As of tomorrow, the modern remnant of the «Long Vacation» [1] is over for
us Canadian civil litigators.
Not exact matches
This post is already too long but, for the sake of completeness, since I've suggested there's a significant problem in the judge's use of «substantial», I'll add a bit more, including a reference to the case that once wasn't quite every
Canadian (common law side) judge and
civil litigator's favourite case on many aspects of proof of causation and damages.
«This is a good example of our court taking some initiative to solve a problem, and I hope that counsel will take advantage of it,» says Dean Crawford, a
civil litigator and vice president of the
Canadian Bar Association British Columbia branch.
Mr. Holmes is an experienced
litigator and arbitration lawyer, and has previously served as President of the Trial Lawyers Association of B.C., as president of the BC
Civil Liberties Association, and on Provincial Council of the B.C. branch of the
Canadian Bar Association.