Sentences with phrase «change of government most»

Change of government Most worryingly for Brown, 58 per cent of voters believe it is time for a change in government, whilst only 36 per cent believe the economy is too fragile at the moment to have a change now.

Not exact matches

Most Greeks say that the economic reforms that the government has put through — though praised outside of the country — haven't brought any changes to their daily lives.

In my NYT bestselling book, Killing Sacred Cows, I warn people of the 15 major problems of the 401 (k), including: you're not the owner but only the beneficiary of your 401 (k), the government can change the rules at any time, you can't get to the money until 59 1/2, and the fees are typically much higher than most investments out there because you've added complexity and layers of administration and legal fees.

They're «the dreamers, visionaries, megalomaniacs, and arrogant sons - of - bitches» whose businesses «change lives and do more to lift thousands out of poverty than most government programs or nongovernmental organizations.»

Though some Republicans, like Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, were quick to praise Tillerson's international business experience working with foreign governments, Tillerson's nomination was met with deep skepticism from both parties over his embodiment of the most contentious 2016 campaign issues: Trump's closeness with Russia, climate change skepticism, and potential business conflicts of interest.

The government wasn't responsible for most of these changes, of course, but votes on free - trade agreements are an easy target for blame.

As a result of their remarkable generosity, philanthropy in 2016 is poised to stand alongside government and business as one of the most powerful forces influencing social change.

That's why the controversial proposals to dramatically change the taxation of private business in Canada are proving three things: tax literacy is alive and well in Canada, most people understand and value the incredible entrepreneurial spirit that drives the economic engine in this country, and the government thought these tax changes wouldn't be a big deal.

He should step to one side and allow the creation of a government of change,» said Luigi Di Maio, the leader of the anti-establishment 5 - Star that won the most votes at the March 4 ballot.

«One of the most important anticipated changes is that the Government is likely to prohibit collective and individual workplace agreements from allowing for a separate unfair dismissal remedy,» Mr Drake - Brockman said.

So far most of the government apps seem modest in scope (think: Mapping crime reports or finding out when the next train will come), but O'Reilly suggested that this is only the beginning and that the approach can work for big problems like rising health care costs, poorly performing schools, and climate change.

Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: our ability to achieve our financial, strategic and operational plans or initiatives; our ability to predict and manage medical costs and price effectively and develop and maintain good relationships with physicians, hospitals and other health care providers; the impact of modifications to our operations and processes; our ability to identify potential strategic acquisitions or transactions and realize the expected benefits of such transactions, including with respect to the Merger; the substantial level of government regulation over our business and the potential effects of new laws or regulations or changes in existing laws or regulations; the outcome of litigation, regulatory audits, investigations, actions and / or guaranty fund assessments; uncertainties surrounding participation in government - sponsored programs such as Medicare; the effectiveness and security of our information technology and other business systems; unfavorable industry, economic or political conditions, including foreign currency movements; acts of war, terrorism, natural disasters or pandemics; our ability to obtain shareholder or regulatory approvals required for the Merger or the requirement to accept conditions that could reduce the anticipated benefits of the Merger as a condition to obtaining regulatory approvals; a longer time than anticipated to consummate the proposed Merger; problems regarding the successful integration of the businesses of Express Scripts and Cigna; unexpected costs regarding the proposed Merger; diversion of management's attention from ongoing business operations and opportunities during the pendency of the Merger; potential litigation associated with the proposed Merger; the ability to retain key personnel; the availability of financing, including relating to the proposed Merger; effects on the businesses as a result of uncertainty surrounding the proposed Merger; as well as more specific risks and uncertainties discussed in our most recent report on Form 10 - K and subsequent reports on Forms 10 - Q and 8 - K available on the Investor Relations section of www.cigna.com as well as on Express Scripts» most recent report on Form 10 - K and subsequent reports on Forms 10 - Q and 8 - K available on the Investor Relations section of www.express-scripts.com.

The change, the government says, will create a threshold of $ 50,000 on passive income per year to ensure only three per cent of the most wealthy private corporations will have to pay higher taxes.

One of the most high - profile resolutions — co-sponsored by nine chambers or boards of trade from across the country — called on the federal government to refrain from changing the current governance model of Canada's ports and major airports, given that they are economic drivers for our national economy and crucial pieces of transportation infrastructure.

It is more than a little bewildering how a trade deal negotiated by the Stephen Harper regime — widely recognized as one of the most reactionary governments in Canadian history — can by some magical process become a truly progressive agreement because the government — not the agreement — changed.

The NDP have put forward the most comprehensive plan to fight Climate Change that Alberta has ever seen, something that the Progressive Conservatives were unable to do in the final decade of their 44 years in government and the Wildrose Party has been unable to do in its four years as official opposition.

As with most changes it takes a while for people to approve of a new norm and while it may make things difficult / uncomfortable for soldiers in the near term it will create a better, more ethical government organization in the long run.

The Nepalese government recently confirmed it would be changing the word, after it conducted a survey of its people and found most preferred the words «Hindu» or «religious freedom» to define the state instead.

Of course Christians will continue to respect even the most unjust governments as they develop nonviolent campaigns to witness to injustice and press for radical change.

After the president's alleged intervention, the platform was changed to include this sentence: «We need a government that stands up for the hopes, values and interests of working people and gives everyone willing to work hard the chance to make the most of their God - given potential.»

She welcomes the change that came in the «80s, when «aid was used to dismantle the unsustainable development model adopted by most African governments and to urge its replacement with a neoclassical economic vision of free markets, private investment - led growth and minimal government intervention in the economy.»

We should be extremely grateful that our founders were able to establish a system of government that has made possible both stability and orderly change throughout most of our history.

There was a reason why the founding fathers put kept religion out of our government and now it seems we are being asked to» pick the Christian» in this next years election — we are not picking the leader of a church here people, we picking someone to be the most influential, most powerful person on the earth... do we want someone who has our best interests at heart or someone who will time and again try to change the US laws to reflect his own personal beliefs?

Most Rev Justin Welby wrote to delegates - representing most of the world's governments - who are attending the 23rd annual United Nations Climate Change Conference in BMost Rev Justin Welby wrote to delegates - representing most of the world's governments - who are attending the 23rd annual United Nations Climate Change Conference in Bmost of the world's governments - who are attending the 23rd annual United Nations Climate Change Conference in Bonn.

Joint birth registration on its way: a victory for children, dads and the FI The Government has agreed to trial changes in the way births are registered, so as to capture details of both parents in all but the most exceptional cases.

Comfort concludes that most British governments of the last 60 years have been held prisoner by events, and the frequent changes of government failed to instil any long - term stability in industrial policy.

The most effective is when the ruling party accepts that it has lost an election and there is a change of government.

The GoR has achieved the agreement of its most important regional ally that Rwanda is safe for refugees to return to, which through the Government's impressive public relations system can be used to both delegitimize those Rwandans continuing to apply for asylum abroad, and buttress the State's claims to the changed nature of domestic politics.

The most recent official Government statistics, announced by the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) in June 2011, put the total number of households living in fuel poverty in the UK at 5.5 million in 2009 a rise of around 1 million when compared to 2008 and representing approximately 21 % of all UK households.

The Minister David Willets MP added: «Making the most of large and complex data is a huge priority for government as it has the potential to transform public and private sector organisations, drive research and development, increase productivity and innovation, and enable market - changing products and services.

Apparently labour introduced an increase of pension age to 65 in 1995 but failed to inform the women of the 50's who would be most directly affected, the government failed its legal duty to inform all women personally of this change, they tried to get away with this by stating they didn't have any current details, except they forget that they have all details from PAYE, us women still received all our NI demands and self - assessments as well as any tax or child benefit details, so they do have out details, they just failed to carry out this legal action.

The most important thing is that analysing past elections & predicting future elections is ridiculous, since electoral reform will hopefully change the political parties and the political process anyway, to make them more responsive to the genuine majority view, instead of the tribal attitude we see when Paul suggests that we should keep FPTP as the best way of electing a Labour government.

«The Government appears reluctant to learn from previous experience and put an end to this relentless programme of change, most of which is neither welcome nor useful.

Instead, it is the Tories most voters are prepared to credit for the changes in the economy and the education system (regardless of whether they feel it is good or bad)-- 64 % of voters (and 63 % of Tory supporters) credit the Tories in government with responsibility for changes in education, and 73 % of voters (and 90 % of Tory voters) credit them for changes in the economy.

Giambra admits too many obstacles got in the way: the battle against throat cancer that almost claimed his life, the wars with the area's political and business establishment and — most significantly — the failure of his calculated risk to force changes in Albany's relationship with local government.

If we try to summary the whole answer, then we may say that the norms are not there, but two important aspects have to be considered: Threat to peace and security and massive human rights violations; meanwhile, if there are not such cases, and the change has gone through the due process of law and the new government has been able to gain the most support of the member states, then the new government is recognized.

It is understandable why governments might wish to limit the potential of a medium that provides almost limitless potential to affect change, but to attack the freedoms of citizens already at the mercy of one of the most comprehensive surveillance apparatus in the world suggests a deeply flawed moral code.

In the most recent election, as the original post notes, neither of the major parties changed their share of seats in local government offices by more than 0.3 %, which rounds down to 0 %, so it is fair to say that there was «no clear winner» judged relative to the status quo.

In this post Meg Russell argues that whilst last Monday's vote was certainly unusual, the most significant change is the wider political context: that it is a Conservative government on the receiving end of repeated defeats in the Lords.

«That this House commends the Speaker on the action he has taken over the past year to reassert the principle that Ministers ought to make statements to the House before they are made elsewhere; notes that paragraph 9.1 of the Ministerial Code says that when Parliament is in session, the most important announcements of Government policy should be made in the first instance in Parliament; believes that compliance with this principle is essential for backbenchers to be able to represent the interests of their constituents and hold the Government to account; and invites the Procedure Committee to consider how the rules of the House could be better used or, if necessary, changed to ensure compliance with this principle and to develop a protocol for the release of information.»

The Government's proposed changes under the Welfare Reform Act represent one of the most significant changes undertaken by the Coalition Government.

FSB members have already identified cutting payroll taxes as the most important change the Government could make to encourage them to take on another member of staff.

With our resolution, New York City's oldest and most progressive political club calls for immediate government action to address the issue of climate change.

So why has this party — without a single seat in parliament — managed to change government and opposition policy on what many voters think to be the most important issue of the day?

Most of the changes introduced by the 1945 — 51 Labour government were accepted by the Conservatives and became part of the «post-war consensus» that lasted until the late 1970s.

And yet all of us sat to hear Sir Mark Walport, the Government's Chief Scientific Advisor, when he came last month and explained to the Government that the recent IPCC report - which made clear the threats posed by man - made climate change - was the most exhaustive, authoritative, peer reviewed report on climate change ever published.

Harris argues that the Conservative Party has survived for more than 150 years — and for most of that period in government — because it had managed change, appealed to public sentiment, ditched unpopular policies and leaders, split its opponents, and had a touch of magic.

The changes to be made will be a revision of the code of practice, revising which public bodies can use Ripa and making sure that authorisation comes from the most upper echelons of government.

'' -LSB-...][O] ne of the most common concerns regarding internet voting is the potential that one's vote could be changed either by a virus on your computer or as your ballot transits the internet on its way to the central government servers.

I think most people would like to see a change of government but do you really think its healthy for democracy for one part to hold such a large majority?