Sentences with phrase «charter rights here»

The Bavaria 41 and Jeanneau 349 are exquisite yacht charters right here in Cyprus.

Not exact matches

But we are protected by our human rights charter up here, I know it's different in the states, sadly.

I covered it in detail in my answer on Skeptics here, the exact quote of # 19 for example is: «The partition of Palestine in 1947 and the establishment of Israel is null and void from the very beginning, whatever time has elapsed because it was done contrary to the wish of the people of Palestine and their national right to their homeland and contradicts with the principles embodied in the charter of the UN, the first of which is the right of self - determination

Here's hoping that Success skeptics will open themselves to the possibility that the network is actually getting some things right, and that Success supporters will consider how the rapidly expanding network can do everything possible to attract and retain the kids who most need its help and share best practices with other schools, charter and district.

At Central Education Center, a new charter school south of this city, some students will have their pick of $ 35,000 - a-year jobs right after graduation because of the opportunities they have here to take postsecondary - level technical courses while finishing high school.

«We are here today because every public school student deserves to be treated fairly, but right now that's not happening, said La'Quita Boles, a mother of two students who attend public charter schools in Bridgeport.

Connecticut's charter schools are a very real example that de facto discrimination is taking place right here in our state.

San Diego Charter Schools were well represented at the 2012 Conference - find out more... and don't forget to mark your calendars for next year's conference right here in San Diego.

Here is a brief list of questions that we encourage parents and guardians to ask when searching for the right charter school for their children:

I'm proud to see that many of those charter school leaders represent schools right here in Nashville.

What isn't mentioned here, but has been by the UCLA Civil Rights Project, is that the most widely used mechanism of «choice» in the state, that is charter schools, has increased economic and ethnic segregation in the schools (see its study).

«The real issue in my belief here is not so much who's right or who's wrong, but it shows very clearly — to me anyway — that even though there's been some substantial funding reform in the state, we still haven't necessarily cracked the nut on how to treat state - chartered schools or public charter schools in general,» Deigan said.

Tentatively named Empowerment Leadership Academy, this school will bring the best practices for personalized learning from top charter and private schools across the country into practice right here.

Click here» The NAACP, one of the nation's most prominent civil rights groups, released a major report on charter schools today.

PAA opposed the House charter expansion bill (see our position paper here) in part because of our concerns about the lack of equity, quality, parental rights, and accountability in many charter schools.

It happens right here in Connecticut, most notably in our charter schools.

We'd like to congratulate Zaire Downs, an 8th grader here at PUC Achieve Charter School, who was recently recognized with a «Do the Right Thing Award» by the Rochester Police Department!

Despite using public funds, Connecticut's charter schools prove that «de facto» discrimination is taking place right here in our state.

That said, I think it is orchestrated from the Gates side — they have the reputation of being an educational foundation making a big difference in the world — but on this issue they are right there with the Wal - Mart (Walton» s) pumping money into charter schools — so they release what appears to be an independent study — reporters think — hey here is something I can use to show an independent assessment — and the report doesn't say — by the we are the 2nd or 3rd biggest funder of charter schools.

In summary, the right result was probably reached here, but the reasons given are difficult to reconcile with Doré and the appropriate role of Charter values.

The question of survival of rights balanced by their loss will be considered here in the context of: (i) the right of a child to have his / her «views taken into consideration (Art 24 (1); and (ii) «the right [of a child] to maintain... a personal relationship and direct contact with both his or her parents»; and of the effect on children and their parents that the rights guaranteed by the Charter and of Brussels IIA no longer applying directly to the UK.

I must admit that I am a bit more in two minds here about his rather positive assessment (pp. 104 - 105) of the role of Article 51 (1) of the Charter, as in particular after the Åkerberg Fransson case we still have to see to what extent there will remain effectively two clearly separate spheres of Member State and EU fundamental rights protection.

I reproduce the speech here in its entirety, and it touches on a number of interesting issues, including the challenges of constitutional reform, changing societal values, patriation, the tensions in federalism, and the need for a constitutional Bill of Rights, a full 15 years before the Charter was enacted.

According to yesterday's news (see here for an article from the National Post), the government of New Brunswick will be asking the Supreme Court of Canada to look into the status of its language laws as it appeals the decision of its appellate court upholding the decision of a provincial judge who excluded breath - sample evidence of a suspected impaired driver pursuant to s. 24 (2) of the Canadian Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms because his language rights had been violated (see R. v. Losier, 2011 NBCA 102 (CanLII)Rights and Freedoms because his language rights had been violated (see R. v. Losier, 2011 NBCA 102 (CanLII)rights had been violated (see R. v. Losier, 2011 NBCA 102 (CanLII)-RRB-.

More information about rights under the Charter may be found here: http://www.aclrc.com/how-do-i-make-a-charter-claim/ and here: http://www.aclrc.com/starting-a-charter-claim/.

In the wake of the Quebec government tabling Bill 14, An Act to amend the Charter of the French language, the [Quebec] Charter of Rights and Freedoms and other legislative provisions to improve yet again the eminence of the French language in Quebec (which I discussed on Slaw last December here), the Conseil supérieur de la langue française (CSLF) is of the opinion that the government needs to take a hard - line approach if it wants French to really be the common language of all Quebecers.

Still, the Charter right at stake here exists, in part, to ensure detainees have reasonable access to legal advice in order to rectify the disadvantage they have in preserving the right to silence, and so that they can learn about their legal rights relating to their detention.

The Charter is different from human rights statutes, which protect individuals from discrimination by the government and private actors (for information on human rights regimes, click here).

This differs from the Charter, which protects various rights and freedoms from government action only (see discussion of your Charter rights and freedoms here).

By analyzing both the law and the right or freedom, the Court can determine if the government action has infringed a Charter right or freedom (a detailed discussion of the most commonly invoked Charter rights and freedoms are located here).

8, 9 and 10 Charter violations here were found to be in good faith given the modus operandi of TAVIS at the time, but there was a pattern of serious violations that reflected a disregard for the rights of the citizen that favoured exclusion.

One may already stop here to wonder whether the EFTA Court is not making its life too easy speaking of an interpretation of EEA law «in the light» of fundamental rights in the present case; a more thorough reasoning would have had to grapple with the scope of EEA law in the case: Only if Iceland was acting effectively within the scope of EEA law here the fundamental rights standards of EEA law apply under the EFTA Court's supervision; otherwise one could argue that the Supreme Court of Iceland's action ought to be judged against the benchmark of domestic fundamental rights and ECHR standards (compare the rich debate on the parallel problem in EU law which focuses on Article 51 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rirights in the present case; a more thorough reasoning would have had to grapple with the scope of EEA law in the case: Only if Iceland was acting effectively within the scope of EEA law here the fundamental rights standards of EEA law apply under the EFTA Court's supervision; otherwise one could argue that the Supreme Court of Iceland's action ought to be judged against the benchmark of domestic fundamental rights and ECHR standards (compare the rich debate on the parallel problem in EU law which focuses on Article 51 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rirights standards of EEA law apply under the EFTA Court's supervision; otherwise one could argue that the Supreme Court of Iceland's action ought to be judged against the benchmark of domestic fundamental rights and ECHR standards (compare the rich debate on the parallel problem in EU law which focuses on Article 51 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rirights and ECHR standards (compare the rich debate on the parallel problem in EU law which focuses on Article 51 of the EU Charter of Fundamental RightsRights).

I can not accept an approach that, for remedial purposes, implies that Charter rights can be here one day and gone the next or, conversely, that they depend on judicial recognition of «a new or newly recognized technological or social environment» (para. 99) for their genesis.

Here this was provided by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union («CFREU»): the Human Rights Act could provide no automatic remedy beyond a declaration that Ms Janah's rights have been breRights of the European Union («CFREU»): the Human Rights Act could provide no automatic remedy beyond a declaration that Ms Janah's rights have been breRights Act could provide no automatic remedy beyond a declaration that Ms Janah's rights have been brerights have been breached.

They are, just like the recent prisoners» rights cases Ms. Kerr extols, part of what Kerri Froc described as an «empirical turn in Charter jurisprudence,» on which I have been writing quite a bit here.

To whet your appetite, here is the abstract: In interpreting the «prescribed by law» requirement contained in section 1 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canadian courts have -LSB-...] Read more

Here's a search for «charter of rights and freedoms» in a timeline view.

[33] The continuation of that distinction here for an ill or disabled child of unmarried parents is difficult to justify in the modern era of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Here's what I wrote when I considered invoking section 33 in response to what I considered to be some of the worst decisions ever made by the Supreme Court under the Charter, those that elevated to constitutional status the rights to bargain collectively and to strike: