Sentences with phrase «civ before»

Not exact matches

Moreover the iOS origin of Firaxis's latest title really shows when you play on PC, and the result is unacceptable for any gamer that has played a real Civ game before.

«Many handlers I know are getting their dogs vaccinated and waiting the two to four weeks for the booster before working any show,» said Scott Tritsch, DVM, of Georgetown, Ky., adding that he's currently dealing with a group of 39 presumably infected CIV dogs.

Dogs that should not be vaccinated for CIV or should be evaluated before an immunization include those suffering from or requiring medication to manage:

Because CIV is a relatively new virus, most dogs have not been exposed to it before.

Dogs with CIV are contagious before they appear sick.

So if you would like to know the status of the CIV vaccine and whether you should be giving it, why all breeding dogs should be tested for Burcellosis before each breeding, how seriously the Leishmaniasis outbreak threatens your dogs, or where you can find the latest recommendations for all vaccines, the answers were there.

Policy information: This program has written policies This program rescues Goldens and Golden mixes They adopt out of the service territory Requires a dog be returned if the owner can not keep it Takes ownership of a dog upon intake Requires a home visit before adoption approval Follows up with adopters after placement Dogs are observed and evaluated before adoption All dogs receive all vaccinations (Rabies, DHPP, CIV, Bordatella) before adoption.

Dogs may be contagious and spreading CIV even before they show symptoms of Illness, as well as up to four (4) weeks after becoming ill, even if they have recovered themselves.

Moreover, while positive PCR results mean that the dog probably is infected with CIV, negative PCR results may be falsely negative if the swabs were taken before or after the period of peak viral shedding.

If you've never played a Civilization game before, Civ 5 is a great spring board.

Best to have a chosen victory condition in mind, which squares well with your empire's unique abilities; it's more possible to change strategy on the fly in Civ 6 than before, but not so much that you can afford to squander settlers by building redundant cities.

That proof is to the criminal standard was confirmed in Mubarak; and by the time of Karoonian v CMEC [ie CSA]; Gibbons v CMEC [2012] EWCA Civ 1379, [2012] All ER (D) 316 (Oct) the Court of Appeal recorded (per Richards LJ): «The court must be satisfied to the criminal standard, on the basis of all the evidence before it, that there has been wilful refusal or culpable neglect.

Re A (a Minor)[2007] EWCA Civ 1383 and [2007] All ER (D) 376 (Dec) the court held that when considering whether or not to grant such leave, the welfare of the child is a relevant consideration but not paramount, but before the permission discretion can be triggered, the «change in circumstances» must be sufficient to «have a real prospect of success» of reversing the court approved care plan already in place.

In Karkut & Ors, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lewisham [2005] EWHC 354 Collins J said, following Webb v Bristol City Council [2001] EWHC Admin Civ 696, that the better course was to for a judge to consider granting interim relief before considering the issue of permission.

The new rules on budgets and sanctions nearly destroyed the reputation of our civil justice system for fairness with the disastrous Mitchell decision when # 506,000 of costs was disallowed from a budget because it was filed the day before the hearing, not seven days before (Mitchell MP v News Group Newspapers [2013] EWCA Civ 1537, [2014] 2 All ER 430).

As David Westcott QC persuasively argued before the Court of Appeal in Bermuda in Thomson v Thomson and Colonial Insurance Limited [2017] CA (Bda) 2 Civ, the adoption of a discount rate based on ILGS does not lead to a single claimant being «over-compensated».

Whether an employee's actions (or omissions) are sufficiently serious to constitute «gross misconduct» is based on the facts of each case, and in the case of Adesokan v Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited [2017] EWCA Civ 22 the question before the Court of Appeal was whether an employee's «gross negligence» equated to gross misconduct.

The claim had not been compromised as the judge had stated and so the judge had not been bound by BCT Software Solutions Ltd v C Brewer & Sons Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 393, [2003] All ER (D) 196 (Jul)-- where parties have settled on all issues save costs before a trial or where a trial is incomplete, the court should not, save in a reasonably obvious case, embark on making an order for costs because the court will have no proper basis of agreed or determined facts upon which to base its decision.

«The without prejudice rule does not apply to those passages in the witness statement,» said Framlington in Barnetson v Framlington Group Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 502, [2007] All ER (D) 429 (May), «because they refer to exchanges that took place before the commencement of litigation or any basis for potential litigation and, therefore, at a time when there was no dispute.»

In R (a child)(special guardianship order)[2006] EWCA Civ 1748, [2006] All ER (D) 299 (Dec) it held that where leave to apply is required, leave must be obtained before the applicant can make the substantive application or give the local authority notice of the intention to apply.

The last time this sort of issue came before the Court of Appeal was in Henry v News Group Newspapers [2013] EWCA Civ 19, [2013] 2 All ER 840 where the court granted relief against sanctions under the pre-April regime but warned that it would all be different after 1 April.

Lord Justice Scott Baker in Flaherty v National Greyhound Racing Club Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 1117, [2005] All ER (D) 70 (Sep) made clear that the court must firstly ascertain all the facts relevant to the suggestion of bias before deciding whether the test is met.

Just before the holiday period the Court of Appeal took the opportunity in Simmons v Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1039 of decreeing that from April the court would add 10 % to damages for personal injury, nuisance and defamation.

Amy was junior counsel in Ranson v Customer Systems plc [2012] EWCA Civ 841 (an employment dispute before the Court of Appeal regarding a claim for breach of contract, fiduciary duty and restrictive covenant).

On the other hand in cases such as Protectacoat Firthglow v Szilagyi [2009] EWCA Civ 98, [2009] All ER (D) 208 (Feb) the Court of Appeal took a broader approach and held that there was no need for the parties to have intended to deceive anyone before the written terms were overridden.

A case dating back to 1973 (Wachtel & Wachtel [1973] EWCA Civ 10, [1973] 1 All ER 829) referred to conduct as having to be gross and obvious before it should be considered by the court.

In Raglan Housing Association Ltd v Fairclough [2007] EWCA Civ 1087, [2007] All ER (D) 16 (Nov) the Court of Appeal upheld the first instance decision that the landlord could, in claiming possession on the basis of ground 14 of Sch 2 to the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988), rely on offences committed by the tenant in the locality of the dwelling - house even if though those offences occurred before the commencement of the tenancy.

Successfully represented STANDARD CHARTERED BANK in proceedings before the High Court and Court of Appeal in relation to a substantial demand guarantee dispute, which formed part of a US$ 130m contract for the supply of electricity in Bangladesh (Greenland Bank - v - AMEX [2008] EWCH 421 (CH) and [2009] EWCA Civ 14)

The Court Of Appeal today handed down judgment in the matter of Patrick v McKinley [2017] EWCA Civ 2068, one of the final appeals heard by Lord Lloyd - Jones before his promotion to the Supreme Court.

R (Buckinghamshire County Council) v Kingston - upon - Thames Royal London Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 457, [2012] PTSR 854 (High Court and Court of Appeal) Jonathan represented Buckinghamshire on a challenge to a lack of consultation before another local authority placed an individual in receipt of community care services in its area.

l When the case involves an allegation of serious fraud or dishonesty, generally conclusions on such issues ought to be reached at trial, caution ought to be exercised before giving summary judgment in a case of that nature (Wrexham Associated Football Club v Crucialmove Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 237, [2006] All ER (D) 199 (Mar)-RRB-.

SE (Mauritius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 2145: successful for respondent before Court of Appeal in resisting appeal concerning application of 276ADE (vi) and s. 117B NIAA.

The Queen (on the application of Adewunmi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 1253: successful for Secretary of State before Court of Appeal in joint appeals concerning rejection of Tier 4 (General) Student application and rejection / certification of human rights claim.

In Van Colle and another v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Police [2007] EWCA Civ 325, [2007] 3 All ER 122, Daniel Brougham had been employed at Giles Van Colle's optical practice as a technician / dispenser from September 1999 until just before Christmas 1999.

In R (Mahfouz) v GMC [2004] EWCA Civ 233, [2004] All ER (D) 114 (Mar), Lord Justice Carnwath said ``... it needs to be plainly understood that no public interest whatsoever is served by jeopardising the process before the GMC's Professional Conduct Committee».

One year of disapplication expiring in May 1998 would come to an end before, indeed years before, it was established that: (i) the absence of a transitional provision meant that there had been a breach of Community law principles (Marks & Spencer II, in July 2002); (ii) there was nonetheless at least the possibility of a period of disapplication (Grundig II, in September 2002); and (iii) contrary to the firmly expressed opinion of the commissioners, the claims fell within reg 29 (University of Sussex v Customs and Excise Commissioners [2003] EWCA Civ 1448, [2004] STC 1, in October 2003).

Her ladyship referred to the case of Axa General Insurance Ltd v Gottlieb and Gottlieb [2005] EWCA Civ 112, [2005] 1 All ER (Comm) 445 and acknowledged that there was a well established common law rule that if a genuine claim made under an insurance contract is dishonestly exaggerated, the whole claim will be dismissed; further, if money has already been paid pursuant to a claim under such a contract before the fraud is discovered, all the sums paid under that claim will be recoverable by the insurer, including any sum referable to the genuine part of the claim.

Much will depend on the application of the case in subsequent litigation, and the decision of the Court of Appeal in Sunderland CC v Conn [2008] IRLR 324, [2007] EWCA Civ 1492 suggests a wary approach, insisting on a high threshold before unpleasant and, indeed, wholly unreasonable conduct becomes legally «harassment» of an employee.

The Court of Appeal upheld the approach taken by the district judge when it gave judgment on 25 October 2006 -LRB-[2006] EWCA Civ 1386), some four months before the appeal in Scott was argued before the US Supreme Court.