Sentences with phrase «canadian judicial system»

A fairly recent article in the Huffington Post spoke at length regarding how the Canadian judicial system is viewed by one organization, in terms of the integrity of our process pertaining to the appointment of our Judges.

6Michael Posluns, «Specific Claims: The Alice in Wonderland Dimension of the Canadian Judicial System, Part 2», SLAW, (25 January 2012), online: < http://www.slaw.ca/2012/01/25/specific-claims-the-alice-in-wonderland-dimension-of-the-canadian-judicial-system-part-2/ >.

2Michael Posluns, «Aboriginal Land Claims: The Alice in Wonderland Dimension of the Canadian Judicial System», SLAW (27 October 2011), online: < http://www.slaw.ca/2011/10/27/aboriginal-land-claims-the-alice-in-wonderland-dimension-of-the-canadian-judicial-system/ >.

By May of 1999, the newly created Ontario Court of Justice had earned a particular place in the Canadian judicial system.

Counsel at DuMoulin Boskovich are experienced at handling diverse demands in dispute resolution and providing representation in all facets of litigation before all levels of the Canadian judicial system.

Judicial independence and impartiality are paramount in the Canadian judicial system.

The Ontario Provincial Police has mixed feelings on the event as it fell under a grey spot in the Canadian judicial system.

This Forum provided several glimpses of icebergs floating in the Canadian Judicial System.

The case is being decided in an era of the Canadian judicial system that is being defined by the SCC's Jordan decision, where the court put a ceiling of 18 months between charges and trial in a provincial court and of 30 months in other cases.

On the contrary the very qualities that won DIAND that award have, more recently, made Aboriginal land claims process, and particularly «specific claims» the Alice in Wonderland (AIW) of the Canadian Judicial System.

The Court needs to determine whether or not there is a crisis in public confidence in the Canadian judicial system.

Beyond its seminal history, today's Superior Court of Justice in Ontario holds a place of major importance in the Canadian judicial system.

The issue is the following: we don't want the appointment to the Canadian judicial system (all and any level) the kind knucledraggers the like of which is currently on display in the US: Alito, Scalia, Roberts and old Uncle Tom himself.

Not exact matches

If a Canadian entrepreneur has an idea with potential to generate great wealth, ownership of this idea will be decided in courts beyond Canada, by foreign judicial and geopolitical systems designed to make another country prosperous.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Alaska injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Georgia injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

This leaves Canadians vulnerable to strategic lawsuits against public participation through the privatization of fundamental civil and political rights in the judicial system.

Most Slaw readers will know that gavels simply aren't part of the equipment of Canadian or British judges — however much they may feature in the popular iconography of the American judicial system.

Maritime Broadcasting System Ltd. v. Canadian Media Guild 2014 FCA 59 Labour Law — Labour relations boards and judicial review — Judicial review — Standard of review The Canada Industrial Relations Board certified the Canadian Media Guild as the bargaining agent for employees of Maritime Broadcasting System Ltd. employed in its Maritime News Network operation in judicial review — Judicial review — Standard of review The Canada Industrial Relations Board certified the Canadian Media Guild as the bargaining agent for employees of Maritime Broadcasting System Ltd. employed in its Maritime News Network operation in Judicial review — Standard of review The Canada Industrial Relations Board certified the Canadian Media Guild as the bargaining agent for employees of Maritime Broadcasting System Ltd. employed in its Maritime News Network operation in Halifax.

Canadian society, in general, may take issue with particular decisions but as a whole appears to respect the judicial system (although most would probably like it to be more transparent, particularly the process for choosing new judges at almost every level of court).

The government has yet to name a replacement for Nadon J. With respect, it would be far more profitable for it and the Canadian legal system to go about naming a new judge rather than anonymously sniping about judicial decisions that displease it.

The Canadian system of government has three branches: judicial, executive, and legislative.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Tennessee injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a Missouri injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

The Canadian Judicial Council has produced this guide dealing with The Canadian Justice System and the Media

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a California injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

Despite lacking the force of law, the widely praised principles have been cited not only by Canadian judges, but also in judicial systems internationally.

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a North Carolina injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

Matter Commented On: Canadian Judicial Council Inquiry Committee Report Regarding Justice Robin Camp What role should empathy have in a system... Continue reading →

* Introduction to the firm's expectations, internal processes (submitting memos for review, etc.); * creating and recording a research plan / trail; research guides; organizing your research; * library resources and library tour; * intranet (ben.net) searching intranet and internet searching; tips and cautions; * organization, analysis and writing of BJ memos; * corporate precedents: data bank, and searching of; * Canadian Abridgement & CED: print and electronic version: searching (Carswell's rep does this); * MLB index system: using, searching online * internal memo bank: how it's indexed; how to search; * how to search periodical databases; * BJ oil & gas precedents: use of and searching; * how to do client specific research, analysis and memoranda; * research, writing of quantum memos; * QL databases, pricing and searching; * Statute research: finding, updating, judicial consideration (librarians teach this).

These are four federal organizations — they command the largest share of the Canadian legal and judicial sector, and their remit includes the broadest swathe of the Canadian legal system's user base.

Legalize and Regulate Marijuana WHEREAS, despite almost a century of prohibition, millions of Canadians today regularly consume marijuana and other cannabis products; WHEREAS the failed prohibition of marijuana has exhausted countless billions of dollars spent on ineffective or incomplete enforcement and has resulted in unnecessarily dangerous and expensive congestion in our judicial system; WHEREAS various marijuana decriminalization or legalization policy prescriptions have been recommended by the 1969 - 72 Commission of Enquiry into the Non-Medical Use of Drugs, the 2002 Canadian Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs, and the 2002 House of Commons Special Committee on the Non-Medical Use of Drugs; WHEREAS the legal status quo for the criminal regulation of marijuana continues to endanger Canadians by generating significant resources for gang - related violent criminal activity and weapons smuggling — a reality which could be very easily confronted by the regulation and legitimization of Canada's marijuana industry; BE IT RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will legalize marijuana and ensure the regulation and taxation of its production, distribution, and use, while enacting strict penalties for illegal trafficking, illegal importation and exportation, and impaired driving; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will invest significant resources in prevention and education programs designed to promote awareness of the health risks and consequences of marijuana use and dependency, especially amongst youth; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will extend amnesty to all Canadians previously convicted of simple and minimal marijuana possession, and ensure the elimination of all criminal records related thereto; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will work with the provinces and local governments of Canada on a coordinated regulatory approach to marijuana which maintains significant federal responsibility for marijuana control while respecting provincial health jurisdiction and particular regional concerns and practices.

In other words, incorporating machine learning capacities into ODR applications made available to the courts could go a long way in making the judicial system more accessible for all Canadians.

Legalize and Regulate Marijuana WHEREAS, despite almost a century of prohibition, millions of Canadians today regularly consume marijuana and other cannabis products; WHEREAS the failed prohibition of marijuana has exhausted countless billions of dollars spent on ineffective or incomplete enforcement and has resulted in unnecessarily dangerous and expensive congestion in our judicial system; WHEREAS

The following factors are considered in determining recognition and enforceability of a foreign injunction: (a) are the terms of the order clear and specific enough to ensure that the defendant will know what is expected; (b) is the order limited in its scope and did the originating court retain the power to issue further orders; (c) is the enforcement the least burdensome remedy for the Canadian justice system; (d) is the Canadian litigant exposed to unforeseen obligations; (e) are any third parties affected by the order; and (f) will the use of judicial resources be consistent with what would be allowed for domestic litigants.

The Canadian Judicial Council has an excellent primer on when media bans are used in Canada, and why, in The Canadian Justice System and the Media.

They each reflect Canadian courts» increasing inclination toward accepting jurisdiction over civil suits brought by foreign plaintiffs, who would otherwise be required to pursue their claims in a deficient, corrupt or unfair foreign judicial system.

As has worked in the past, when the neutral citation system for Canadian courts was created and adopted, and equally a uniform naming convention for Canadian judgments, I would suggest the work be entrusted to a core working group supported by an advisory board representative of all the affected communities: the Courts (and the Canadian Judicial Council), the law publishers both print and digital (especially CanLII and Lexum), legal writing and research faculty, law librarians and practising lawyers from both our French and English legal communities.

«If civil courts don't offer more judicial mediation — a quicker and cheaper way of resolving disputes than trials — the justice system will become less accessible and less relevant to most Canadians, he predicts.»

A Canadian site called, «Shared Parenting Forum», is full of material that bemoans the lack of equality experienced by men in the judicial system.