This may be too onerous, referring back to
the California ethics opinion.
Recently, a State Bar of
California ethics opinion extended that duty of technology competence to e-discovery.
A recent
California ethics opinion addresses the use of a laptop by an attorney, where the laptop may be monitored by the law firm, and use of the laptop in public and home wireless networks.
One thing I liked about
the California ethics opinion is they actually had a little scenario that explained how a lawyer could get into trouble in an innocent way.
To me, one of the most telling signs of what this might mean was
a California ethics opinion that came down this year dealing particularly with ediscovery.
Jim Calloway: One thing I liked about
the California ethics opinion is they actually had a little scenario that explained how a lawyer could get into trouble in an innocent way.
A State Bar of
California ethics opinion recently extended that duty to include competence in e-discovery.
One of the interesting things about
the California ethics opinions is a very detailed discussion of the scenario that they make very clear that again, it's okay if you bring in others.
Not exact matches
California's COPRAC issues advisory
opinions on real and hypothetical questions of attorney
ethics.
California's Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct (COPRAC) has been working on an
ethics opinion on the applicability to attorney advertising rules to blogs for a while now, and after receiving public comments on its draft
opinion, it released a revised draft and opened up a new 90 - day public comment period.
In
California, that post would violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, according to a recent
ethics opinion issued by the -LSB-...]
California's proposed
ethics opinion on attorney duties in e-discovery has been finalized.
California's Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct (COPRAC) has been working on an
ethics opinion on the applicability to attorney advertising rules to blogs for a while now, and after receiving public comments on its draft
opinion.
It seems that the issue arised in
California because we have a fresh
opinion from their
ethics committee where they confirm what we all knew: should a client ask for his file, he has the right to get everything in electronic format...