In 2014, the plaintiffs in the Vergara trial claimed that several
California education statutes — all of which are on the books at the behest of the teachers unions — cause greater harm to minority and economically disadvantaged populations because their schools «have a disproportionate share of grossly ineffective teachers.»
Not exact matches
If successful, this lawsuit will remove the tenure, seniority and arcane dismissal
statutes from the
California education code and render them unconstitutional, thus making it easier to get rid of incompetent and criminal teachers while outlawing seniority as a method of teacher - retention.
But because these terms are not found in
statute, this meaning is used inconsistently, and the
California Department of
Education (CDE) discourages their use.)
Because
education is a «fundamental interest» under the state Constitution, the five
statutes that «dictate this unequal, arbitrary result violate the equal protection provisions of the
California Constitution» and should be overturned.
In
California, English language learners make up 22.3 percent of total enrollment in
California public schools, but the majority of these students are placed in English - only immersion programs, as is mandated by Proposition 227, the 1998
statute that banned bilingual
education in schools.
The story, «The War on Teacher Tenure,» is mostly about the Vergara decision — in which a judge found that the tenure, seniority and dismissal
statutes in the
California education code are unconstitutional.
Plaintiffs allege that these
statutes, which impinge students» fundamental right to
education and have a disproportionate impact on low - income and minority students, violate their equal protection rights under the
California Constitution.
«By
statute, [CALPADs] comprises only the data that the federal government requires [
California] to collect, so it's not a comprehensive data system [and there are] a lot of weaknesses in it,» said David Plank, head of the research group Policy Analysis for
California Education, or PACE.
June 6, 2014 ACLU of
California and Public Advocates contacted then - Superintendent John Deasy requesting that the district remove the $ 450 million in special
education expenditures from its estimate of services for high - need students to comply with the
statute and regulations.
Chapter 558 of the
Statutes of 2010 (Senate Bill 1413, Leno) establishes
California Education Code (EC) Section 38086, which requires school districts to provide access to free, fresh drinking water during meal times.