Sentences with phrase «cara deangelis»

CARA only retains an identifier tied to a thumbnail image and a list of cases.

The legal research company is offering free access to its full suite of premium tools, including CARA, for litigators fighting for civil rights and civil liberties.

Soon, CARA will probably be included in Casetext's Pro-level features, which currently start at a not - for - everyone $ 149 / user / month.

The standard way to use CARA is for an attorney who has received a brief, memoranda or other legal document to upload it to CARA, and CARA then performs its analysis and generates a list of relevant cases that are not mentioned in the document.

With Casetext CARA, for example, you can toss a brief in the virtual hopper and get back a list of cases that are relevant but not cited — the ones your opponent couldn't distinguish or (on a draft, we hope) the ones you missed in your first round of research.

That honor goes to Casetext's CARA, which the American Association of Law Libraries selected as its 2017 new product of the year.

Recent years» winners have include Casetext's CARA in 2017, Ravel Law in 2016, Lex Machina in 2015, and a joint award in 2014 to Fastcase and William S. Hein & Co. for the HeinOnline / Fastcase Integration.

If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, then Casetext was clearly on to something with its CARA brief - analysis software.

I recently posted a video here showing a face - off between CARA from Casetext and EVA from ROSS.

In addition, CARA requires a paid subscription and Clerk so far works only for California cases.

CARA clearly came out on top due to its ability to instantly surface information and documents (cases, briefs, case summaries and more) that are highly relevant to the issues the researcher is working on.

In the red corner was Andrew Arruda, the well - known AI advocate and co-founder of ROSS Intelligence, better known for its legal research tool, but which had just announced the arrival of EVA, a system that appeared to have some similar capabilities to Casetext's CARA application.

I guess Casetext's CARA is really geared towards that.

Comparisons will inevitably be made between Judicata's Clerk and CARA, the brief - analysis tool introduced last year by Casetext that finds cases that are relevant to a legal document but not cited in it.

However, Clerk goes well beyond CARA, not only identifying missing cases but also analyzing the strength of a brief's citations and arguments in granular detail and suggesting ways to improve them.

After hearing about EVA, the folks at Casetext — who have their own brief analyzer, CARA — challenged ROSS to participate in a «robot fight» here at Legaltech / Legalweek in New York, where both companies are participating.

Its award - winning technology combining both conventional search functionality and our CARA A.I. powered contextual search, which focuses your results to help you find on - point authorities faster.

Additionally, we're planning to build out our sales and marketing teams so that we can make sure all litigators have an opportunity to leverage CARA in their litigation.

The Casetext team has continued growing since then, and built high - powered, data - science - backed research tools, such as the Heatmap, Key Passages, and, most notably, CARA.

Take a rough draft of a brief you've written, or even the final product, and load it into CARA to see what other cases it finds — and you missed.

As I explained in a post here last summer, CARA — short for Case Analysis Research Assistant — is a tool that automatically finds cases that are relevant to legal memoranda and briefs.

This means that if you have a scanned version of a brief or document, you need to OCR it before uploading it to CARA.

Probably the best indication of how well your company will do is how well it's done in the past (although everything else is important, too, including team, vision, etc.) In our case, our investors were impressed by CARA's success — both the feat of engineering to make it possible, and the speed of adoption in the legal industry, including by some of the world's largest firms.

Now, with the roll - out of CARA, which Heller considers a marquee feature, Casetext is also preparing to introduce new paid subscriptions.

The new research tool being unveiled in a limited rollout today is called CARA, short for Case Analysis Research Assistant.

Feed it to CARA, and in just a few seconds it will spit out a list of cases that are relevant to the issue but that your opponent has left out.

Casetext CEO Jake Heller told me that because CARA looks for correlations between cases, it is less effective for cases less than a year old.

Second, CARA is now integrated into Casetext's standard legal research workflow, so that it can be used to enhance keyword queries and deliver results that are far - better matched to the facts and issues at hand.

The feature uses Casetext's legal research assistant CARA, an analytical tool that automatically finds cases that are -LSB-...]

I can assure you that executives at Thomson Reuters and LexisNexis would take issue with Lynn's statement that only Casetext has research powered by artificial intelligence, but the AI to which she refers is CARA, Casetext's Case Analysis Research Assistant.

Pro, a paid tier that would include full access to all Casetext features, including CARA as well as sentence - level case annotations, heatmap analytics, advanced case summaries, and more.

What CARA is actually doing is comparing the cases in the uploaded document to the cases and articles in its database.

Upload a brief, memorandum or any other document that contains legal text, and CARA analyzes it and generates a list of relevant cases that are not mentioned in the document.

Some older Word documents and heavily formatted briefs can trip - up CARA.

This week, it announced that this year's honoree will be Pablo Arredondo, vice president of legal research at Casetext, for his development of CARA.

When Casetext introduced CARA in 2016, it was the first product of its kind on the market.

This means that, in addition to finding relevant — but possibly overlooked — case law, CARA also finds relevant briefs.

CARA Brief Finder makes finding these invaluable resources effortless.»

CARA — short for Case Analysis Research Assistant — is an analytical tool that automatically finds cases that are relevant to a legal document but not cited in the document.

As I explained when it launched last July, CARA is an automated research assistant that finds cases relevant to legal memoranda and briefs.

Once you do, CARA analyzes the document and then contextualizes your query to the facts and legal arguments the document contains.

A big part of that focus, he said, will be on further developing CARA's AI technology to better address the pressures firms are facing.

Those anomalies aside, the CARA AI - assisted research tool strikes me as a major advance in legal research.

Casetext will use the new funding to further develop the capabilities of CARA and of its software platform overall, Heller told me.

Both updates involve Casetext's artificial - intelligence, brief - analysis software CARA (Case Analysis Research Assistant):

In my initial testing, the addition of CARA's AI to a query makes a powerful combination, delivering results that much more closely matched my facts and issues.

These experiments with non-litigation documents lead me to think that the CARA AI - assisted research tool works better with litigation documents because they contain more precise discussions of facts and issues.

Casetext is calling this new feature CARA Brief Finder.

The distinguishing feature of CARA is that it finds cases that you or your opponent missed, using artificial intelligence and data science technologies.

Access to CARA requires a Casetext subscription.