To be sure,
Canadian constitutional tradition is laden with denunciations — usually quite ignorant denunciations — of originalism.
Not exact matches
On a comparative level I found it interesting that they quote Lord Steyn and mention both the
Canadian and American
constitutional traditions, (though not the Australian), but all the cases cited are from the Indian Supreme Court itself.
Canadian constitutional law, being rooted in the liberal - democratic political
tradition, has inherited a particular, liberal conception of freedom as being conceptually limitless.
Professor Newman adds wants to bolster the propriety of using the «notwithstanding clause» by pointing out that «[i] t tracked a similar clause in the 1960
Canadian Bill of Rights... and was an important clause in bringing together different
constitutional traditions».