Not exact matches
The contrast between a
Canadian law society's admission of a candidate who
plotted his entry into a profession built on trust and honesty, while mulling over his pleas to two criminal offences involving dishonesty and breach of trust, and the death of the honourable advocate of war criminals, racists, and
terrorists, struck me this summer as moral antipodes.
Lawyer believes deporting man accused of
plotting terrorist acts rather than prosecuting him «absurd»,
Canadian Press
The legislation raises a plethora of issues and significantly alters the security landscape: It gives the
Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) powers beyond intelligence gathering (to actively target threats and derail
plots); creates new offences (criminalizing «
terrorist propaganda» and the «promotion of terror»); lowers the legal threshold to trigger detention to those who may carry out an offence from the existing standard of will carry out to may carry out; extends preventive detention for «suspected»
terrorists from three days to seven days (inconsistent with the constitutional presumption of innocence); legally entrenches a no fly list; and grants government agencies explicit authority to share private information with domestic and foreign entities.