AfricaGate — The IPCC claim that rising temperatures could cut in half agricultural yields in African countries turns out to have come from a 2003 paper published by
a Canadian environmental think tank — not a peer - reviewed scientific journal.
Thus, an analysis by
the Canadian environmental think tank Pembina Institute found that Keystone XL would be a «key driver for oilsands growth,» increasing production by 36 percent.
Not exact matches
The government and the oil and gas industry have spent lavishly to promote fossil fuel development, but a poll for the
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers found that only 51 % of us
think tar sands / oil sands development is worth the
environmental risk; 49 %
think it isn't.
«Assuming that technology will allow ever more shale gas production at low prices — and betting energy policy and the future energy security of the country on it — is risky business,» says geologist David Hughes, who retired from the
Canadian Geological Survey and is now doing assessments of shale gas and oil for the nonprofit Post Carbon Institute, a California - based
environmental think tank.
Still, in the main,
Canadians thought of themselves as the good guys on the
environmental front, striving often as not for a respectable middle ground — a prosperity built on the nation's extraordinary natural bounty that took the necessary steps not to exhaust it in the process.