The most recent national
charter school study finds a small positive effect in reading and a small negative effect in mathematics.
Not exact matches
Despite dramatic growth in enrollment in online
charter schools in Ohio, students are not achieving the same academic success as those in brick - and - mortar
charter and public
schools,
finds a
study by NYU's Steinhardt
School of Culture, Education, and Human Development and RAND Corporation.
CREDO had done a national
study that
found more
charters doing badly compared to their feeder
schools from the traditional public sector, and an NBER
study in New York City
found substantially better performance of
charters versus traditional public
schools.
[5] This central
finding, together with our
study, only reinforces our ultimate conclusion: it is critical to consider what kinds of choices we are offering families in urban, suburban and rural areas across the country, and in
charter or traditional public
schools alike.
[2] We also cited a
study from Arizona that
found that
charter schools within one traditional public
school district pulled students from 21 distinct districts.
Rather, we
found that the particular
charter schools in the Boston area (especially those that were part of the lottery
study) seem to be having large impacts on student achievement.
Despite the united front of opposition, with
studies like Carol Klein's 2006 Virtual
Charter Schools and Home Schooling finding high levels of parent satisfaction and student achievement at virtual schools, it is highly unlikely that independent home schoolers and advocates for traditional public schools will be able to sto
Schools and Home
Schooling finding high levels of parent satisfaction and student achievement at virtual
schools, it is highly unlikely that independent home schoolers and advocates for traditional public schools will be able to sto
schools, it is highly unlikely that independent home
schoolers and advocates for traditional public
schools will be able to sto
schools will be able to stop them.
The
study, «Leveraging Local Innovation: The Case of Michigan's
Charter Schools,» found that the schools have mostly seized on innovative practices already in use for years in regular public schools, rather than coming up with new ideas of the
Schools,»
found that the
schools have mostly seized on innovative practices already in use for years in regular public schools, rather than coming up with new ideas of the
schools have mostly seized on innovative practices already in use for years in regular public
schools, rather than coming up with new ideas of the
schools, rather than coming up with new ideas of their own.
An Ernst & Young
study of 430 loan transactions by 15 community - development financial institutions (CDFIs) involving 336
charter schools found a foreclosure rate of 1 percent, lower than the corporate sector debt - default rate of about 3 percent.
The Mathematica
study of
charter middle
schools, just released by the U. S. Department of Education,
finds no achievement gains within two years for students who won the
charter lottery as compared to those who did not.
Our
study finds that
charter schools are encountering a set of interlocking barriers to growth that essentially reflect the price of success.
However, a RAND
study found that, in most states, students tend to transfer between traditional public and
charter schools with similar racial compositions.
Mathematica's own defense of its research design was that it could do the
study more cheaply if it relied upon readily available data, even though Caroline Hoxby, facing similar data collection problems, nonetheless
found a way of tracking students from first grade on («How New York City's
Charter Schools Affect Achievement»).
The
findings presented here differ from those of two previous
studies that examine the same hypothesis for North Carolina
charter schools.
The editorial cites a new
study by the California
Charter Schools Association which
studied the state's Academic Performance Index (API), which runs on a scale from 200 to 1000, and
found that, according to the Journal,
In fact, the AFT
study finds «general funding comparability,» even though
charter schools receive less funding for facilities.
A new Brookings
study by Russ Whitehurst and Michelle Croft
finds that students attending the
charter school connected with the Harlem Children's Zone do not outperform students at other New York City
charter schools, but Jay Mathews warns that it is too soon to draw conclusions about the impact of the HCZ's services.
A 2015
study by Stanford University's Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO)
found Newark
charter schools outperformed traditional district
schools: 77 percent of Newark's
charters were more effective at raising test scores in reading, and 69 percent were more effective at raising scores in math.
Another
study, by Michigan's Mackinac Center for Public Policy,
found positive, but by their admission «not great,» results: Detroit
charter high
schools performed somewhat better than predicted based on their socioeconomic makeup, while Detroit Public Schools performed worse than pre
schools performed somewhat better than predicted based on their socioeconomic makeup, while Detroit Public
Schools performed worse than pre
Schools performed worse than predicted.
A Fordham Institute
study found that on average
charters receive $ 1,800 less per student than traditional public
schools, despite serving more disadvantaged students.
The
study — part of a larger report put out by the National
Charter School Research Project at the Seattle - based Center on Reinventing Public Education — found, for instance, that charter school parents are
Charter School Research Project at the Seattle - based Center on Reinventing Public Education — found, for instance, that charter school parents are j
School Research Project at the Seattle - based Center on Reinventing Public Education —
found, for instance, that
charter school parents are
charter school parents are j
school parents are just...
This summer, a high - performing KIPP
charter school in Annapolis, Maryland, was forced to close because it couldn't
find a permanent facility, even though the
school district, according to its own
study, had 900 empty seats in a nearby, underutilized
school.
This approach, which is used by Caroline Hoxby and Jonah Rockoff in their
study of
charter schools in Chicago (see «
Findings from the City of Big Shoulders»), is useful for determining if a particular
charter school or the education program it offered is effective.
A
study of test scores from 2010 through 2014, by economists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Duke University,
found that Denver's
charters produced «remarkably large gains in math,» large gains in writing, and smaller but statistically significant gains in reading, compared to DPS - operated
schools.
For instance, a Brookings Institution
study of the Harlem Children's Zone — one of the few reforms that Ravitch likes —
found its students performing on par with peers from
charter schools that did not provide wrap - around services.
The
study's
findings support these
school conversions and «are also relevant to the expanding
charter school sector, which has the opportunity to choose grade configurations» when
schools are established.
Importantly, the association's charges are supported by a 2013
school - finance
study commissioned by D.C. mayor Vincent Gray, which
found that «differences in the level of resources allocated to District of Columbia Public
Schools (DCPS) and public charter schools have been particularly concerning.
Schools (DCPS) and public
charter schools have been particularly concerning.
schools have been particularly concerning.»
CREDO
found that non-profit
schools made much larger test gains than for - profit ones, prompting AFT president Randi Weingarten to thunder «this CREDO
study confirms that for - profit
charter and virtual
schools serve the interests of corporations» rather than kids.
A
study released earlier this month by Mathematica
finds that students attending
charter high
schools in Florida scored lower on achievement tests than students in traditional public
schools, but years later, the
charter students were more likely to have attended at least two years of college and also had higher earnings.
Put aside that it's likely that both the authors of the
study and the
schools themselves have points in their favor — the full - time virtual
charter schools themselves have in the past been transparent about some of their academic struggles, and, at the same time, in their criticism of the
study, those same
schools are surely right that the characteristics and motivation of some of their students for attending full - time virtual
charters makes them quite unlike the «virtual twins» the
study purports to have
found for the purposes of comparison.
Even when researchers can evaluate
charter schools that are large enough to contribute useful results to a
study, old enough to have a track record, and representative of a substantial share of all
charter schools, they face a daunting analytical challenge:
finding students in the regular public
schools who are truly comparable to the
charter school students.
Scott Milliman and I
found, after correcting for this and other errors, that one of the key
studies cited by the AFT as alleging racial concentration in
charter schools in fact
found charter schools no more segregated than district
schools, with the notable exception of those
charters that had converted from private
schools.
That
study, and a follow - up report published two years later,
found that in Detroit, about half to three - fifths of
charter schools outperformed demographically similar district
schools on reading and math assessments.
(See Table 7 on p. 44) To claim that half the
charters perform the same or worse than traditional public
schools is a grotesque distortion of the
study's
findings.
In a separate 2009
study, Winters also
found that «the more students a public
school lost to
charters, the better its remaining students performed — probably because the
school now faced competition from
charters for enrollment.»
As evidence, Harris cites what he calls a «well - regarded
study,» which «
found that Detroit's
charter schools performed at about the same dismal level as its traditional public
schools.»
Similarly, the Stanford University Center for Research on Education Outcomes [4]
found in a 2013
study that after only a year, New York City
charter school students gained substantially more in reading and math than their traditional
school peers.
The
study found that only 1 % of Detroit's
charters performs significantly worse than the traditional public
schools in reading and only 7 % in math.
The first
study finds that
charter parents are considerably more satisfied with their
schools than are district -
school parents, though private -
school parents are the most satisfied of all.
The Institute of Education Sciences
study headed up by Patrick Wolf
found students more likely to graduate from voucher
schools in Washington, D. C. Kevin Booker, Tim R. Sass, Brian Gill and Ron Zimmer
found the same for
charter schools in Chicago and Florida.
Our
finding that
charter school sectors in all 28 states that we study demonstrate higher productivity and / or return on investment than their traditional public school sectors has ruffled some feathers at the National School Boards Associ
school sectors in all 28 states that we
study demonstrate higher productivity and / or return on investment than their traditional public
school sectors has ruffled some feathers at the National School Boards Associ
school sectors has ruffled some feathers at the National
School Boards Associ
School Boards Association.
We cite a 2012
study in the Economics of Education Review by David Stuit of Basis Policy Research and Thomas Smith of Vanderbilt, using data from 2004, which
found that teacher turnover in
charters was double that
found in traditional public
schools (24 % vs. 12 %) and seeks to explain why that is the case.
But a 2010 U.S. Department of Education
charter -
school study found that suburban
charters, presumably with progressive elements, performed less well than comparable district
schools.
It is true, as Smith points out, that a 2013 Stanford CREDO
study finds that low - income students in high - poverty
charter schools do somewhat better than low - income students in high - poverty district
schools.
Finally, the only
study to have estimated the effect of
charter school attendance on students» job prospects, although based on nonexperimental methods,
finds that attending a Florida
charter school increased students» earnings as adults despite having no impact on their standardized test scores.
Across all 28 states in our
study we
found that public
charter school sectors were more cost effective and / or generated a higher return on investment (ROI) than traditional public
schools.
Why do
charter schools, 88 percent of which are nonunion, only outperform regular public
schools 17 percent of the time, as a 2009 Stanford University
study found?
Two recent
studies, one by Joshua Angrist and colleagues and another by Matthew Johnson and colleagues,
found that attendance at urban
charter middle
schools with high behavioral expectations is associated with a higher number of days suspended relative to attendance at traditional
schools in the same districts.
Using rigorous non-experimental methods, a 2013
study of
charters in 16 states by the Center for Research on Education Outcomes
found that average
charter school effectiveness increased overall, due in large part to closures of poorly performing
schools.
In the Florida
study, the authors
found that enrolling in a
charter school increased earnings by 12 %.