Thus, recent paleoclimatic temperature reconstructions imply that the natural climate variability varied significantly more than predicted by
the CMIP5 general circulation models, which use Lean's low - variability TSI model (e.g.: Scafetta 2013a, b, c).
Discussion on climate oscillations:
CMIP5 general circulation models versus a semi-empirical harmonic model based on astronomical cycles.
Not exact matches
Precipitation extremes and their potential future changes were predicted using six - member ensembles of
general circulation models (GCMs) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (
CMIP5).
«The NASA Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Projections (NEX - GDDP) dataset is comprised of downscaled climate scenarios for the globe that are derived from the
General Circulation Model (GCM) runs conducted under the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (
CMIP5) and across two of the four greenhouse gas emissions scenarios known as Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs).
The
General Circulation Models (GCM) driving the regional models chosen are rated in the top 25 %, according to a performance evaluation of
CMIP5 models carried out by Perez et al. (2014), in their ability to reproduce spatial patterns and climate variability over the north - east Atlantic region, that is the most influential on the European weather patterns.
Only an extremely simple one, nothing like the dozens of sophisticated
General Circulation Models currently participating in
CMIP5.