The appellant also argued that the trial judge should have extended
CAS wardship rather than make a Crown ward no access order.
Not exact matches
Waite LJ (at 287) said
wardship was unnecessary: «Rule 9.2 A (1)[now FPR 2010, r 16.6 (3)-RSB- gives C exactly the same rights in
wardship as she enjoys in proceedings under
CA 1989, Pt 2... If, therefore, the judge believed that
wardship provided a means of requiring C to accept a guardian ad litem, he was mistaken.
For children, this is most often found in the exercise of court powers in relation to care proceedings, but it
can also extend to
wardship proceedings (now being used in relation to children who are under threat from FGM (female genital mutilation) or being removed to live in Syria or other troubled countries).
CAS v. A.F. was yet another unsuccessful parent appeal of a Crown
wardship order, summarily dismissed.
A civil Court which consists of three divisions: - i) Queen's Bench (
can be known as King's Bench Division if a King is assuming the throne)- civil disputes for recovery of money, including breach of contract, personal injuries, libel / slander; ii) Family - concerned with matrimonial maters and proceedings relating to children, e.g.
wardship; iii) Chancery - property matters including fraud and bankruptcy
A list of support groups and services for people affected by
wardship, adoption and donor conception
can be found on the Victorian Department of Human Services website.