These funds invest primarily in the common shares of
Canadian domiciled gold or other precious metals producing, mining or exploration companies.
Moody's Canadian High Yield Toolkit is updated weekly, providing comprehensive information on more than 80
Canadian domiciled speculative - grade rated issuers.
The above illustrative example highlights the expected after - tax performance benefits of holding a TRI Canadian Equity ETF versus
another Canadian domiciled physically replicated Canadian Equity ETF in a non-registered account, assuming both ETFs earned / reflected a net 2 % dividend and track the exact same universe of stocks.
One thing that confuses me:
Canadian domiciled funds and ETFs pay U.S. withholding taxes on the underlying holdings, but
Canadian domiciled funds that are based on swaps like HXS do not (apparently).
Canadian domiciled mutual funds and ETFs show withholding taxes paid to foreign governments.
FT Portfolios Canada Co has filed a preliminary prospectus with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities to launch it's
Canadian domiciled ETFs as reported in their press release.
Assuming a 2 % dividend yield, the penalty is a rather significant 0.3 % p.a.
Canadian domiciled funds will only be suitable for taxable holdings.
In a RRSP account, it will still be advantageous to hold VTI because an investor can avoid withholding taxes paid by
Canadian domiciled funds but not registered accounts.
A Canadian domiciled VTI, VEA or VWO is therefore not ideal for a RRSP account.
As it happened, this was incorrect at the time, since they lacked
a Canadian domicile.
Not exact matches
We need a
Canadian complement to this innovation lobby, centred on
Canadian -
domiciled companies selling
Canadian ideas globally, to obtain the full commitment of federal politicians and policy - makers to act in ways that support their profitable growth.
RBC Vision Women's Leadership MSCI Canada Index ETF aims to replicate the performance of the MSCI Canada IMI Women's Leadership Select Index, a broad
Canadian equity markets index with a focus on companies
domiciled in Canada that exhibit a commitment towards women leadership among their board of directors and executive leadership positions.
Funds in the
Canadian Dividend & Income Equity category must have a stated mandate to invest primarily in income - generating securities and must invest at least 70 % of their equity holdings in securities
domiciled in Canada.
Canadian - and Mexican -
domiciled drivers will also be required to use ELDs when operating on U.S. roadways.
These don't apply to a US -
domiciled fund such as VOO, but the IRS takes a 15 % cut of all dividends paid to foreign investors, including
Canadian mutual funds and ETFs.
On this basis alone, US - listed global REIT ETFs appear to be more tax - efficient when held in an RRSP, and
Canadian -
domiciled global REIT mutual funds (that hold the underlying REITs) appear to be more tax - efficient when held in a non-registered account.
I'm with you on the TFSA — I'm trying to use it more for any UK
domiciled stocks and of course
Canadian stocks but the allure of the RRSP kickback and US stocks is so hard to avoid.
Funds in the
Canadian Small / Mid Cap Equity category must invest at least 90 % of their equity holdings in securities
domiciled in Canada, and their average market capitalization must be lower than the
Canadian small / mid cap threshold.
Funds in the
Canadian Dividend & Income Equity category must have a stated mandate to invest primarily in income - generating securities and must invest at least 70 % of their equity holdings in securities
domiciled in Canada.
What we've called «Level I» tax is levied by the countries where the stocks are
domiciled (in this case, European and Asian countries), while «Level II» is an additional 15 % withheld by the US government before the US - listed ETF pays the dividends to the
Canadian ETF.
Until now, domestic regulations have prohibited
Canadians from buying Vanguard mutual funds offered in the United States, the Post explains, so if it starts selling a new line of Canada -
domiciled Vanguard funds, it would have a huge impact on Canada's mutual - fund industry, which overwhelmingly consists of actively managed funds.
Funds in the
Canadian Equity category must invest at least 90 % of their equity holdings in securities
domiciled in Canada, and their average market capitalization must be greater than the
Canadian small / mid cap threshold.
Funds in the
Canadian Focused Equity category must invest at least 50 % and less than 90 % of their equity holdings in securities
domiciled in Canada, and their average market capitalization must be greater than the
Canadian small / mid cap threshold.
Apart from where they are
domiciled, how
Canadian are these companies?
And of course if you're in e-series or
Canadian -
domiciled ETFs then you can just have the same asset allocation across all accounts and sidestep the issue.
Because it is a US -
domiciled fund, you will receive a T5 rather than a T3 slip, and your
Canadian dividends will not be itemized.
@Be» en — if you're comfortable doing Norbert's gambit, holding US - listed global equity ETFs in your RRSP is still likely to be cheaper than holding
Canadian -
domiciled ones over the long term.
However,
Canadian -
domiciled funds such as HXT.U and ZSP - U are not, even though they are denominated in USD.
Returning to Australia... The Australian banks are an excellent group of companies that: (i) are
domiciled in a country with very high GDP per capita with excellent / extremely consistent economic performance (high GDP growth / last recession in 1991); (ii) have mid-teens ROE, near the top globally among developed economies; (iii) retain some of the highest capital ratios in the world (~ 15 % CET1 ratios, vs.
Canadian banks at ~ 11 %); and finally (iv) have very high and reliable dividend yields (between 7 - 9 %, generally).
Whenever I have attempted to resolve my citizenship issue, I am told my father could never have been a
Canadian citizen in 1947 because he was not «
domiciled within the country» for the years immediately preceding WWII, so I see that as the main justification for stripping citizenship in the last decade.
More specifically, the Cuba Order was issued to address specific US legislation which aims to prohibit the activities of US - controlled entities
domiciled outside the US, as they relate to Cuba (e.g.
Canadian affiliates of US companies).
I should perhaps have made things clearer by simply saying that
Canadian law is that the capacity to marry is determined by the law of the party's
domicile.
If we set the traditional rule aside, why would not other countries, and judge the marriages of
domiciled Canadians by their rules on capacity instead of by ours?
The first beneficiaries of this are
Canadians (by which I mean people
domiciled in Canada, whatever their citizenship) who have married someone of the same sex.
None of this would have any impact, I imagine, on the parties» jurisdiction of
domicile, where the local law would presumably still apply as to their capacity to marry; though what might be the case with
Canadian orders for, say, maintenance, I can't say.