You can read our article about
the California federal jury trial decision in POM Wonderful here.
Not exact matches
It also announced that a
federal grand
jury in
California has subpoenaed the chain, requiring it to produce documents related to an August outbreak of norovirus in Simi Valley,
California.
Last week, a
federal jury deadlocked on a claim by the University of
California (UC) that South San Francisco biotech giant Genentech had infringed the university's patent on the gene for human growth hormone.
A former top deputy to Superintendent of Public Instruction Bill Honig of
California is among several people ordered to appear before state or
federal grand
juries probing allegations that Mr. Honig violated conflict - of - interest laws by aiding his wife's consulting firm.
A
California jury gave the furry frown queen more than $ 700,000 this week in a
federal lawsuit over the use of her identity.
We have more news this morning that FIJA's educational outreach efforts are paying off through the hard work of activists nationwide, this time from San Diego,
California: Filner Urges «
Jury Nullification» In Medical Pot Dispensary Case San Diego Mayor Bob Filner has injected himself into a
federal criminal case against the operator of a medical -LSB-...]
The group has extensive
jury trial experience, having tried numerous cases to verdict in both state and
federal court, including several cases recognized by the Daily Journal as top defense verdicts in
California.
These include: United States v. Resendiz - Ponce, which presents the question whether the omission of an element from a
federal indictment can constitute harmless error (9th Circuit says no); Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc., on whether a provider of pay phone services can sue a long distance carrier for alleged violations of the Federal Communications Commission's regulations concerning compensation for coinless pay phone calls (9th Circuit says yes); Cunningham v. California, a sentencing case involving whether whether California's Determinate Sentencing Law violates the 6th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution by permitting California state court judges at sentencing to impose enhanced sentenced based on their determination of facts neither found by the jury nor admitted by the defendant; and Carey v. Musladin, reviewing the 9th Circuit's decision to overturn a murder conviction of a defendant who claimed he was denied a fair trial because the victim's relatives appeared in court wearing buttons with the deceased's picture o
federal indictment can constitute harmless error (9th Circuit says no); Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc., on whether a provider of pay phone services can sue a long distance carrier for alleged violations of the
Federal Communications Commission's regulations concerning compensation for coinless pay phone calls (9th Circuit says yes); Cunningham v. California, a sentencing case involving whether whether California's Determinate Sentencing Law violates the 6th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution by permitting California state court judges at sentencing to impose enhanced sentenced based on their determination of facts neither found by the jury nor admitted by the defendant; and Carey v. Musladin, reviewing the 9th Circuit's decision to overturn a murder conviction of a defendant who claimed he was denied a fair trial because the victim's relatives appeared in court wearing buttons with the deceased's picture o
Federal Communications Commission's regulations concerning compensation for coinless pay phone calls (9th Circuit says yes); Cunningham v.
California, a sentencing case involving whether whether
California's Determinate Sentencing Law violates the 6th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution by permitting
California state court judges at sentencing to impose enhanced sentenced based on their determination of facts neither found by the
jury nor admitted by the defendant; and Carey v. Musladin, reviewing the 9th Circuit's decision to overturn a murder conviction of a defendant who claimed he was denied a fair trial because the victim's relatives appeared in court wearing buttons with the deceased's picture on them.
Represented the former owner of an aviation repair station in a month - long
federal criminal
jury trial in
California.
Our
California environmental lawyers also represent clients accused of environmental crimes before grand
juries and in state and
federal trial and appellate courts.
He has extensive experience in bench and
jury trials, binding arbitrations, judicial references, mediations, and appellate work in state and
federal courts throughout
California.
He has over 30 years of experience in bench and
jury trials, binding arbitrations, judicial references, mediations, and appellate work in state and
federal courts in
California.
His experience includes representing clients in investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as before
Federal Grand
Juries, the
Federal Trade Commission, and before various state and local regulatory agencies, including the
California and Arizona State Boards of Accountancy.
In addition, we represented Toshiba and several of its subsidiaries in a high - profile US
jury trial concerning the related criminal investigation and civil litigation, and defended Toshiba in securing dismissal of a securities class action in US
federal court in
California.
As an example, a
California state
jury acquitted four LAPD officers of the Rodney King beating in 1992, then a
federal court later convicted two of those officers.
Apple told an eight - member
jury during opening statements in a high - profile
California federal damages trial Tuesday that Samsung owes it more than $ 1 billion for infringing three of Apple's design patents covering iPhones, while Samsung pegged the number at just $ 28 million.
Last year, a U.S.
federal jury in
California ruled that Samsung violated some of Apple's patents and awarded the company based in Cupertino, Calif., damages of nearly $ 1 billion.