Does the fact that the humaneness of bonded
child labor, often tied to the caste system, is disputed within India
mean that «no unifying demands» should be placed on that country to halt the practice, or that India should not pass
laws on the subject (as it has) until its citizenry is of a common moral mind?
As I am sure you know as a member of the Senate Health, Education,
Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, what the least restrictive environment
means is that
children with special needs are required by
law to be placed in a general education classroom or a setting as close to the general education setting as much as possible consistent with that
child's right to receive a free and appropriate public education.