Sentences with phrase «christ after the resurrection»

The eyewitnesses of the Resurrection of Jesus — those who ate, drank, spoke with, and listened to the Lord Jesus Christ after His Resurrection — were so convinced of the Good News of God's Love, Forgiveness, Peace, and Healing Power for all humanity revealed by the Risen Jesus Christ that these eyewitnesses were willing to die as martyrs for their belief in the Risen Christ as fully God and fully man when it was illegal to do so under Roman authority (where Cesar was considered a deity in the state cult religion).

And if he is made God by water and the Holy Spirit after the regeneration of the laver he is found to be also joint - heir with Christ after the resurrection of the dead — Hippolytus, Discourse On The Holy Theiphany, (section) 8; ANF, Vol.

Not exact matches

After the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, salvation is through the belief in Jesus Christ as the Son of God.

And a great resurrection to physical live a second time after the 1000 year reign of Jesus Christ on Earth.

'» If by days, we understand years and by sanctuary, the church, than cleansed, Miller thought, «we may reasonably suppose means that complete redemption from sin, both soul and body, after the resurrection when Christ comes the second time «without sin unto salvation.

The Holy Baptism: After you have started to believe, get baptized and receive the releasing power of Christ's death and resurrection.

For almost 400 years after Jesus Christ's resurrection the people did not have the Bible... they were not lost but lived by conscience and Tradition of the Apostles.

Even after the resurrection, the way of the cross remains the way of following Christ.

After Christ resurrection He breath on his disciples / then instructs them to wait for the promise of the Holy Spirit.

The Acts of the Apostles, also simply referred to as the «book of Acts» or «Acts», is a narrative of the apostles» ministry after Christ's death and resurrection, from which point it resumes and functions as a sequel to the Gospel of Luke.

After Christ's Death, Resurrection, and Ascension, the Church, which has its origins in the Trinity itself (cf Dominum et Vivificantem), is sanctified through the sending of the Spirit in order that she can be «Christ's continuing presence in the world».

OK nice summary, except that glorification does not occur after death but after Resurrection (for those who have died) or after Translation (for those still alive when Christ returns).

The Catechism of the Catholic Church sees the power of the keys that Jesus promised to Peter alone in Matthew 16:19 as signifying authority to govern the house of God, that is, the Church, an authority that Jesus after his resurrection confirmed for Peter by instructing him in John 21:15 — 17 to feed Christ's sheep.

The LDS were considered heretical for their additional texts; their view on God the Father, Son, and Spirit; Christ's visit to the ancient Americans after his resurrection as translated by their prophet Joseph Smith; and so on.

Yet the whole context of the passage indicates that Paul is not speaking primarily about the resurrection after death but to new life in the present through knowing Christ as Savior.)

Lumen Gentium, the Constitution on the Church, reads: «This is the one Church of Christ which in the Creed is professed as one, holy, catholic, and apostolic, which our Savior, after his Resurrection, commissioned Peter to shepherd, and him and the other apostles to extend and direct with authority, which he erected for all ages as «the pillar and mainstay of the truth.»

The resurrection of Christ is a way of affirming that God has received into his own life all that the historical event, designated when we say «Jesus Christ», has included: — his human existence as teacher and prophet, as crucified man upon his cross, in continuing relationship of others with him after that death, and also what has happened as a consequence of his presence and activity in the world.

Whatever may have been the actual course of events, historically speaking, which the New Testament means to signify when it speaks of the resurrection of Jesus Christ, it is at least clear that it was the conviction of the New Testament writers, building on the testimony of the disciples after the crucifixion of Jesus — as it has been the continuing conviction of millions of Christian people since that time — that far from Jesus» being «put out of the way» by his death at the hands of the Roman authorities in Palestine, he was «let loose into the world.»

If the fashion in which the basic New Testament proclamation has been interpreted in the preceding chapter has validity, then talk of the resurrection of Christ is a way of affirming that God has received into his own life all that the historical event, designated when we say «Jesus Christ», has included: his human existence as teacher and prophet, as crucified man upon his cross, in continuing relationship of others with him after that death, and along with this what has happened in consequence of his presence and activity in the world.

What was true of Christ's work in the Church after His resurrection was already true of His words and works in the flesh.

After going into some of the theories of how the evidence about Jesus could have been «tampered» with along the way, he then shows how each theory does not have the evidence to support it, and in the following chapters, goes «link by link» through the chain of custody to show how the Gospel records we have today are an accurate reflection of what was originally written down, and are also an accurate account of what actually happened during the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

After all, who can understand the coming power of the resurrection better than someone who has lived as a dead man but is now alive in Christ?

In a study of his earlier pictures, Kolker notes that «Scorsese is interested in the psychological manifestations of individuals who are representative either of a class or of a certain ideological grouping; he is concerned with their relationship to each other or to an antagonistic environment... [and finally] there is no triumph for his characters» (A Cinema of Loneliness [Oxford University Press, 19881, p. 162) The Jesus of the Last Temptation fits this pattern (as do Travis Bickel in Taxi Driver, Jake LaMotta in Raging Bull and Paul Hackett in After Hours) By eschewing any reference to a resurrection — and, in an interesting theological note, allowing Paul to suggest that his preaching of the risen Christ is more important than the Jesus of history — Scorsese presents the crucifixion as the final willful act of a man driven by a God who makes strange demands on his followers.

The three stages of Christian existence are thus sketched out: first is the time of the manifestation of God's glory through Christ to the disciples; second is the new form of presence of Christ in the church after his death and resurrection (this is where John was, and where we are now); finally, there is the consummation of the church in the perfect love of the presence of God.

@jf well your information about the New Testament is about as accurate as your Old Testament knowledge, The prophecies of the Old testament concerning Christ could not have been written after the fact because we now have the Dead Sea Scrolls, with an almost complete Old Testament dated 100 - 200 years before the birth of Christ, Your interpretation of God at His worst shows a complete lack of understanding as to what was being communicated.We don't know what the original texts of the New Testament were written in as to date there are no original copies available.Greek was the common language of the day.Most of the gospels were reported written somewhere in the 30 year after Christs resurrection time frame, not the unspecified «long after «you reference and three of the authors knew Jesus personally in His earthly ministry, the other Knew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes»

Should you wonder if, in eternal life, you might be bound down to some fixed place, God will give to His friends «an agility so great that in an instant they can go wherever they wish... [and] they can enter and depart through closed doors, without any impediment, as Jesus Christ did after the resurrection.»

Thus one who denies a priori that there was objective ground for the resurrection faith of early Christianity denies in effect the whole Gospel portrait of Jesus, for the knowledge of the living Christ after the crucifixion is altogether continuous, of a piece, with the memory of the human Jesus.

Neither the saying on the Cross, «Today you will be with me in paradise» (Luke 23:43), the parable of the rich man, where Lazarus is carried directly to Abraham's bosom (Luke 16:22), nor Paul's saying, «I desire to die and to be with Christ» (Philippians 1:23), proves as is often maintained that the resurrection of the body takes place immediately after the individual death.

This humanity of Christ found one of its greatest defenders in St Ignatius of Antioch: «For my own part, I know and believe that he was in actual human flesh, even after his resurrection.

It is year 2012, 2012 years after the Death and Resurrection of Christ Jesus.

In Luke, after the Resurrection, Jesus tells the two disciples on the way to Emmaus that the Christ had to suffer (24:26), that is, the same thing is said there about the Messiah that is said here about the Son of man.

This resurrection began with Jesus Christ, Who is the Firstborn from among the dead, continues with the rapture and resurrection of all the dead in Christ, and then culminates with the resurrection of all the tribulation and Old Testament Saints after the Tribulation (1 Cor 15:23; 1 Thess 4:16; Rev 20:3 - 5; Dan 12:2; Isa 26:19).

After the resurrection of Christ, the disciples went to different parts of the world to proclaim the Gospel.

The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church states: 1 «Christ announced the necessity of a spiritual regeneration «of water and the spirit» in his conversation with Nicodemus, and it has been commonly held that he instituted the Sacrament either at an unspecified date before His passion or after his resurrection, when he gave the disciples the command to baptise in the Threefold Name.»

But based upon a plethora of New Testament passages, Christians have also recognized that there IS indeed also a technical usage of the term «the gospel» that came into effect after Christ's resurrection that refers not to good news in general, nor to the general revelation of God given through the Old and New testaments, but to the specific message that must be preached to the lost and must be believed by the lost to receive eternal life.

In those situations Christ's physical death and resurrections was re «embodied» night after night, before the very eyes of believers and nonbelievers alike.»

My intention is to informally and briefly address a more basic question — is the term «THE GOSPEL» ever used after Christ's resurrection as a technical term for the specific message that the lost must believe to get saved??

I think most people come to that point AFTER they hear about the death and resurrection of Christ.

But we will see when a message is referred to «the gospel» after Christ's resurrection, it usually refers to this specific message preached to the the lost, which they must believe in order to receive eternal life.

The risen Jesus Christ appeared to over 500 people after His resurrection.

The reason we are talking about after Christ's resurrection is because «the gospel» that we are talking about was never termed as such before, and for example, during Christ's earthly ministry, «the gospel of the kingdom» was preached to the Jews — even then «the gospel» had a technical usage then for a different specific message that applied to that particular time (Mt. 4:23, 9:35, cf. 10:7; Mk.

After the death and resurrection of Christ there is no longer need for the «Tent» or sanctuary because Christ's risen body has taken its place.

So Christ came to earth and was crucified, and man was set free, but the bargain turned out to be a «pious fraud» on God's part, for by his resurrection from Sheol Christ escaped from Satan after all.

Easter really isn't about eggs, after all... it's about the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, my savior.

In point of fact there is no reference to Christ eating meat, ever, except for after the resurrection where he ate a bite of broiled fish to convince the apostles he was risen from the dead and not an apparition.