At the Catholic schools they learn that
their Catechism teaches that Mortal sin is dependent on «intention».
The Catechism teaches that «like Baptism, which it completes, confirmation is given only once, for it too imprints on the soul an indelible spiritual mark, the «character» which is the sign that Jesus Christ has marked a Christian with the seal of his Spirit by clothing him with power from on high so that he may be his witness».20 Baptism, confirmation and the Eucharist are seen as forming a unity (CCC 1306).
The Catechism teaches clearly that man is «the only creature on earth that God has willed for its own sake» (n. 356, cf. also 358), and affirms the uniquely human spiritual soul in n. 363 ff.
As the Westminster Shorter
Catechism teaches, man's purpose is to glorify God and to enjoy Him forever.
And this is what
the Catechism teaches: The question about the origins of the world and of man has been the object of many scientific studies which have splendidly enriched our knowledge of the age and dimensions of the cosmos, the development of life - forms and the appearance of man.
Both the Second Vatican Council and
the Catechism teach that it is: «The Eucharist is a sacrifice because it re-presents (makes present) the sacrifice of the Cross, because it is its memorial and because it applies its fruit.»
Not exact matches
I only mention that so it will be obvious that I am familiar with how the Catholics
teach the bible and their perspective on faith via the
catechism.
In short, his actions were very un-Christ-like and not in line with the
catechism I was
taught for almost 17 years.
But the details of his pastoral implementation lead to dangerous and irreconcilable deviations from the tradition, especially with respect to John Paul's important
teaching documents Familiaris Consortio, The
Catechism of the Catholic Church and Veritatis Splendor.
YOUR
Catechism and Moral Theology
teaches that INTENTION is the crux of a moral act.
A
Catechism for Business: Tough Ethical Questions and Insights from Catholic
Teaching, edited by Andrew V. Abela and Joseph E. Capizzi (Catholic University of America Press): Catholic social teaching remains a mystery to many Catholics (and an ideological plaything for
Teaching, edited by Andrew V. Abela and Joseph E. Capizzi (Catholic University of America Press): Catholic social
teaching remains a mystery to many Catholics (and an ideological plaything for
teaching remains a mystery to many Catholics (and an ideological plaything for others).
Her detailed study highlights the importance of an engaged laity and shows the importance of strong episcopal leadership, and, although she resists the conclusion, she demonstrates the effectiveness of memorizing a
catechism in
teaching basic principles.
The enthusiasm required for forming ourselves in the faith of the Church and thus, the
teaching of the Lord Jesus that a study of this
catechism brings can perhaps be summed up in the words of the Cure of Ars.
«The most important book published by the Holy See in this generation for Catholic education,» says Bishop O'Donoghue, «is theCatechism of the Catholic Church, and its summary, the Compendium of the
Catechism of the Catholic Church»; he says that «it is vital that both the Catechismand the Compendiumare used by teachers in our schools and colleges, who can guide pupils in how to make best use of them»; that «the key to unlocking this treasury of Church
teaching....
There is a great mystery here, but The
Catechism of the Catholic Church
teaches that «God permitted such painful upheavals as the angels» fall and man's sin only as occasions and means for displaying all the power of his arm and the whole measure of the love he wanted to give the world» (CCC 760).
lies in the
Catechism itself»; and that «It is important not to pick and choose which doctrines of the Church to
teach children, particularly very young ones.
Well documented, her sources include the Gospels, the
Catechism of the Catholic Church, papal
teachings and writings of the saints.
Atheists actually do have beliefs and doctrines; it was
taught in the USSR just like
catechism is
taught in a Roman Catholic school.
And I wonder how many RE teachers not only possess a copy of the
Catechism, but use it as a constant
teaching resource?
The
Catechism of the Catholic Church
teaches that couples must have «just» reasons to delay childbearing.
The Cardinal's response was based on Catholic
teaching - which according to the
Catechism of the Catholic Church (para 2357) is that
He concludes that, since «sexual union is not part of the essence of marriage, as the
Catechism of the Council of Trent and Vatican II
teach, consequently, the exercise of the sexual act between divorced and [civilly] remarried couples does not harm the existing sacramental bond.»
The Roman
Catechism, issued in 1566, three years after the end of the Council of Trent,
taught that the power of life and death had been entrusted by God to civil authorities and that the use of this power, far from involving the crime of murder, is an act of paramount obedience to the fifth commandment.
They did not substitute for a
catechism, and they certainly did not equal the Leonine practice of encyclical
teaching, which was more effective, both ad extra and ad intra.
In a sense, the
catechisms of early Protestantism were attempts to return to the ways of the early church, for which such
teaching and learning were very important.
This hubris is in contradistinction to the clear
teaching of the
Catechism of the Catholic Church» for the
Catechism, while assuming a serious dialogue among government officials, just war analysts, and the public, nonetheless
teaches (at § 2309) that «the evaluation of these [just war] conditions for moral legitimacy belongs to the prudential judgment of those who have responsibility for the common good.»
actually do some REAL research and STUDY what it
teaches in the
Catechism of the Cathilc Church.
The epitome of the Church's
teaching on immigration is found in No. 2241 of the
Catechism of the Catholic Church, which states: «The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and the means of livelihood which he can not find in his country of origin.
He can, with no qualms, assent to any of the
catechisms of historical Christianity, but for some reason thinks God is wrong when he
teaches love of enemies, therefore rejecting that
teaching.
You might check out Luther's Small
Catechism on line, it
teaches the basics nicely, and I have memorized it, when I was older.
Ultimately it is indeed hard to see the proper place of doctrinal
teaching as captured by the
Catechism and emphasised by Fit for Mission?
As a small project, why not photocopy those words from the
Catechism, and send the copy to your Member of Parliament with a brief note, saying that this is the message that you will be
teaching the children in your Confirmation group / parish youth group / RE class and you would like an assurance that it is not against the law to do so?
Instead of using the Church's own
teaching and approach, summed up in the
Catechism of the Catholic Church, the CES imagines that it is better to use the ideology which has dominated Catholic education in England and Wales for too long and with woeful results.
TERTULLIAN, THE FLESH AND ORTHODOXY Dear Father Editor While I can only share your Carthusian correspondent's enthusiasm for the
Catechism of the Catholic Church as a sure guide to the Church's
teachings, I read — with some surprise — in his comments on the letters I wrote to you in 2007 that I am supposed to hold suspect, or even possibly unorthodox, «any text» that cites Tertullian.
Every section contains a brief summary or quotation from The Compendiumtogether with other authoritative sources, such as the
teaching of the popes, and wide and frequent references to the Bible, Canon Law, and the full
Catechism.
That is very laudable and fully in accord with the
teaching of the Church in the
Catechism in article 2358, cited on page 72 of the book.
It emerges with stark clarity that the Soho Masses are built on the unshakeable foundation of a belief that what the Church
teaches, as defined in the
Catechism of the Catholic Church and other manifestations of the Magisterium, is not to be taken seriously as an expression of what Catholics ought to believe.
Herbert McCabe O.P., who left all reference to the soul out of his
catechism, The
Teaching of the Catholic Church.
It is also the onlyCatholic programme which I've seen which sets out the Church's moral
teaching from the
Catechism on masturbation and homosexuality, subjects which are frequently ignored by Catholic education programmes as too hard to
teach in the current climate.
I've been to Catholic churches that seem much more focused on
teaching their rules, their
catechism and are much less focused on the New Testament and the
teachings of Jesus.
«4 It seemed reasonable in the sixteenth century that parents could be expected to
teach catechism to their children at home and that families would pray together.
Catholics who read Porta Fidei in the light of the documents of Vatican II can see how consistent it is with Council
teaching, and also with the
Catechism and with the project of a faith - filled pastoral and evangelising programme, these being the three main criteria that Pope Benedict proposes for the Year of Faith.
«The Roman Catholic reader of this
Catechism will learn little, if anything, of the Reformation debates over this matter or of Protestant sensitivities over Roman Catholic
teaching.
It's like they've never bothered to challenge their brains over the idea of «death to self» that is
taught time and again in both scripture as well as other Christian traditions such as the
catechism.
Many Presbyterians, for example, no longer found the standard Calvinist
teachings on double predestination and limited atonement compelling, and efforts were made to alter the Westminster Shorter
Catechism to reflect a «modern» point of view.
It is useful to recall a simple fact: in years past, much Christian education, including the
teaching of the
catechism, took place in a wide range of institutions: the home, common school, congregation and university.
Teaching of the
catechism was to take place in a number of settings: home, school, university and congregation.
It is not difficult to imagine a
catechism for children
teaching them the biblical narrative and helping them construct a sense of the whole that goes beyond the bits and pieces of scripture which they typically are
taught.
Teaching of the
catechism is not a cure for the ills currently besetting the church, but it can represent the starting point of a movement toward reforms that are desperately needed.
Drawing on the humanists» assumptions about
teaching and learning, the Reformers viewed the
catechism as a kind of classic text to be internalized through imitation and practice.