In other words, they were allowed to teach
the Catholic view on these matters, but only as one option among many, and not as if it were actually true.
To argue that the CES compromise was at least better than not to be allowed even to teach
the Catholic view on these matters is nonsense.
Not exact matches
«The challenge», wrote Father Alexander Lucie - Smith in his
Catholic Herald blog shortly after the Holy Father had announced his resignation, «will be in having to watch the airwaves fill with a whole load of people who are very marginal to Church life, and yet who will be invited to pontificate
on all
matters papal and religious, giving it their own particular slant, which they will advance as a mainstream
view.»
When I talk to my good friend who is a very conservative
Catholic who
views taking communion as sacred and every crumb is representative of Christ's body and not one crumb will drop... then compare it to how we do it at church... everyone ripping bread from the same loaf, crumbs everywhere, kids spilling the «wine»... does it really
matter... is one more right than the other... one upholds church law
on how communion will be performed versus our laid back version.
However, inasmuch as my personal opposition to this practice is rooted in a sectarian (
Catholic) religious belief in the sanctity of human life, I am unwilling to impose it
on others who may, as a
matter of conscience, take a different
view.
is to understand why the evangelicals could have come to the
view that their own emphases were more likely to be conserved and stated with a more positively biblical note
on such
matters as proclamation and witness by the Roman
Catholic Church than by the WCC».16