Sentences with phrase «change debate continues»

-LSB-...] simply improving the clarity of scientific information will not dispel public conflict so long as the climate - change debate continues to feature cultural meanings that divide citizens of opposing world - views.

Not exact matches

As the quality of life between East and West slowly merges due to advances in technology, continued urbanization and changing demographics, opportunities across numerous industries will arise which we aim to point out and debate.

There is a continuing debate that really Newman advocated a changing Church, quoting his famous phrase that «to live is to change and to be perfect is to have changed often».

But despite this new space for a major public debate about fundamental change, serious political challenges to the system — from «Occupy» protestors, community activists, environmentalists and others — have thus far been contained by the continuing sense of a lack of viable alternatives.

How have the senate rules been changed to allow for a filibuster without continued debate?

There was not legislative text presented at the meeting as lawmakers continued to debate what changes would be made.

Big change will continue to be debated — some hope a reformed second chamber would help to unite the increasingly fragmented UK.

The party needs to debate whether in the absence of such further changes, and considering the substantial changes already underway on the NHS front - line, the Bill can retain Lib Dem support — the Social Liberal Forum will continue to support the likes of Graham Winyard, Charles West, Evan Harris and Shirley Williams as they seek to secure that debate.

While the debate continues between the Oneida Indian Nation and the Washington Redskins regarding the team's name and mascot, in upstate New York, several institutions faced similar decisions more than a decade ago and did change their names.

As early as 1918, the TUC debated whether to continue to co-operate with the Labour Party following changes to the constitution to allow Party membership to non-unionists.

Or should it continue to be more of an advisory body, with the right to debate important issues, call ministers to account, and ask (but not require) MPs to change their minds?

The news of the engagement has intensified a debate on whether the law should be changed so women born into the imperial family can continue in their royal roles.

But the debate continues with the pro-choice groups still calling for the changes sought by the 2008 amendments and the pro-life groups still seeking a reduction in the abortion time limit.

«We can debate the exact numbers which will be different for each taxpayer, but the bottom line is that hardworking Western New Yorkers have a lot to lose in both the Senate and House legislation which continues to change by the minute,» Kennedy said.

The only thing that is clear is that there continues to be great debate and uncertainty among these experts regarding the extent of natural climate variability versus human impacts, and what, if anything, enactment of economy - wide greenhouse gas regulations might do to alter our changing climate.

As dramatic and natural changes in the environment and the arrival of people to the continent roughly coincide in time, a scientific debate on what caused the demise of this fauna continues.

Climate change is happening, and humans play a role, Pruitt said in his opening statement, but there is «continued debate and dialogue» about the human role, climate change impacts, and what to do about them.

«While the debate on assisted migration continues,» they write, «it is clear that, across the planet, we have already given many species an unintentional head start on climate change.»

Archaeologists continue to debate the reasons for the collapse of many Central American cities and states, from Teotihuacan in Mexico to the Yucatan Maya, and climate change is considered one of the major causes.

Debate and controversy continue over the CCSS and associated changes to assessments.

The resulting debate has led to many significant changes in the original plan, and I am hoping that continued dialogue between the government and the Thai people will ultimately result in a more feasible plan and deeper sense of ownership of the reform process by those who are affected.

«It was an opportunity to broaden the debate, but we continue to only see urban schools,» West said, noting that there are reform issues in all schools and that there is a need for change.

Optimism for change may be unwise because crucial policy debates continue.

From worries about where the United States ranks on international tests to arguments over the Common Core, the way teachers teach and students learn math continues to be debated widely, leading to proposed changes in the ways mathematics is taught.

The... Continue reading Changing the Game: 26 NEW Rules for the Ed Reform Debate

Lawmakers continue to debate a bill that would change the state's school - accountability system.

Even if in the United States, the discussion about climate change continues to be framed as a debate, Goodell isn't arguing its...

Publishers are right when they say there's a role for them in an ebook world... Although authors will continue to self - publish, the debate that matters in the future is what the basket of services will be that authors require and what will be the right price for them... good covers, changing covers, dynamic pricing, constantly improved metadata, monitoring to catch glitch take - downs, as well as developmental editing, line - editing, copy - editing, and proofreading... The lines are drawn for that discussion and the opinions are really all over the lot.

Thanks to their persistent grassroots efforts — abetted by a confluence of factors, including changing priorities in the National Park Service, the decommissioning of military sites across the U.S., and a continuing debate over the future of Alcatraz Island — the Golden Gate National Recreation Area was established on October 27, 1972.

Maybe someone would like to reply to them but I guess scientifically the debate ended some time ago but getting political and economic action on climate change still requires a response from those who continue to befuddle the public.

Anyone who thinks that there is any genuine «debate» about either the reality of anthropogenic global warming and consequent climate change, or the grave threat not only to human civilization but to all life on earth if unmitigated, «business as usual» anthropogenic global warming and consequent climate change are permitted to continue, is profoundly misinformed.

There have been a host of notable reader reactions to the continuing oil gusher in the Gulf of Mexico seabed, the solutions being debated and the potential for us to change our behavior in response.

While much of the developed world continues to debate the most effective ways of tackling global carbon emissions in closed - door summits and international forums, some countries hardest hit from changing climate patterns are beginning to take a more direct approach.

One can tell by how climate change policies are being debated around much of the world that few people, including many very educated people, understand the scale and urgency of the problem now [continue reading...]

They are also difficult because the multilateral climate body — the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change — includes over 190 countries; these countries are grouped into various blocs with criss - crossing agendas and priorities; long - standing north - south resentments continue to rile the debate; and negotiations are governed by a consensus rule of procedure (bloody consensus!

Despite virtual unanimity among scientists that climate change is real, and that it is caused by human activities, people who cast doubt on climate science continue to dominate the debate.

Anyone who follows the climate change debate for a while must soon notice that when the denialistas have one of their argument proven wrong, or one factual misrepresentation corrected, they just continue as if nothing had happened.

While scientists continue to explore the consequences of climate change, there is essentially no debate among scientists about global warming's «connection to the actions of mankind.»

The 2008 election may determine whether Lindzen will continue to have a meaningful role in the public debate over climate change.

while in the context of the ongoing climate debate we continue — albeit with some embarrassment — to employ the scientifically meaningless phrase «climate change», we recognise that, in principle, a planetary warming to fend off otherwise imminent glacial inception, together with CO2 greening (the latter offsetting loss of vegetation footprint, the only real environmental concern) is having broad positive impacts on society, including the global economy, natural resources, and human health.

12, 1987) The Ocean in Human Affairs (Paragon House, 1989) The Universe and Its Origin: From Ancient Myths to Present Reality and Future Fantasy (Paragon House, 1990) Global Climate Change: Human and Natural Influences (Paragon House, 1989) The Greenhouse Debate Continued (ICS Press, 1992) The Scientific Case Against the Global Climate Treaty (SEPP, 1997) Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming's Unfinished Debate, (The Independent Institute, 1997)

Although Lawson and his Global Warming Policy Foundation have been discredited and attacked by numerous scientists and senior politicians, his thinktank continues to receive significant coverage, wrongfully distorting the public and policy debate over climate change.

«The science of climate change continues to evolve and regardless of the outcome of the climate debate, observational data suggests that we may be served well by basing our climate agenda, scientifically and economically, on a broader perspective than that in the IPCC outline...

... which prompt the reader to reflect on his intransigence, and the continued framing of the debate by the climate change establishment...

Continue reading «I Can Engage In A Flawed Debate About Climate Change»

«This really changes the trajectory of the debate» over when and how much carbon will be [continue reading...]

And while uncertainty exists and debate continues regarding the science and futureextent of projected climate changes, the trends are clear.

At the same time, climate scientists and science communicators will continue to debate the most effective ways to communicate the realities of climate change.

While the present policy debate on climate change focuses on 2020, 2050 and 2100 targets, our present use of fossil fuels will continue to affect the atmosphere and the oceans for many, many thousands of years.

What followed was a continued use of «the Revelle paper» in Congressional and Vice-Presidential debates with climate change skeptics including Singer, Balling and Michaels where it was used «to harrass, embarrass and otherwise discredit Al Gore.»