Sentences with phrase «co2 emissions number»

Fyi, our CO2 emissions number for logging is about 447 million tons of CO2 annually.

but nothing since, do you have, or can you point me to, the global CO2 emissions numbers for more recent years?

Not exact matches

Fortunately, the highest numbers of poor people are concentrated in the regions where removal of subsidies will have the weakest effect on CO2 emissions.

Australia relies heavily on coal for its own electricity as well, emitting more CO2 per person than any other developed country, and its agricultural emissions are among the highest per capita in the world, mainly because of the large numbers of sheep and cattle.

Climate change research, shown here by number of publications, primarily concerns countries that are less vulnerable to climate change and have a higher emission of CO2.

At Xcel Energy, the utility firm with the highest total wind capacity in the United States, the number of forecasting errors has dropped since 2009, saving customers some US$ 60 million and reducing annual CO2 emissions from fossil - reserve power generation by more than a quarter of a million tonnes per year, says Drake Bartlett, a renewable - energy analyst with the firm who is based in Denver, Colorado.

The research team concluded that growth in CO2 emissions around the valley was more influenced by the type of neighborhood than by the total number of people moving into that neighborhood.

The shift back to fossil fuels, combined with rapid growth in the number of cars on the roads (see «Fuelling Brazil's transport boom»), has worsened city smog and caused emissions in the transport sector to spike at about 170 million tons of CO2 in 2011, up from less than 140 million tons in 2008.

Emissions from wildfires totalled more than 1bn tonnes of CO2 from 2003 - 2015, the lead author tells Carbon Brief, and climate change, along with forest fragmentation, could cause a further increase in the number of forest fires in the coming decades.

Agrobusiness is the biggest cause of deforestation, CO2 emissions and animal extinction, besides of being responsible for the killing of more than a thousand innocent people, increase in the numbers of cancer and heart diseases, and the development of a culture of cruelty against animals.

Despite the demise of the Building Schools for the Future programme, the use of heat pumps in schools offer a number of advantages: • a simple and cost effective installation compared to some alternative technologies • ongoing schools building programmes can benefit from heat pump systems that improve the environmental footprint and reduce running and operational costs • a low carbon technology that helps to reduce CO2 emissions • a renewable heat technology to satisfy the UK's renewable obligation.

According to law if consumption (which is directly linked to CO2 emission) exceed 10 % of test numbers it gives the owner of the car right to return the car.

Not green enough to qualify for the brand's Ecomotive badge, of course, but markedly more environmentally responsible than a number of rivals which have CO2 emissions of 220 g / km and above.

The real world Porsche might claim an NEDC number of 3.0 L / 100 km and just 69g / km for CO2 emissions, but it's no accident that it retains an 80 - litre fuel tank.

US economy numbers aren't available yet, but on the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) Porsche says the Panamera 4 E-Hybrid should do 2.5 l / 100 km or 56 g / km of CO2 emissions.

These numbers equate to CO2 emissions of 158 and 168g / km for a car with the automatic or manual gearbox respectively, resulting in company - car Benefit - in - Kind (BiK) bands of 32 and 34 %.

The new range of power plants will include two gasoline engines: a 1.2 Liter and 1.4 Liter Twinport variants as well as two different diesel options: a 1.7 CDTI and 1.3 CDTI ecoFLEX with fuel consumption ranging between 5.0 and 5.5 liter / 100 km, about 50 MPG, with a maximum CO2 emissions of only 129 g / km, a number that is very low.

On paper, the numbers are pretty impressive; the three - door GTD (with the DSG gearbox) can crack 0 - 62mph in 7.4 seconds and a top speed of 143mph - while delivering combined fuel economy of 57.6 mpg and CO2 emissions of 129g / km.

The ADR combined cycle fuel economy number is listed at a lean 5.4 L / 100 km with CO2 emissions of 143g / km.

Increasing the number of gear ratios from six to nine improves fuel economy and a correspondingly reduces CO2 emissions.

New Renault Clio: a pleasure to drive, and targeting number one status for fuel economy and low CO2 emissions

The C4 Cactus with a number of improvements to reduce fuel consumption and CO2 emission, with a mileage of 50 km / l, will be revealed.

The N55 inline - 6 puts up the same power and torque numbers as the N54 twin - turbo, only now with less mechanical effort and fewer CO2 emissions.

The system has the capacity to reduce CO2 emissions by 861,000 pounds a year, which is the environmental equivalent of growing 9,000 seedlings for 10 years, or eliminating the number of miles driven by a car by 978,000 miles a year.

I know that for us treehuggers the bigger vehicles are things that we don't even want to think about, but as long as they sell, they're a low - hanging fruit for CO2 reductions, since turning a big giant sedan or SUV into a plug - in will provide a bigger reduction in emissions in absolute numbers.

One caution on the emission report numbers: I agree with your estimate of 75 % reliable, but the atmospheric and ocean accumulation of CO2 are only partly driven by the emissions covered in the reports.

There are a vast number of lines of evidence that the industrial age CO2 increase is a result of human - caused emissions.

There are other factors (changes in the natural sources of emissions in a warmed environment, changes in the function of traditional carbon sinks in a warmed environment, tipping points like increase forest fire activity in a warmed environment, etc.) that also play a significant role in the truly important number, which is accumulation of CO2 / e in the atmosphere and ocean acidification.

Given the number of ways that things can go wrong with continued CO2 emissions (from ocean acidfication and sea level rise to simple warming, shifting precipitation patterns, release of buried carbon in perma - frost, and the possibility of higher climate sensitivities — which seem to be needed to account for glacial / inter-glacial transitions), crossing our fingers and carrying on with BAU seems nothing short of crazy to me.

At that time I expect the turn around will be surprisingly rapid (say 20 years for a 50 - 80 % cut in CO2 emission from the peak) and a number of technofixes will be attempted to reduce solar insulation while atmosphereic CO2 is brought under control.

If CO2 emission certificates would be based on the number of citizens, then China would be allowed about 5 times the emissions of the U.S. which would cause a huge net transfer of money to the developing countries, which makes this approach unacceptable to the rich countries for unfair reasons.

Despite this too - high sensitivity number, the scenario B projection (the only one worth looking at, since that most closely models actual CO2 emissions), was pretty darn good.

Additionally, we have Anderson's computations showing that ~ 10 % CO2 emissions reduction per annum is required for years to stay within a (dangerous) 2 C ceiling target, and these numbers don't include the adverse effects of major carbon cycle feedbacks.

Assuming all humans have the same right to live, one could agree that all countries have the right to sell CO2 emission certificates according to the number of citizens and to distribute the produced income equally among their citizens.

Even if you cut the CO2 number in half (e.g., not all will go in the ocean), we are still two - orders of magnitude bigger than the effect of sulfur emissions.

The magazine campaign, created by the European Fur Breeders» Association (EFBA), listed a number of reasons «Why it's eco-friendly to wear fur» including points such as «Fur lasts a lifetime,» «No waste,» «Food Chain Recycling,» «Helps conservation,» and «Reduced CO2 gas emissions.»

The flow of climate refugees to date numbers in the thousands, but if we do not quickly reduce CO2 emissions, it could one day number in the millions.

HP's Emissions Data By The Numbers The CO2 emissions emanating form over 80 % of HP's first - tier supply chain was 3.5 million metEmissions Data By The Numbers The CO2 emissions emanating form over 80 % of HP's first - tier supply chain was 3.5 million metemissions emanating form over 80 % of HP's first - tier supply chain was 3.5 million metric tons.

So, to recap, the U.S. — which has one of the best CO2 - emissions - reduction track records in the world — is being held up as the bad guy, while the countries busily increasing their CO2 emissions, including number one culprit China (now responsible for around 30 per cent of the world's total emissions) get a free pass.

The International Energy Agency reported flat CO2 emissions in 2014 and 2015 but BP said it did not take into account numbers that became available later on with regard to Chinese carbon output related to higher grade coal it had been burning.

By these numbers (1990s per EIA) it is still the anthro emissions that account for the atmospheric buildup, but there is none - the-less a pot load of CO2 that gets absorbed each year — near 34 time that of man's emissions.

The document begins by making a number of irrelevant and misleading statements about human carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.

- The number of lbs of CO2 gas emissions for heating your house.

Power - sector CO2 emissions are influenced by a number of factors not directly affected by environmental policies, such as macroeconomic growth levels and relative fuel prices.

«This number is sufficiently intuitive to allow one to grasp the contribution of personal CO2 emissions to the loss of Arctic sea ice,» Notz and Stroeve write.

The long - expected finding, set in motion two years ago by a Supreme Court ruling, moves the Obama administration one step closer to regulating CO2 emissions from a number of sources across the country.

(Willis Eschenbach) Watts Up With That There's two numbers of interest — how much will it cost to reduce CO2 emissions, and how much will the decreased CO2 reduce the temperature?

For instance, global cementitious production by companies in the «Getting the Numbers Right» (GNR) increased by 76.9 % (from 507 to 897 million tons) between 1990 and 2015, whereas global total net CO2 emissions increased by only 43 % (from 383 to 549 million tons).

What I have to continue to ask alarmists is why 97 % carries weight when it comes to numbers of scientists, but not when 97 % / yr CO2 emissions are natural.

It has a number of attractive features, including a limited land footprint, the ability to site units near to CO2 storage sites and a clarity around how much CO2 it sequesters, in contrast to negative emissions that use biomass.