Without that correlation, the high sensitivity water vapour feedback driven
catastrophic anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is effectively dead in the water.
Not exact matches
Scientists proposing
catastrophic majority
anthropogenic global warming models (a.k.a. «Climate change») bear the burden of proof of providing clear robust evidence supporting validated model predictions of
anthropogenic warming with strong significant differences from this climatic null
hypothesis.
However, when comparing model outputs against Hurst climate persistence, I find that the
catastrophic majority
anthropogenic global warming hypothesis to be formally «Not Proven» per Bray (2005), and Johnson (2013).
The
catastrophic anthropogenic (i.e. man - made)
global warming (CAGW)
hypothesis has four components.
One of the major tenets of the
anthropogenic hypothesis of
global warming is that the number of extremely hot days would increase, potentially causing
catastrophic loss of life.
The orthodox
anthropogenic hypothesis of
catastrophic global warming that much of high - level governmental policy - making is based on, is for all practical purposes, invalidated.