Not exact matches
The Archbishop
of Edinburgh and St Andrews has told a prominent English
Catholic theologian she can not lecture on
Church property because
of her
views on gay marriage.
I'm
catholic and believe in the religion's core teachings (namely the Gospels), but I've had enough
of the ultra-conservative
views of the
church.
And keep in mind that Gerhard Lenski was
of a very Protestant, almost Barthian,
view that biblical religion is at war with the religion
of communal - institution adherence epitomized by the
Catholic Church.
The
Catholic destabilization following the Council was advanced by liberal and progressive forces in the
Church, but it had the unexpected consequence
of making Catholicism, in the
view of evangelicals, less the monolithic threat that they feared.
But we can say, for example, that a religious, theological point
of view can illuminate scientific research and can help to extract some coherent meaning... In the
Catholic Church, we have a theology
of creation whose point
of view... gives to evolution an additional meaning which is not directly present in thescientific research, but that scientific research is coherent with this point
of view.
Though they were generally regular, faithful members
of Catholic services (until the Reformation), they seem to have
viewed the worldly
Church establishment in its wealth and power as corrupt.
In 1967, Anthony Burgess, author
of «A Clockwork Orange,» described the pain
of being an apostate: «It is with no indifferent eye that I
view the flood
of worshippers pouring into the
Catholic church... I want to be one
of them, but wanting is not enough.»
The
Catholic Church endorses a very narrow
view of birth control that 90 %
of women in American (and 89 %
of women who identify as
Catholic, according to the latest Gallup poll) disagree with.
I avoid envying the believer, but it is with no indifferent eye that I
view the flood
of worshippers pouring into the
Catholic church at the corner
of my street.
«After the Protestant Reformation and the subsequent Roman
Catholic Council at Trent, Catholics tended to narrow their
view of the
church to just the Roman
Catholic church and leave it to the pope to tell them what the consensus is.
«The challenge», wrote Father Alexander Lucie - Smith in his
Catholic Herald blog shortly after the Holy Father had announced his resignation, «will be in having to watch the airwaves fill with a whole load
of people who are very marginal to
Church life, and yet who will be invited to pontificate on all matters papal and religious, giving it their own particular slant, which they will advance as a mainstream
view.»
The pope's shortsighted
views on gay marriage as being such a terrible scourge are more evidence that the
Catholic Church is completely out
of step with the events
of the world.
As for the
Church's social justice
views — Allen mentions conservative criticism
of Caritas in Veritate (while overlooking the many conservatives who applauded it)-- I wrote two separate columns for the Times
of London online a) praising the essentials
of that specific encyclical, and Benedict's economic and social justice teachings in general; and b) saluting Archbishop Oscar Romero, who I believe will one day be declared a saint, precisely as a champion
of Catholic social justice.
But the orthodoxy
of a
Catholic theologian should not be suspect only because he does his duty honestly and weighing his own
views, remaining in an open dialogue with the magisterium and prepared to leave the last word to the authorities
of the
Church, always lovingly adapting his individual under - standing
of the faith to that
of the whole
Church.
When I talk to my good friend who is a very conservative
Catholic who
views taking communion as sacred and every crumb is representative
of Christ's body and not one crumb will drop... then compare it to how we do it at
church... everyone ripping bread from the same loaf, crumbs everywhere, kids spilling the «wine»... does it really matter... is one more right than the other... one upholds
church law on how communion will be performed versus our laid back version.
In the first place it can be taken as axiomatic in the
Catholic view of faith that where the
Church's magisterium has once unambiguously required at any time an absolute, ultimate and unconditional assent
of faith to a definite doctrine as revealed by God, the doctrine in question is no longer subject to revision and is irrevocable.
Anyone familiar with the Eastern Christian world knows that the Orthodox
view of the
Catholic Church is often a curious mélange
of fact, fantasy, cultural prejudice, sublime theological misunderstanding, resentment, reasonable disagreement, and unreasonable dread: it sees a misty phantasmagoria
of crusades, predestination, «modalism,» a God
of wrath, flagellants, Grand Inquisitors, and those blasted Borgias.
The interview, released by Jesuit magazines in several different languages and 16 countries on Thursday, offers perhaps the most expansive and in - depth
view of Francis» vision for the Roman
Catholic Church.
As one Roman
Catholic writer was at pains to point out for the benefit
of the pope in
view of Khomeini's approach, the
church does not live in the Middle Ages, and Muslims ought to be told so.
By refuses to evolve, the
Catholic Church is as good as denying the possibility
of continuing divine revelation which, when
viewed in a certain light, is as good as saying God is dead to humanity for all intents and purposes.
And one
of its themes in particular makes it timely, in
view of the challenges currently facing the
Catholic Church.
Catholic theology was generally based on the
view that outside the
church there is no salvation, though a gradual opening up towards others began after the «discovery» by Columbus
of the New World in the Americas in 1492, and the opening
of the route to the East after Vasco da Gama in 1498.
I am still not sure whether this was one among many examples
of his famously weird sense
of humour; was he offering an oblique parody
of the prevailing Anglican (and secular)
view of the
Catholic attitude to sexual questions: that the
Catholic Church, being run by ignorant celibate clergymen, is intrinsically hostile to all sexual activity, indeed to all sexual feelings
of any kind?
His lecture is sprinkled with expressions such as «the
church leadership argues that...»; «the Church maintains that...»; and «the Church's position is...» We are clearly given to understand that he is not merely expressing his own views or speaking in his capacity as the archbishop of Los Angeles but is speaking for the Catholic C
church leadership argues that...»; «the
Church maintains that...»; and «the Church's position is...» We are clearly given to understand that he is not merely expressing his own views or speaking in his capacity as the archbishop of Los Angeles but is speaking for the Catholic C
Church maintains that...»; and «the
Church's position is...» We are clearly given to understand that he is not merely expressing his own views or speaking in his capacity as the archbishop of Los Angeles but is speaking for the Catholic C
Church's position is...» We are clearly given to understand that he is not merely expressing his own
views or speaking in his capacity as the archbishop
of Los Angeles but is speaking for the
Catholic ChurchChurch.
More than one - third say they value the pope's
view on theology, and 3 in 10 say he has improved their
view of the
Catholic Church.
For 43 percent
of Protestant pastors, Pope Francis has not changed their
views of the
Catholic Church.
Steinfels» recent book, A People Adrift: The Crisis
of the Roman
Catholic Church inAmerica, looks back longingly to what he
views as the inspiring leadership
of such figures as Joseph Cardinal Bernardin
of Chicago and Rembert Weakland
of Milwaukee, and laments the era
of John Paul II and Ratzinger, now become Benedict XVI.
Somehow, because
of these two issues, the
Catholic Church is now
viewed as conservative.
We can rue and remember with nostalgia the time when «
Catholic» meant generally one sort
of writer, but in my
view both the
Church and its literature are far better off with far more practitioners making far more sorts
of art.
In the late 1980s, shortly before I entered into full communion with the
Catholic Church, Professor Cullman and I had an exchange on his
views regarding the future
of ecumenism as «communion in diversity.»
The Ukrainian
Catholic Church, more than the three Orthodox
churches, has been influenced by the experience
of Western Christians and thus takes a different
view of the relationship
of the
Church to the ethnos or nation.
Some people are predicting conflict and maybe even a division in the Roman
Catholic Church because
of differing
views...
As a former
Catholic, I still have lots
of issues with the
Church and its
views surrounding family planning and women.
The so - called Tridentine rite,
of course, far from being «medieval» has roots deep in pre-medieval antiquity (it is in any case a strange
view of history in which the Counter-Reformation took place in the middle ages), and is a living manifestation
of the Newmanian principle
of development, wherebya process
of continuous change is inevitable if the essence
of the
Church's faith is to remain the same: for, as The
Catholic Herald pointed out in its admirable leader, the reforms
of Pope St Pius V, enshrined in the Missal
of 1570, itself containing ancient elements, «were inspired by the Council
of Trent.
What the Jamesian
view of religion as personal further obscures is the quintessentially
Catholic notion
of the
church as a «sacramental communion» through which God's life penetrates ours.
She continues: «The justification for the literal iconoclasm in
Catholic churches could hardly have been more clearly expressed by Cromwell's Roundheads after they had systematically beheaded every image in the Lady Chapel
of Ely Cathedral or smashed all the stained glass windows at Canterbury, although Cromwell's soldiers were undoubtedly responsible for destroying far fewer sacred images than the liturgical «experts» who imposed their
views of renewal on the
Catholic churches across America.»
For 1500 years the
Church, both Orthodox and
Catholic had a synergistic
view of the relationship between Grace and nature.
clearly signals
Catholic theology's exposure to Protestant
views of revelation in which the theme
of God's Word, rather than
Church magisterium and tradition, is given primacy.
The
Catholic Church's
view on sexuality is likely to be a key rhetorical, legal and moral battering ram against the freedom
of the
Church in the UK.
This document, in the
view of some who have political knowledge, has done more damage to the
Catholic Church in England than anything else since the Reformation.
The previous November, Pope Benedict had made his
views on the position
of the French
Catholic Church regarding the threatened new legislation absolutely clear.
As Anderson shows, all the best and true
Catholic reformers — whatever their political
views or prudential decisions — were always strong proponents
of established
Church doctrine, and fierce disciplinarians when it came to upholding
Church teaching, particularly in the area
of sexual morality (a main target
of today's «reformers»).
Nor would it be difficult to show that the mainline
churches, Protestant and
Catholic, that have provided the religious framework for the traditional morality, are in disarray, have declining income and attendance, and themselves are the objects
of the same suspicion with which all established institutions are
viewed.
If with this we associate the usual «
catholic»
view that a priest is especially assigned the responsibility
of administering the sacraments
of the
Church and in particular the celebration
of the Eucharist, we have a proper setting or context for the labor
of proclamation.
This rejectionism had, over time, crystallized — some would say, fossilized — into the
view that the legal establishment
of the
Catholic Church as the official religion
of the state was the desired arrangement (the «thesis,» in the theological jargon
of the day), while other arrangements (like the American constitutional order) were mere «hypotheses» that could, under certain historical circumstances, be «tolerated» — even as Catholics in countries governed by the «hypothesis» worked for the day when the «thesis»
of Catholic establishment could be....
In the
view of many thoughtful Catholics, the failure to address effectively the scandal
of Catholic politicians who publicly reject the
Church's teaching on the gospel
of life is gravely undermining the credibility
of episcopal authority.
Of course, many outsiders
view the
Catholic and Protestant
churches, and even not - so - orthodox religious communities as «insular.»
The same God is the author
of our natural intellect as well as revelation, as classical
Catholic theology so often reminds us, so we should not be surprised if what the
Church teaches makes wonderful sense also just from a purely natural point
of view and people end up doing what the
Church recommends, not because she recommends it, but just because it is the most sensible thing to do.
What is really sad is that you do not research and study
Church teaching on indulgences.You are a Dr with a narrow
view of Catholic Teaching.
In John Tombler and Hubert Funk's The Raptured: A
Catholic View of the Latter Days and the Second Coming (the authors are professors at Seton Hall and the book bears the imprimatur
of Bishop John Doughty), we have adherence to the return
of the Jews to Palestine in the end time and a rapture
of the
Church.