Climate Lessons: Repairing the Damage to Children
Caused by Climate Alarmists: a letter from Ken Haapala
«The Idea of Renewable Energy Is Reported to Have Originated with the Nazis; at Least They Were Wise Enough to Reject It The Real Potential Climate Problem Is
Caused by the Climate Alarmists Themselves»
«The Real Potential Climate Problem Is
Caused by the Climate Alarmists Themselves How the Democratic Party Has Incurred Major Electoral Losses by Its Mistaken Support for Climate Alarmism»
Not exact matches
Amid the constant
alarmist bickering over the role of CO2 in our planet's continued shifting of
climate whether
caused or accelerated
by human activity and similar hair splitting, the true threats to our status - quo go un-heralded as the siren of alarm numbs our sensibilities.
From the angry tone of your comment, I suspect that you accept the
climate alarmists» propaganda that ocean warming is
caused by «excess heat from ghgs».
For example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science and that there is no circumstantial evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks — and, not understanding that
climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing and that the
climate change we observed can be explained
by natural
causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that and the fact that global warming
alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor most of the principles upon which the country was founded.
As heat waves move across the U.S. from the northeast to the southwest and in much of western Europe,
climate alarmists are responding predictably
by blaming hot temperatures not on true meteorological
causes but on the nebulous bogeyman of «
climate change.»
Climate alarmists have long insisted that global temperatures are primarily determined
by human -
caused emissions of CO2 and that natural forces play little or no role.
Climate alarmists now say the infamous Exxon Valdez oil spill — that multiple investigations said was
caused by an inebriated captain and a crew that failed to follow proper protocol steering the vessel through Alaska's Prince William Sound — is somehow linked to our SUV's and smokestacks.
There has been no global warming since the lad was in kindergarten, but the poor boy doesn't know that - and he's been so terrorized
by the
climate alarmists into believing that advanced western lifestyles are the
cause of all the world's woes that he's terrified even to run the cold tap and have a glass of water.
Despite trends in the actual
climate data and the failure of models to accurately depict reality, many
alarmists still argue that carbon mitigation policies are necessary to combat damages
caused by future
climate change.
To date, the electric utility industry has aided and abetted the
climate alarmist cause, if not
by actually lobbying for global warming regulation, then at least
by its willingness to entertain such regulation as public policy worthy of serious consideration.
After a series of embarrassing predictions and wild factual errors damaged global - warming
alarmists» credibility — possibly beyond repair — the United Nations is again warning of impending doom: localized floods and droughts
caused by climate change theoretically linked to human activity.
For this reason (among others), it's been difficult to peddle the
alarmists» allegations about how anthropogenic carbon dioxide could —
by way of the «greenhouse gas» effect —
cause any significant (or even measurable) effect on the Earth's
climate among the hard speculative fiction aficionados.
The current proposition offered
by climate alarmists is that if people who live in the more wealthy countries cut back their use of fossil fuels and therefore their human -
caused CO2 emissions that the world can avoid the alleged catastrophic increases in temperatures based on the
climate models.
Susan Crockford is a polar bear expert with a message that
climate alarmists don't want to hear: polar bear populations are thriving and are certainly in no danger from thinning summer sea ice supposedly
caused by «man - made global warming.»
Critics say that some aspects of the projected effects are «
alarmist», such as the impact on conflict and migration
caused by climate change.
Meanwhile, the abandonment of scientific perspective
by some
Alarmists in order to join the crusade to
climate Jerusalem gives tacit permission to continue to those who are
causing the real damage via habitat loss, pollution, lax procedures that allow invasive species to be introduced inappropriately, and over-hunting.
It seems to me that a rational agenda on the part of
climate alarmists should either be to disprove the Wallace et al. studies or to implement actions that would carry out the conclusions suggested
by the research (most importantly, abandoning efforts to reduce human -
caused emissions of CO2).
So although it has been taken for granted
by global warming
alarmists that human activity has
caused the
climate to warm, Svensmark's study strongly challenges this assumption.
Instead of publicly expressing their views, a group of parliamentarians said skeptics should parrot the imploding official narrative: The notion that global warming, which even leading
alarmists admit has been on «pause» for 17 years in defiance of every UN
climate model, is
caused by human activities and requires planetary carbon taxes and more government control.