Not exact matches
Winners are
found this way: First, the Product of the Year Canada
jury carefully selects the finalists — that is, products that meet or exceed innovation standards — which are then categorized and judged by an online survey, on behalf of Rogers Insights and conducted by TNS, of thousands of regular
Canadian shoppers.
Kingston, Ontario (CNN)- A
Canadian jury Sunday convicted three members of a family of Afghan immigrants of the «honor» murders of four female relatives whose bodies were
found in an Ontario canal.
CNN: Family convicted in Canada «honor murders» A
Canadian jury Sunday convicted three members of a family of Afghan immigrants of the «honor» murders of four female relatives whose bodies were
found in an Ontario canal.
Despite the
jury finding, Google proceeded with a non-obstante application that they were not liable because they were not a publisher of the images, relying on cases from the UK, Metropolitan Schools Ltd v Designtechnica Corp»n [2011] 1 WLR 1743; Webb v Bloch [1928] HCA 50; Tamiz v Google Inc [2012] EWHC 449; and Bunt v Tilley [2006] EWHC 407, as well as the
Canadian Supreme Court decision in Crookes v Newton [2011] 3 SCR 269.
With this case,
Canadian law has rightly provided protection against defamation to an individual subjected to repeated published attacks on her reputation that were not only false as
found by the
jury's
findings of defamation, but which specifically defamed the plaintiff based on her status as a member of a racialized group.
The decision of the Supreme Court in Kokopenace was divided, with four of the seven judges
finding that despite the underinclusion of individuals living on reserves in the District of Kenora on
jury rolls, Mr. Kokopenace's right to a fair, impartial and representative
jury under the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was not violated.
A majority of the Ontario Court of Appeal ordered a new trial,
finding that Mr. Kokopenace's rights under sections 11 (d) and 11 (f) of the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms had been violated because the
jury roll from which his
jury was selected was not sufficiently representative.
In the
Canadian system, a
jury isn't required to give reasons for its
findings of fact.