Sentences with phrase «cope scales of problem»

The greatest disappointment in this study was the lack of significant correlation between VIEW and the main COPE scales of Problem - focused, Emotion - focused, and Avoidance Coping styles.

Not exact matches

Measures included the Trauma History Questionnaire, PTSD Checklist — Civilian Version, Alcohol and Drug Use History Questionnaire, Center for Epidemiological Studies — Depression Scale, the Brief COPE, and the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems.

Results: Reliability and validity of the scale and its four subscales, such as «stop unpleasant emotions and thoughts» (a = 0.92) «used problem - focused coping» (a = 0.71), Self - efficacy on diabetes problem solving (a = 0.74) and «get support from friends and family» (a = 0.67) were approved explicitly by a psychometric analysis; these show that the scale was slightly valid and reliable on the study setting.

Coping was measured by using the Children's Response Style Questionnaire (CRSQ), 29 the Brief COPE, 30 and the Coping Self - Efficacy Scale (CSE).31 The CRSQ measures 3 types of reactions: rumination, problem solving, and distraction with adequate reliability (rumination α = 0.86 and 0.87; problem solving α = 0.68 and 0.73; distraction α = 0.67 and 0.70).

The scales of the Brief COPE are divided into two coping styles by summing items into the following categories: problem - focused coping (Religion, Acceptance, Planning, Positive reframing, Active coping, Instrumental support, Emotional support, and Humor).

Coping skills were assessed using three subscales from the Self - Report Coping Scale (Causey and Dubow, 1992) which measured problem focused coping (e.g., «get help from a friend») and two types of emotion focused coping, avoidance internalizing (e.g., «go off by yourself») and avoidance externalizing (e.g., «get mad and throw or hit something&raCoping skills were assessed using three subscales from the Self - Report Coping Scale (Causey and Dubow, 1992) which measured problem focused coping (e.g., «get help from a friend») and two types of emotion focused coping, avoidance internalizing (e.g., «go off by yourself») and avoidance externalizing (e.g., «get mad and throw or hit something&raCoping Scale (Causey and Dubow, 1992) which measured problem focused coping (e.g., «get help from a friend») and two types of emotion focused coping, avoidance internalizing (e.g., «go off by yourself») and avoidance externalizing (e.g., «get mad and throw or hit something&racoping (e.g., «get help from a friend») and two types of emotion focused coping, avoidance internalizing (e.g., «go off by yourself») and avoidance externalizing (e.g., «get mad and throw or hit something&racoping, avoidance internalizing (e.g., «go off by yourself») and avoidance externalizing (e.g., «get mad and throw or hit something»).

The Ways Of Coping Questionnaire (WOC)(Folkman & Lazarus, 1988) is a 66 - item self - report questionnaire to assess coping related to a particular event to be answered on a 4 - point Likert scale (0 = does not apply / or not used, 1 = used somewhat, 2 = used quite a bit, 3 = used a great deal) with eight subscales: Confrontive Coping, Distancing, Self - Controlling, Seeking Social Support Accepting, Responsibility, Escape - Avoidance, Planful Problem Solving, and Positive ReapprCoping Questionnaire (WOC)(Folkman & Lazarus, 1988) is a 66 - item self - report questionnaire to assess coping related to a particular event to be answered on a 4 - point Likert scale (0 = does not apply / or not used, 1 = used somewhat, 2 = used quite a bit, 3 = used a great deal) with eight subscales: Confrontive Coping, Distancing, Self - Controlling, Seeking Social Support Accepting, Responsibility, Escape - Avoidance, Planful Problem Solving, and Positive Reapprcoping related to a particular event to be answered on a 4 - point Likert scale (0 = does not apply / or not used, 1 = used somewhat, 2 = used quite a bit, 3 = used a great deal) with eight subscales: Confrontive Coping, Distancing, Self - Controlling, Seeking Social Support Accepting, Responsibility, Escape - Avoidance, Planful Problem Solving, and Positive ReapprCoping, Distancing, Self - Controlling, Seeking Social Support Accepting, Responsibility, Escape - Avoidance, Planful Problem Solving, and Positive Reappraisal.

The Incope (Bodenmann, 2000) is a questionnaire (5 - point scale) with 23 items (α = 0.80) developed on the basis of the COPE (Carver, Scheier, & Weintraub, 1989) measuring the following subscales such as active problem - solving («I attempt to tackle and solve the problem»), positive self - verbalization («I persuade myself that I will make it»), rumination («I ruminate for a long time and keep on thinking about the occurrence»), passivity / evasion («I wait until things change on their own, even if I might be able to do something»), negative emotional expression («I express my feelings without considering what this means for others»), substance use («I consume something that calms me down (cigarettes, alcohol, sweets, tranquiliser»)(α = 0.52 to α = 0.80).

Participants were asked to indicate how much they used these strategies to cope with problems on 5 - point scale ranging from «Never» to «Very Often,» with higher scores indicating more frequent use of that coping strategy.

Scores ≥ 10 and > 12 indicate probable depression in community and clinical samples, respectively.12, 13 Mothers rated their stress levels (1 = «no problems or stresses» to 5 = «many problems and stressful») and coping (1 = «extremely well» to 5 = «not at all») on global 5 - point scales.14 Two additional questions assessed limits on daily functioning as a result of maternal emotional or physical health problems (adapted from a generic health measure, the SF6).