Sentences with phrase «capping charter school growth»

Capping charter school growth seemed to have been a priority for LAUSD Board Member Steve Zimmer until recently, when he twice postponed, then watered down, his controversial proposal that would have banned new charter schools.

Not exact matches

James Merriman, C.E.O. of the New York City Charter School Center, pounced on de Blasio's comments on Wednesday, arguing that charter schools «are some of the most accessible and effective public schools in New York City,» and their growth shouldn't be stunted by tCharter School Center, pounced on de Blasio's comments on Wednesday, arguing that charter schools «are some of the most accessible and effective public schools in New York City,» and their growth shouldn't be stunted by tcharter schools «are some of the most accessible and effective public schools in New York City,» and their growth shouldn't be stunted by the cap.

The scarcity of school buildings acts as a hard cap on growth, because no matter what other assets a charter school has, no building means no school.

By capping the number of charter schools statewide, limiting the annual growth in the number of schools per district, and providing for input from the local district before approval of charter applications, North Carolina has exercised more control over the establishment of charter schools than some states.

When the dust settled, some said that the teachers had won the battle over teacher evaluations, while others pointed out that they had lost the effort to cap the growth of charter schools.

For example, New York made some important adjustments to its cap to allow more charter public school growth in New York City and more charter - authorizing activity by the State University of New York.

The National Alliance for Public Charter Schools report finds that 13 states continue to cap the growth of charter schools, while another 11 states have yet to enact laws establishing public charter sCharter Schools report finds that 13 states continue to cap the growth of charter schools, while another 11 states have yet to enact laws establishing public charter sSchools report finds that 13 states continue to cap the growth of charter schools, while another 11 states have yet to enact laws establishing public charter scharter schools, while another 11 states have yet to enact laws establishing public charter sschools, while another 11 states have yet to enact laws establishing public charter scharter schoolsschools.

The article's author, James A. Peyser, explains that even though Boston Public Schools and the Boston Alliance for Charter Schools affirmed their commitment in September 2011 to «[provide] all Boston students and families with improved schools and broader choice, [through] a new culture of collaboration between the district and charter schools,» charter school growth is stymied by the state cap, which limits students who attend charter schools to 9 percent of the total public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes Schools and the Boston Alliance for Charter Schools affirmed their commitment in September 2011 to «[provide] all Boston students and families with improved schools and broader choice, [through] a new culture of collaboration between the district and charter schools,» charter school growth is stymied by the state cap, which limits students who attend charter schools to 9 percent of the total public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes Charter Schools affirmed their commitment in September 2011 to «[provide] all Boston students and families with improved schools and broader choice, [through] a new culture of collaboration between the district and charter schools,» charter school growth is stymied by the state cap, which limits students who attend charter schools to 9 percent of the total public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes Schools affirmed their commitment in September 2011 to «[provide] all Boston students and families with improved schools and broader choice, [through] a new culture of collaboration between the district and charter schools,» charter school growth is stymied by the state cap, which limits students who attend charter schools to 9 percent of the total public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes schools and broader choice, [through] a new culture of collaboration between the district and charter schools,» charter school growth is stymied by the state cap, which limits students who attend charter schools to 9 percent of the total public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes charter schools,» charter school growth is stymied by the state cap, which limits students who attend charter schools to 9 percent of the total public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes schools,» charter school growth is stymied by the state cap, which limits students who attend charter schools to 9 percent of the total public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes charter school growth is stymied by the state cap, which limits students who attend charter schools to 9 percent of the total public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes charter schools to 9 percent of the total public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes schools to 9 percent of the total public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes Boston.

«Boston and the Charter School Cap: Politics halts growth at top - notch schools,» is now available on the Education Next website, www.educationnext.org.

And earlier this year, U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said states «that do not have public charter laws or put artificial caps on the growth of charter schools will jeopardize their applications.»

When the charter school cap was lifted in North Carolina in 2011, it set the stage for dramatic growth in the state's charter sector — and growth in tension between charters and traditional schools.

North Carolina has a high growth rate since the charter school cap was expanded in 2011.

The arbitrary cap on the number of charter schools that can open in New York continues to prohibit growth.

Moreover, with an estimated 1 million student names on charter waiting lists (Kern & Gebru, 2014) combined with federal incentives and evolving state policies aimed at raising or removing caps on charter schools, the sector seems poised for rapid growth in the near future.

The bill, AB 401 by Assemblymember Tom Ammiano, would impose an automatic cap of charter schools in districts across the state, hindering the tremendous growth charter schools have achieved in California over the past decade.

Michigan also lifted its charter school cap in 2011, leading to rapid charter growth.

Since the state lifted its charter school cap in 2011, Charlotte has seen rapid growth in new and existing charter schools, as well as a handful of failures.

If they can't do that, they will reinforce the case for capping charter growth and protecting the traditional school district, which, regardless of its many failures, accepts responsibility for educating all children no matter how challenging.

Growth in some states is tamped by laws that cap the number of charter schools.

It offers a prime example of the challenge that restrictive charter school caps pose to the growth of high - quality charter schools.

The research is particularly important given the rapid growth of the charter sector since the state lifted the charter school cap in 2011.

Because of the potential for these caps to restrict the growth of high - quality charter schools, the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools (NAPCS) recommends that states not restrict the number of charter schools, their enrollment, or the locales in which charter schools cacharter schools, the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools (NAPCS) recommends that states not restrict the number of charter schools, their enrollment, or the locales in which charter schools caschools, the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools (NAPCS) recommends that states not restrict the number of charter schools, their enrollment, or the locales in which charter schools caCharter Schools (NAPCS) recommends that states not restrict the number of charter schools, their enrollment, or the locales in which charter schools caSchools (NAPCS) recommends that states not restrict the number of charter schools, their enrollment, or the locales in which charter schools cacharter schools, their enrollment, or the locales in which charter schools caschools, their enrollment, or the locales in which charter schools cacharter schools caschools can open.

Specifically, a case study on Boston highlights how restrictive charter school caps can impede the growth of a high - quality charter sector; a case study on Denver illustrates the potential and challenges of district - charter collaboration; a case study on New Orleans describes how a city can embrace chartering and alternative governing structures to bring about improved opportunities for students; and a case study on Washington, D.C. illustrates how a well - developed city ecosystem can support a large charter market share.

Proponents contend that caps help limit the growth of the sector, and thus control the overall quality of charter schools (by encouraging authorizers to be more discerning in approving applications and more rigorous in closing low - performing schools).79 On the other hand, opponents argue that charter school caps stifle the growth of high - quality schools and may deter high - performing operators from even applying to operate in the state.

The city of Boston (see Case Study: Impact of State Charter Caps in Boston, Massachusetts) is a prime example of how charter school caps can limit the growth of high - quality charter sCharter Caps in Boston, Massachusetts) is a prime example of how charter school caps can limit the growth of high - quality charter schoCaps in Boston, Massachusetts) is a prime example of how charter school caps can limit the growth of high - quality charter scharter school caps can limit the growth of high - quality charter schocaps can limit the growth of high - quality charter scharter schools.

In the early years of chartering, many state legislatures placed caps on growth as a way to maintain control over the quality of the schools.

Consider that beginning in 2011, lawmakers removed the cap on public charter schools; since that time, North Carolina has experienced nearly 75 percent growth in these schools.

Charter schools in New York are providing the «seeds of change» for traditional schools, and state officials should not cap their future growth but provide them with more funding, a recent report by a Washington think tank concludes...

This year, the General Assembly lifted a cap that limited charter school growth, a move that enhanced the state's Race to the Top application to win up to $ 75 million in federal education aid.

This cap represents a clearly - defined limit of charter growth in the state, designed to strategically target communities with underperforming district schools and limit charter presence in communities with high - performing district schools.