Sentences with phrase «changing rules like»

Changing rules like that is not the same thing as reducing someone's pension.

Not exact matches

The change included: Relaxing previous rules that prevented users from seeing multiple posts from the same source in the news feed, promoting content from friends higher up in the news feed, and pushing «stories» about when a friend has liked or commented on a post further down the feed.

Last year, Airlines for America, a trade group representing United and other large U.S. airlines, included the reporting requirements of animal deaths or injuries among those federal rules it would like to see repealed or changed.

If you don't like the way the game is played, change the rules,» says Smith.

The agency must decide if the BATS stock exchange can change its rules to offer a bitcoin ETF (exchange traded fund), which would let people buy bitcoin like a common stock.

So what the Russians try to do is to change the subject, change the rules of international competition away from those more objective things to more subjective things like feelings, like fear, like anxiety.

Federal regulations like Sarbanes - Oxley and recent rule changes that make e-mail subject to discovery in the course of a federal lawsuit are also driving companies to archive e-mail, Flynn says.

Like most Realtors, Braun insists that his profession has offered consumers a choice of services and fee options all along and that the new rules won't change much.

Participating companies changed their websites to show what it would look like if those rules were eliminated.

The new rule will not change any aspect of applying for things like a loan or a business credit card, excepting the additional paperwork that may be necessary.

While GAAP rules changed to require companies to include stock - based compensation expense in 2005, many companies like CALD continue to exclude stock - based compensation in non-GAAP results.

Changes in tax rules, much like the stock market, can be unpredictable.

Tax rules have changed for 2018, of course — but what will they be like when you're ready to retire?

Resistance to changing these rules from people who mostly like the anonymity and un-traceability of Bitcoin means that Bitcoin can not become a widely used currency.

Extending the applicability date will give the Trump administration DOL more time to change the rule to its liking.

Furthermore, the Fed would like to adhere to the so - called «Taylor Rule» (in spite of Professor Taylor's protestations that it is misinterpreting and misusing his concept), a mathematical construct that purports to make monetary policy more «scientific» by establishing an arithmetic rule for varying the administered interest rate according to the variance of «actual from target inflation» (note that «inflation» refers to the change in a price index in this case, not the phenomenon of inflation of the money supply as such), as well as the variance of economic output from «potential output» (i.e, the so - called «output gap» is incorporated in the formula as weRule» (in spite of Professor Taylor's protestations that it is misinterpreting and misusing his concept), a mathematical construct that purports to make monetary policy more «scientific» by establishing an arithmetic rule for varying the administered interest rate according to the variance of «actual from target inflation» (note that «inflation» refers to the change in a price index in this case, not the phenomenon of inflation of the money supply as such), as well as the variance of economic output from «potential output» (i.e, the so - called «output gap» is incorporated in the formula as werule for varying the administered interest rate according to the variance of «actual from target inflation» (note that «inflation» refers to the change in a price index in this case, not the phenomenon of inflation of the money supply as such), as well as the variance of economic output from «potential output» (i.e, the so - called «output gap» is incorporated in the formula as well).

Even rules, like changing and how we can manage timing of issues around the draft.»

The Pope is basically just like an Umpire in a Baseball game — he keeps the game going and indicates what's in play or not, by the written rule book — but does not change the rules of the game — that's set.

The document criticizes «doctrinal or disciplinary security,» «an obsession with the law,» «punctilious concern for... doctrine,» «dogmatism,» «hiding behind rules and regulations,» and «a rigid resistance to change,» while reprimanding those who «give excessive importance to certain rules,» overemphasize «ecclesial rules,» believe that «doctrine... is a closed system,» «feel superior to others because they observe certain rules,» have «an answer for every question,» wish to «exercise a strict supervision over others» lives,» «long for a monolithic body of doctrine guarded by all and leaving no room for nuance,» believe that «we give glory to God... simply by following certain ethical norms,» and «look down on others like heartless judges, lording it over them and always trying to teach them lessons.»

It just sounds like these folks are looking for the «rules» to be changes to suit their lifestyles.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

If someone asks my religions (which is rare) I would either say that I'm not religious or respond with a bit more, like «I'm not religious, but I'm mostly a neutral monist rule utilitarian if that helps»... usually it doesn't and the topic changes.

If you don't like the rules, by all means, try to get them changed.

In which case the rule book should be changed, like the IFR.

If the employess don't like the rules they can seek other employment if enough do the curch may change its stance anyway.

ive been wrestling since i was 9 years old and when i went into high school i had to wrestle a girl... growing up learning to wrestle i had ended up having violent style, i never was dirty or broke rules but i was taught to do anything in your power to win whehter it was to club down the head or grab the throat to gain position etc. unfortunately i was in the postion to wrestle a girl once and at the time i did nt care who you were boy / girl, white / black / purple it did nt matter im was going to go out there bounce your head of the mat and bury you, so i went out there and wreslted the same way i always wrestled, 110 % and always to put your oppenents back through the mat i dditn change my style at all bc she was a girl i wrestled the same against everyone but after i pinned her in the first minute i did nt even realize that i broke her ribs when i power doubled through her, now after that for the rest of the tournament i was heckled and berated for forcefully beating a girl ppl were telling my parents «hey, looks like you raised a wife beater» etc. etc.... ever since then i refused to wrestle girls and thank go i eventually grew out of the lower weights, moral of the story is that is great and all that girls are wrestling but they shouldnt wrestle boys even if they know what they are getting into because 1.

Nope... you simply say He changed the rules you don't like but that He still enforces the rules you do like.

Because if you don't like the rules, then change them.

«The US dairy industry sees real value in the TPP negotiations if we are able to open new markets, like Japan and Canada, use the TPP process to strengthen global trading rules and secure meaningful competition policy changes in New Zealand's dairy sector,» said Suber.

Like raising kids, just when you think you have it figured out, they go and change the «rules» on you.

The only thing that changed with the Utley Rule is that umpires can now go back, look at the video and determine that a player like Bautista is unambiguously trying to disrupt the play.

But for BMW, winning the title in 2008 wasn't part of their plan, and even though it looked like Robert Kubica could have given Felipe Massa and Lewis Hamilton a run for their money across the season the team pretty much sacked off the rest of the year to focus on the new car and the rule changes for 2009.

Instead we'll be angry at something else F1 does, like making a bizarre mid-season rule change or a dodgy stewards decision.

Whilst the likes of Mercedes and Ferrari can afford to fight rule changes because they have the funds to do so, Williams» position is the one that's probably more representative of where the grid stands.

The reason it happened is that Wenger doesn't like figureheads in the changing room and wants everyone to be gentlemen and play by a elevated idea of conduct of the game that no longer rules (more Queensbury rules today).

I hate watching Arsenal get bitch slapped by a mid table team and all the hyperbolic doom and gloom rhetoric from the plastic Gunner fans out there but sadly losses like these will not be the exception to the Wenger rule this year and if monunental changes to the team set up as well as heavy investment arent made in the next few weeks IMHO Arsenal will be out of Europe for the first time in nearly 20 years.

Come on, admit it - as F1 fans we all like to have a moan about how things were better in the past, or how rule changes totally screwed with the dynamics of the sport.

So assuming that this will be his last season in charge of the Gunners, will Wenger change his transfer policy, which is often ruled by a long term outlook rather than the sort of quick fix that the likes of Jose Mourinho usually goes for?

Not everyone likes that change («Chucky never had any balls when it came to women,» as a teammate tells me, way - y - y - y off the record), but on the Mobb the rule is unbending: What's good for one is good for all.

In the old days (like last year lol) if Arsenal (or any team in the Top Four) won the FA Cup, then the runners - up in the Cup Final would take their place in the Europa League, like Hull did last year, but now UEFA have changed the rules so that if Arsenal win the Cup again, then that last Europa place will go to the next highest - placed team in the League table.

With rule changes going into effect for the first time this offseason — like the amount of time a player has to make his decision or the ways picks are lost and gained, things will be a little different than previous years.

Wenger is unhappy with the difference between the UK rules and those of other European countries like Spain or Portugal, and wants the rules changed accordingly.

With respect to that, we were at the top and it seemed like there were a lot of rules changes us to slow us down and now you have cars that are so much faster than the field and the complete inaction by [NASCAR].»

So, MLB is considering making some «formal» changes to the strike zone this offseason, in order to make individual umps have strike zones that look more like what MLB has in the rule book.

There might be a few weeks early on where some fans are upset or confused, but like with every other major rule change in the game over the years, it'll become the norm in no time, and the Players Union isn't going to get this leverage they're expecting to appear.

Liberty's decision to make these rule changes may seem minor in the wake of the enormous, sport - ruining alterations it made in the off - season, like changing the F1 logo and getting rid of grid girls, but they're likely to have a profound effect on the racing going forward.

If Ireland had drawn France under the old system, then I would have no complaints, but the fact that the rules were changed to benefit «bigger» teams like France is what really grates on me.

If you do you need sectioning, why hasn't the FA brought Wenger to rule like they did Mick McCarthy for making do many changes?

Thanks to dumb and arbitrary rules that are only now being changed because they are dumb and arbitrary, Aubameyang is unfortunately cup tied to Dortmund who, like CSKA Moscow, were bounced from the group stage of the Champion's League and were given a berth in the Europa League knockout stages as a consolation prize.

if people would act assertively and be responsible for themselves we don't need millions of rules and official interventions (sorry my comment got cut off before)... I for one like to use my own personal power to make changes I need for myself rather than to rely on some outside source