02 as a «greenhouse
pollutant» model.
Arguing that it is a priority for USEPA to regulate
C02 as a critical
pollutant is one of the tactical ideas that I've been seeing pushed heavily in the blogo - sphere and somewhat in op eds.