Sentences with phrase «camera quality seems»

Camera quality seems a little better.

The camera quality seems irreparable though, so if you care about imaging, this is a no - go for me.

Not exact matches

The idea of using your camera phone for a good quality picture might seem counter intuitive to some people, especially if you have a good SLR camera, but don't dismiss the idea out of hand.

David Ayer's presence behind the camera has been a major talking point; for all the qualities of his previous films, he is essentially a workmanlike gun - for - hire, who occasionally seems lost in the more fantastical elements of the DC world.

Considering Skype just bumped video quality up to 1080p last month, including a 2 megapixel camera on front seems reasonable at the very least.

One thing it seems Google and T3 can agree on is that a tablet is no place for rear - facing cameras so the Nexus 7 sticks to a 1.2 - Megapixel front - facing camera which offers decent enough clarity and quality for video calling over Skype or Google + Hangouts.

3rd, The camera quality IMHO seems better than the G2, as well as the screen quality and picture.

The camera seems to work pretty well, and I've been very happy with voice call quality.

The image is also revealing a front facing camera, a micro USB port at the bottom along with a three speaker set up that seems to be designed to output stereo quality sound both in landscape and portrait mode.

However with selfies having already boomed, it seems that front - facing cameras are now just as important as the rear - facing ones as they will allow for high - quality selfie snaps.

In our limited environment, the back - facing camera seemed to be of passable quality, but we need to get the final version of the Tab out into the wild to truly put it through its paces.

Microsoft seems to have used the same camera modules in the front and the back, so you can expect the same level of quality on both.

Both devices are hence shipping with 12.2 - megapixel primary cameras which may not seem like a high number in a vacuum but should still deliver a high - quality performance, with the sensors mounted behind the lenses having a pixel size of 1.4 µm.

It seems like in general, Xiaomi's smartphone cameras manage to come up with high - quality photos only under optimal lighting conditions.

The 5 megapixel front - facing camera seems like a much more reasonable experience in comparison, as that standard of quality is relatively average for modern day selfie cams.

Triple cameras on a smartphone may seem odd, but it should mean better quality images.

The price may seem a bit steep when you consider offerings such as OnePlus 3T with far more powerful processing speeds, but the Vivo V5 Plus brings in a lot more than the selfie camera set up to the table that also works well — good looks and build, liquid - smooth OS performance, commendable battery life, amazing sound quality and above average primary camera performance (if only the primary camera had OIS, the V5 Plus would be a tough one to beat).

In our hands - on review of the Nokia 6, we noted that the camera seemed to offer decently good picture quality in bright light.

As far as image quality is concerned, the OnePlus X does tend to have the softer image, while shots with the Nexus 5X camera seem to be a little sharper.

One thing it seems Google and T3 can agree on is that a tablet is no place for rear - facing cameras so the Nexus 7 sticks to a 1.2 - Megapixel front - facing camera which offers decent enough clarity and quality for video calling over Skype or Google + Hangouts.

It seems to me that smartphone camera quality achieved «good enough» status several years ago.

The image quality experts did not give the OnePlus 3 and 3T a rating, but with the new deal, it seems the OnePlus 5 flagship killer could indeed be a monster of a camera phone.

The overall picture and video quality is over-hyped, as the secondary camera seems to be more of a gimmick than an actual feature that you would use.

On paper, the LG G6 seems like the most - equipped to take high - quality photos with its two rear cameras, but it's tough to determine for sure without some extensive camera tests comparing the results.

I tested the camera briefly during my time with the Nokia 6, and auto - focus seemed fast enough, and picture quality was what you'd expect from a mid-range phone like this.

UPDATE: It would seem that Razer heard their cult calling for more camera quality — at least a little bit.

Call, quality, low sar value, fair camera, very good hspa + speed at 5.33 mbps, good display... However the battery life seems to be a let down.

Pros — Light weight and slim, FHD display is stunning, Camera quality little better than Yureka, Vibe UI is really good, battery backup seems to be better than Yureka, I think it's with quick charge facility cause 5 to 50 % charged in almost an hour and 100 % in less than 2.5 hours.

Display Size increased - good Camera megapixel numerical increase - but not the output image quality & restricted upto 720p recording RAM - should have been 2 GB @ this price Internal storage - seems good but should be able to let install app on external sd card too along with data; which seems impossibe (not sure if it can so) overall, 11k would have been diagestable price tag for this, though its not

An average camera and poor overall sound output quality really don't do it any favors for a media creation or consumption device, and despite the large screen there are no new productivity features that seem to take advantage of its size.

We had played with many affordable smartphones with a slow as 8MP cameras, and they seemed to be offering better quality output despite the lower resolution.

Overall, the BLU Vivo 5's image quality seems to be slightly better, dependent on lighting, but for the most part you'll find the front and rear camera experiences to be pretty similar.

It seems to come with the same 1.2 - megapixel camera as the iPhone 5s, which features the next generation backlight sensor with larger pixels, which should improve quality of the FaceTime calls and selfies.

We found the video quality to be generally lacking, and noticed that the camera didn't seem to use continuous auto focus to keep the video sharp as you move around.

Like the quality of the camera in most phones, speaker placement and throughput is also a common area that manufacturers just can't seem to nail down.

Colors don't come out decently well, and there is a lack of sharpness in almost all conditions, but comparing the quality with the cameras on Moto E and such with 5MP ones, the Asus ZenFone C seems quite better in overall quality.

Making dual cameras work harmoniously is a hard engineering challenge, and overcoming it seems to be costing companies the opportunity to advance their imaging in pure quality terms.

Though the camera experience has gotten a bit of an update, in mostly speed, quality seems to be on par with other high - end competitors.