A simpler and easier explanation is that disconnecting prioritizing school expenditures at a local level from local revenue generation when Prop 13 became a statewide property tax is the main reason for the decline in
CA public education spending.
Not exact matches
As economic satisfaction increases, «consumers are more comfortable
spending and confident they
can manage any new debt,» said Rod Griffin, Experian's director of
public education.
As Fraser Nelson writes: «If
spending can be more than doubled with little or not effect on services (some, like
education, have grown worse) why should [the
public] believe that cuts should be so damaging?»
The current state law says that towns, under the state's so - called «minimum budget requirement,»
can not
spend less money on
public education than was
spent during the previous year — unless special circumstances such as a sudden drop in enrollment or other problems.
«The Cartel» really took on the notion that
public education in America operates solely and purposefully «for the kids,» and it showed exactly what
can go wrong when you are consistently first or second in school
spending every year (as New Jersey is) and lots of interest groups have placed the economic advancement and security of the adults above the kids.
I'm actually going to
spend my time with you kinda thinking through a different set of ideas that I think are cool in an entirely other way, in terms of how we
can begin to think about making real changes in
public education.
Coverdell ESA funds
can be
spent on K - 12 or higher
education, whether
public or private schools.
With an ESA, parents receive 90 percent of what would have been
spent on their child in the
public school into a restricted - use savings account, and
can then use those funds to pay for private school tuition, online learning, special
education services and therapies, textbooks, tuition, and other
education - related services, products, and providers.
Ongoing
public debate about whether the United States, specific states, and local communities
spend too much or too little on
education and whether those dollars are
spent correctly
can be traced through the case law history associated with various school finance law suits.
ESAs place the money that would normally be
spent on a child in
public school into an account monitored by the government, which parents
can use to pay for alternative forms of
education.
... so the 1 %, who are pulling ALL of the CCSS and RTTT strings, and their lackeys in Washington and state capitals across the land
can grab all of those billions and billions of
public dollars
spent on
public education AND PRIVATIZE AMERICA»S SCHOOLS.
Maxine Sweet, vice president for
public education at Experian, said in a statement: «We want consumers to understand that
spending at the holidays or at any other time of the year
can often have broader implications to their overall fiscal fitness.
The millions of dollars we
spend on
public legal
education produces correspondingly valuable resources, without a doubt, but those resources
can not equip litigants to comfortably and competently manage the system — especially those unable to devote themselves to the full - time study of legal processes, those whose first language is not English or French, or those with cognitive or functional impairments — and, as a result, whenever we talk about litigants without counsel, the conversation inevitably veers toward the delays, costs and other inconveniences such litigants impose on court and counsel.