Sentences with phrase «canadian citizens the right»

Section 23 of the Charter gives certain Canadian citizens the right to have their children receive education in the province or territory's minority language at government expense.

Not exact matches

The forum will also examine the controversial ISDS provision of the TPP, which would grant foreign corporations the right to sue governments if they believe a government decision negatively impacts their potential future profits — something neither Canadian companies nor private citizens have the right to do.

Some American companies offer a Canadian data storage option in response to market demand and governments should continue to have freedom to protect citizens» information and privacy rights as they see fit, Gogolek says in the submission, part of federal consultations on the NAFTA renegotiation.

I believe almost no US citizens are aware for example that today in Canada is celebrated the National Day of Mourning, the 25th anniversary of the trading of Wayne Gretzky (he's a hockey player), to Los Angeles, much less how Canadians rate left and right.

The Canadian Wind Energy Association (CanWEA) and its members recognize the right of citizens to have a say in developments that affect their community.

Ten years ago the Canadian government launched a public inquiry to look into whether the actions of Canadian officials had contributed to the torture and other grave human rights violations that a Canadian citizen, Maher Arar, had experienced while he was illegally imprisoned in Syria for a year in 2002 and 2003.

Charter of Rights: The father and mother were married in Canada and moved to Germany a year later, where their children were born as Canadian citizens.

With a few exceptions, any person in Canada, whether a Canadian citizen, a permanent resident or a newcomer, has the rights and freedoms held in the Charter.

«The right of every citizen to vote, guaranteed by [Section Three] of the Charter, lies at the heart of Canadian democracy,» wrote Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein and Mr. Justice Michael Moldaver, for a majority of the Court.

In British Columbia, the federal government has allowed a foreign corporation to circumvent the Charter rights of Canadian citizens.

Unlike other jurisdictions which rely upon mandatory quota and affirmative action schemes to ensure more acceptable rates of employment amongst their handicapped citizens, Canadian governments have relied upon human rights legislation.

Earlier this week, departing Ontario ombudsman Andre Martin stated in a report, «Stopping citizens without an objective an reasonable basis for believing that they may be implicated in a recent or ongoing criminal offence, or where there are reasonable and probably grounds to arrest them, is unconstitutional — it's a form of arbitrary detention contrary to section 9 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.»

According to the Court, section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees all citizens the right to choose whether or not to speak with police.

Instead, the power of both the federal government and the provincial governments would be restrained in favour of the Canadian citizen who would, in consequence, be better protected in the exercise of his fundamental rights and freedoms.

I can think of no better occasion for seeking to find a solution to the problem of developing an Canadian constitution in Canada — of finally «patriating» our constitution — than when we have reached agreement on constitutional protection of the basic rights of the citizen.

The Canadian Bill of Rights sets out the legal rights of the citizen in respect of life, liberty, and the security of the person, and such basic political rights as freedom of speech and of the press, freedom of religion, and freedom of assRights sets out the legal rights of the citizen in respect of life, liberty, and the security of the person, and such basic political rights as freedom of speech and of the press, freedom of religion, and freedom of assrights of the citizen in respect of life, liberty, and the security of the person, and such basic political rights as freedom of speech and of the press, freedom of religion, and freedom of assrights as freedom of speech and of the press, freedom of religion, and freedom of assembly.

The Committee suggested that Canada was complicit in the torture of Canadian citizens post-9 / 11 and expressed concern at the «apparent reluctance on part of the State party [Canada] to protect rights of all Canadians detained in other countries.»

The Federal Court ruled Wednesday that the process to revoke citizenship under the Citizenship Act, as amended by the Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act of the last government in 2012, violates the Canadian Bill of Rights, and that naturalized citizens must have a fair hearing before an independent decision - maker before their citizenship can be stripped.

Defamatory libel is applied as a limit to citizens» Section 2 right to freedom of expression under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) has invited citizens to submit short papers (six to eight pages) toward a dialogue on human rights, specifically relating to religious belief and practice as shaped by the Ontario Human Rights Code and the Canadian Charter of Rights and FreRights Commission (OHRC) has invited citizens to submit short papers (six to eight pages) toward a dialogue on human rights, specifically relating to religious belief and practice as shaped by the Ontario Human Rights Code and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Frerights, specifically relating to religious belief and practice as shaped by the Ontario Human Rights Code and the Canadian Charter of Rights and FreRights Code and the Canadian Charter of Rights and FreRights and Freedoms.

In his ruling in Chambers v. Daou, Silverman said it breached Chambers» rights as a Canadian citizen under the Charter.

Conducting the Inquiry has reinforced my conviction that we can and must continue to do everything possible to protect our country, and to do so with genuine respect for the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadian citizens.

A RIGHT TO FULL PROTECTION UNDER THE PROVINCIAL EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS ACT AND REGULATIONS currently enjoyed by Canadian Citizens and Permanent Residents, including NO FEES for any work placement.

No Canadian jurisdiction now recognizes a human right to a healthy environment, or authorizes American - style citizen suits to enforce environmental rights.

In a democracy such as Canada, every Canadian citizen has the express right to disagree with public policy.

It proves that because of of the wisdom and integrity of Justice Ratushny, The Charter of Rights still applies to Canadian citizens.

3 (1)(c), 12 (3) and 24) that they swear or affirm allegiance to the Queen in order to become a Canadian citizen was a violation of their rights to freedom of conscience and religion (Charter, s. 2 (a)-RRB-, freedom of expression (s. 2 (b)-RRB- and equality (s. 15).

Rodriguez argues voting is a form of expression to which all Canadian citizens over the age of 18 are entitled, and so not being able to explicitly bemoan the electoral options on offer infringes on the charter right to free expression.

According to the Immigration law of Canada, permanent residents (i.e. a person who is not a Canadian citizen yet but has the legal right to live in Canada) and foreign nationals (i.e. those who do not have permanent legal status in Canada like visitor, foreign students, temporary workers) who have been convicted either in Canada or abroad of certain criminal offences may be denied admission to Canada or deported from Canada if they are criminally inadmissible.

While the number of migrant workers currently exceeds 200,000, live - in caregivers under the Live - In Caregivers Program (LCP), agricultural workers under the Seasonal Agricultural Workers Program, and other workers under the Temporary Foreign Workers Program (TFWP), face tremendous physical barriers that position them as second class citizens to the Canadian state in terms of their rights and benefits.

The National Council of Muslims, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and citizen Marie - Michelle Lacoste, have filed a motion which state that the law «severely undermines Muslim women's freedom of religion and the right to equality in Quebec.»

While Canadian citizens understand they have restricted privacy rights at international borders, they are not necessarily consenting to the information contained on the RFID chip in the passport being stored in a foreign government's database.»

Your motives are unjust and unreasonable FRANKLY i think canada is better then this nonsense and should be aware of how the government is portraying this country furthermore stop referring to canadian residing citizens as FORIEGNERS its harsh and i cant imagine canadian citizens would tolerate this discrimination which by the way goes against charter rights!

These non-criminal Canadian Citizens are treated like criminals and put in handcuffs, locked in the back of a police cars and dragged to a hospital without access to lawyers or Charter rights explained to every criminal.

In the Canadian legal system, Aboriginal title is recognized as sui generis, meaning it is the unique collective right to use of, and jurisdiction over, ancestral territory and is separate from the rights of non-Aboriginal Canadian citizens under common law.

Fraser, who authors a blog on Canadian privacy laws, said this arrangement violates citizens» basic rights to privacy.

French - language citizens outside Quebec had to wait until 1969 for the Official Languages Act to have Canadian government service in French guaranteed, and until 1982 for the Charter of Rights to open court action at the provincial level to obtain with difficulty French education or health services.

In Frank v. Canada, two Canadian citizens who reside in the United States have challenged the provisions of the Canada Elections Act that deny them the right to vote.

New Canadians are affected by a greater number of laws, systems and bureaucracies dealing specifically with their rights and obligations, than other citizens of Canada, for example, immigration and refugee law and laws providing social benefits.

If a line isn't drawn here by the Court of Appeal, then I invite you to imagine the vastness of power that we as Canadians would be handing over in exchange for human rights violations against ourselves or our fellow citizens.

As permanent residents or citizens, these workers will have full mobility rights within the Canadian labour market, meaning it will be much more difficult for employers to use them as pawns to drive down wages and conditions on individual worksites or across sectors of the economy.

Canadian citizens have full rights of citizenship.

In some cases, Canada determines that an individual — who is not a Canadian citizen — is deemed inadmissible to Canada on the grounds that they pose a threat to national security, have committed violations of human or international rights, or are involved in serious or organized criminality.

Passed in 1977 by the Parliament of Canada, the Canadian Human Rights Act is a piece of legislation that outlines legal protections for all citizens of Canada.

A strong and independent judicial branch is required to protect all Canadian citizens and uphold our Constitutional Rights and Freedoms.

In our view, it is difficult to reconcile the Supreme Court of Canada's 1988 decision in BCGEU v. British Columbia (Attorney General), confirming that every Canadian citizen has the fundamental right to unimpeded access to the courts, with the notion of Canada's superior courts operating as a default user - pay system of justice, subject to an individual establishing an entitlement to an exemption from court fees.

Commissioner Stoddart: Access to information has been a right for Canadian citizens over the last 10 years.

Section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that «every citizen of Canada has the right to vote in an election of members of the House of Commons.»

Despite subsection (1.2), if the Minister is of the opinion that a WPPT country does not grant a right to remuneration, similar in scope and duration to that provided by subsection 19 (1.2), for the performance in public or the communication to the public of a sound recording whose maker, at the date of its first fixation, was a Canadian citizen or permanent resident within the meaning of subsection 2 (1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act or, if a corporation, had its headquarters in Canada, the Minister may, by a statement published in the Canada Gazette, limit the scope and duration of the protection for sound recordings whose first fixation is done by a maker who is a citizen or permanent resident of that country or, if a corporation, has its headquarters in that country.

On April 4, the Senate of Canada passed an amendment to Bill C - 6, creating a right to a Federal Court hearing for Canadian citizens who are alleged to have misrepresented themselves in their original citizenship application.