Sentences with phrase «change the theory instead»

His idea: Change the theory instead.

Not exact matches

Instead, what I said was that there is no credible theory that can reconcile natural selection taking purely random genetic mutations with stasis and rapid change.

Maybe i should have just used the word wob instead of the BSM seeing as it is they whom have used the change in Wenger theory (money helps ya know?)

Instead, the dominant theory for Neanderthal success at Skhul - Qafzeh is that 21st - century bête noire: climate change.

Now a bunch of physicists are advocating a gentler approach: let gravity be gravity, and look instead at how quantum theory might change its ways to accommodate it.

In theory, if a city or region has policies that encourage biking instead of driving, the researchers should be able to see the change in consumption patterns, with less car fuel consumed and fewer vehicles overall and a drop in consumption - based transport emissions, she said.

In a time when there are still institutions that won't teach Darwin's theories of natural selection (alongside it's perfect partner, random genetic mutation) instead favouring ideas of creationism, we're taking the time to honour the unique animals of the Galápagos Islands that helped inspire the game - changing, «On the Origin of Species».

good maybe capcom will make a devil may cry 5 now and get the sales that they wanted they would have got big sales if they made DMC 5 instead of DmC but ill give it to them for trying something new with the series but they changed too much from past games like loss of manual lockon changed the look of dante that was already liked by fans the guns sounded like pop guns rebellion was too small and so on also the slower frame rate did nt help but maybe capcom will listen and make devil may cry 5 now and aslong as its better than the crappy ninja theory reboot all will be forgiven

You immediately forget any theory laden narratives you may have about the work, and instead experience the motion and change for what it is, a grand environment that undercuts words and explanations.

Hence the entire North - Atlantic - Driven - Global - Climate - Change theory might be in need of revision; conditions in the North Atlantic may instead be responding actively to changes in the tropics, not the other way around.

Instead they offer a theory that climate change probably derives predominantly from natural ocean - atmosphere oscillations and / or by natural solar variations (irradiation and cosmic ray flux) and / or by natural cloud cover variations and / or the Milankovitch Effect, i.e. it is probably predominantly just natural.

Treating climate change as an absolute, unassailable fact, instead of what it is — an unproven, controversial scientific theory — a group of state attorneys general have announced that they will be targeting any companies that challenge the catastrophic climate change religion.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

Control theory is why enzymologists don't construct complex computer models based on changing an single input into an integrated metabolic pathway, but do experiments instead.

In this article, I present a neoclassical realist theory of climate change politics that challenges the idea that cooperation on climate change is compelled alone by shared norms and interests emanating from the international level and questions if instead [continue reading...]

There is NO evidence of «human induced greenhouse global warming» and there is NO evidence at all that NATURAL climate change is even being interfered with There is NOT even viable a «greenhouse effect» as the «theory» attempts to outline, instead the «greenhouse illusion» is only disguising the path to Uranium fueled generation.