This is somewhat consistent with the suggestion that conduct problems in high
CU children are less influenced by coercive parental responding to this behavior, including harsh discipline and criticism [58, 64, 65].
In our second study, we observed that mothers of higher
CU children were more likely to dismiss instances of children's verbal expression of emotion.
To our knowledge, we are unaware of any previous research examining how caregivers respond to high
CU children when they are emotional or verbalizing feelings.
Although past studies have demonstrated associations between CU traits and discipline - related parenting practices and global qualities of the parent — child relationship, there has been no prior examination of parents» evaluations and reactions to emotional displays in high
CU children (to our knowledge).
Reduced emotional distance (i.e., increased warmth) within the family pictures was more strongly related to reduced conduct problems in high CU compared to low
CU children, further adding support to the notion that parental warmth is of unique importance to the development of children with CU traits (hypothesis c).
Not exact matches
He went to the little girl and, amid disbelieving laughter from those mourning her death, said to the
child, «Tal» itha
cu» mi,» which means, «Little girl, I say to you, arise.»
I've made it my goal to deliver dynamic gymnastics programming which fosters
children's physical, and mental ability to reach their highest potential and to provide exceptional
cu
The Power of Yes [3] Duhachek A, Zhang S, Krishnan S. Connections in the brains of young
children strengthen during sleep,
CU - Boulder study finds.
«Although the effects of light are well studied in adults, virtually nothing is known about how evening light exposure affects the physiology, health and development of preschool - aged
children,» said lead author Lameese Akacem, a
CU Boulder instructor and researcher in the Sleep and Development Lab.
TEDDY's effort began in 2004 with
children from six clinical centers: three in the U.S. (Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes at
CU Anschutz, the Pacific Northwest Research Institute in Seattle, and Augusta University in Georgia) and three in Europe (Universities of Turku, Oulu, and Tampere in Finland, Helmholtz Zentrum München in Germany, and Lund University in Sweden).
A life long Coloradan, my education includes degrees from
CU - Boulder, Baylor University and a two year clinical fellowship at the Yale
Child Study Center.
Strong, positive representations of family relationships may be particularly important to behavioural change in
children with high
CU traits and their families.
For
children with high
CU traits, the affective quality of the parent -
child relationship (as opposed to parental discipline) is more strongly related to their conduct problems (Kochanska 1997; Pasalich et al. 2011).
Our results might be interpreted as suggesting that internal representations of family relations constitute a treatment mechanism that is more dominant in families with
children who present with high
CU traits.
Higher family dysfunction scores were associated with increased levels of callous - unemotional (
CU) traits in the
children pre-treatment.
More recently, studies have focused on
child factors and a consistent finding has been that behavioural parent training appears to be less effective in treating conduct problems in
children with high callous - unemotional (
CU) traits (e.g., limited empathy and guilt, shallow affect; Hawes et al. 2014).
Measures utilized include the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), the Eyberg
Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI), Effortful Control (EC), the Callous / Unemotional Traits (
CU), the Parental Stress Index - Short Form, the Marital Quality Scale (MQS - I), and the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire — Preschool, Revised.
In contrast, findings of previous studies reporting that enhanced parental discipline is more conducive to change in
children not demonstrating
CU traits could not be replicated (hypothesis d).
Participants were divided into two groups of high and low
CU traits using the standard cut - off by Dadds et al. (2014), classifying
children as high in
CU traits if their score was 8 or greater.
Children with high levels of
CU, however, demonstrated greater change in FDP dysfunction than a low
CU group, resulting in similar levels at follow - up.
Measures utilized include the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), the Eyberg
Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI), Effortful Control (EC), the Callous / Unemotional traits (
CU), the Parental Stress Index - Short Form, the Marital Quality Scale (MQS - I), and the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire — Preschool, Revised.
Similarly, equivalence of the high and low
CU groups was tested by performing analyses of variance on key variables (e.g.,
child adjustment, number of treatment sessions).
As affective relationship quality is especially important to behavioural change in
children with high
CU traits, an association between change in warmth in the pictures and
child outcome would be moderated by levels of
CU traits, such that more warmth would be more strongly related to positive outcomes in the
child for
children with high
CU traits compared to those with low
CU traits (hypothesis c).
Moreover, for
children elevated on
CU traits, parental warmth is negatively associated with their conduct problems [19].
Interestingly, a few of the interventions that have been successful in ameliorating
CU traits / conduct problems across treatment, have tailored the regimen to fit with the presenting problems of the referred
child and his / her family [8, 9, 10].
For the
children rated high on
CU traits at baseline, this novel treatment significantly improved their levels of affective empathy, and decreased conduct problem behavior, in comparison to standard PMT.
In the one previous study that has examined emotion - related parenting behavior, mothers» frequency of communication about negative emotions was found to be inversely related to conduct problem severity in
children with high levels of
CU traits [29].
Moreover, considering that various facets of parent —
child interaction relate to
CU traits, future longitudinal research should examine which particular dimensions (e.g., parental behavior management, relationship - based, and emotion - related) independently predict levels of childhood
CU traits over time.
Despite its overlap with conduct problems,
CU traits are a distinct risk - related feature in
children [4].
Specifically, our prediction was that
children with combined
CU traits and oppositional related problems would orient attention less toward negative emotional faces, especially fearful ones.
Our results demonstrated that, for the Fearful Peak Away parameter,
children with combined high levels of
CU traits and ODD - related problems had greater avoidance of fearful faces.
For example, how do parents of
children elevated on
CU traits interpret and respond to their
child's experience and expression of affect?
This finding remained significant after accounting for the potential effects of other dimensions of
child problematic behavior, suggesting a unique association between this element of emotion socialization and
CU traits.
Results showed that, as compared to typically developing
children and
children with low levels of
CU traits,
children with conduct problems and high levels of
CU traits displayed reduced attentional capture by irrelevant emotional faces.
However, these previous results also report divergent findings, that range from attentional avoidance (see Hodsoll et al., 2014, who found that boys aged 8 — 16 with clinical levels of conduct problems and high levels of
CU showed reduced attentional capture by angry faces) to attentional orientation toward angry faces (see Ezpeleta et al., 2017b, who showed that
children with high but non-clinical levels of
CU traits and ODD - related problems oriented their attention to angry faces to the same degree as
children with low
CU traits and low ODD - related problems, during an emotional version of the Go / No - Go task).
In DSM - 5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2013), the inclusion of the specification «with limited prosocial emotions» for CD disorder allows the identification of a more homogenous subgroup of
children with CD who also have
CU traits.
The first objective of the present investigation was to analyze, in a sample of preschool
children, the independent contributions and the interaction effects of
CU traits, anxiety and ODD - related problems on attentional orienting to emotional faces.
Here we extend on these past studies by providing the first evidence of a relationship between
CU traits and the style in which parents appraise and respond to
children's experience and expression of emotions.
Findings from this line of research have direct implications for tailoring novel interventions for conduct - problem
children with
CU traits, and will expand on the limited research investigating emotion - related parenting in the families of such
children.
The quality of the parent —
child relationship appears to be another dimension of family functioning associated with
CU traits.
Specifically, mothers of
children rated higher on
CU traits appear to have emotion socialization beliefs and practices that are less accepting, and more dismissing, of
child emotion.
We also examined the potentially confounding effects of
children's externalizing symptoms, to confirm unique relationships between parental emotion socialization and levels of
CU traits.
Therefore, these data point that, in relation to angry faces,
children with combined
CU traits and ODD - related problems can show either attentional facilitation or avoidance of these stimuli.
Three groups of
children were selected based on parent - rated ODD and
CU behaviors at the 36 - month assessment (N = 37; ODD+
CU, N = 7; ODD - only, N = 12; non-ODD, N = 18).
Past research has shown that various dimensions of parent —
child interaction, including qualities of parents» disciplinary behavior and the parent —
child relationship, are associated with levels of
CU traits in
children.
In our first study, we found that mothers of
children rated higher on
CU traits tended to have affective attitudes that were less accepting of
children's experience and expression of emotions.
Table 2 shows descriptive statistics for
children's DBD symptoms (i.e., CP and ADHD symptoms) and
CU traits, and parental emotion socialization variables; as well as the bivariate correlations among these variables.
Second, our findings on temperament may be useful for early intervention and prevention efforts targeting
children who fit the profile of elevated risk, in terms of their temperament, for future development of
CU traits and ODD - related problems.
The scarce literature on attention to angry faces in
children with non-clinical levels of ODD problems and
CU traits makes it difficult to link our results with previous data.
Thus, in terms of their impaired emotional functioning,
children with
CU traits are less likely to recognize and respond to others» negative emotions.