CHAD said in our first meetings, that he was willing to provide and help out a sugar baby, but he didn't like the idea of «paying» someone to hang out with him — which is what he felt an allowance was --(so no financial help).
chad said do NOT forget the talking donkey!
Not exact matches
Fiction can take itself very seriously too
chad, in it's content it can
say that it is all truth and divine, but if the beginning and end don't have a forward and appendix explaining it's proof, its research and so on, it's sort of hard to take it seriously, don't you agree?
Like I
said before
chad, if you're going to quote someone who is supporting your arguement, they become your words and its on you to defend them and not slink back to the ad populem fallacy of
saying smarter people than you have discussed it so it must be true.
What is it with the
Chads, the Russ», the truthfollowers, etc. and now this one that they can't read a response and consider what the other is
saying.
For his imaginary Jesus is different from
Chads imaginary Jesus, and indeed, there are 2 billion versions of Jesus on the planet, most of whom look at all the others and
say «you are not a real Christian!»
If you were a real Christian you would know Christs words speak for themselves and the fact that he didn't take the sword away and turn it into a pruning shear right then and there does not mean he was
saying «I mean all this stuff is for later after I come back and kill all the evil people and those who haven't accepted me as their savior so you won't have to fear anyone so you can finally give up your guns and weapons of war...» You disgust me
chad.
@hippypoet «i can
say such about jesus because
chad, if he was just walking around talking to himself mumbling people would have thought him insane» @
Chad «based on what?
i can
say such about jesus because
chad, if he was just walking around talking to himself mumbling people would have thought him insane.