The decline of
Christendom meant that public life was becoming increasingly secularized and Christianity was being privatized.
Not exact matches
There were many evil things done in the Name of Jesus Christ, but it is not really to be as surprise, becaue Jesus said that the evil one, which is the devil, will plant his seeds in the midst of God's church,
meaning here «The
Christendom».
According to The New Encyclopædia Britannica, the one called St.Augustine's «mind was the crucible in which the religion of the New Testament was most completely fused with the Platonic tradition of Greek philosophy; and it was also the
means by which the product of this fusion was transmitted to the
Christendoms of medieval Roman Catholicism and Renaissance Protestantism.»
What we know as the traditional image of the Incarnation is precisely the
means by which
Christendom laid the ground for an inevitable willing of the death of God, for this traditional image made possible the sanctification of «time» and «nature,» a sanctification finally leading to the transformation of eternity into time.
If theology is to transcend itself it must negate itself, for theology can be reborn only through the death of
Christendom, which finally
means the death of the Christian God, the God who is the transcendence of Being.
Simply by noting the overwhelming power and the comprehensive expression of the modern Christian experience of the death of God, we can sense the effect of the ever fuller movement of the Word or Spirit into history, a movement whose full
meaning only dawns with the collapse of
Christendom, and in the wake of the historical realization of the death of God.
Only such a dialectical negation can save the
meaning of faith from the darkness brought on by the collapse of
Christendom.
The confusion in modern
Christendom about the
meaning of the ministry makes itself evident in uncertainty about pastoral authority as well as in the vagueness present in thought about pastoral functions.
The Reformers spoke in biblicist terms when trying to rid
Christendom of what they identified as Catholic errors, but biblicism became a less functional standard once Protestants began to disagree among themselves about the
meaning of the Bible.
Edwin E. Aubrey, Present Theological Tendencies, (New York: Harper and Brothers), 1936), 187; C. C. Morrison, «Thomism and the Re-birth of Protestant Theology,»
Christendom, II, 1 (Winter 1937), 110 - 125; Randolph Cramp Miller, «Theology In Transition,» The Journal of Religion XX, 2 (April 1940), 160 - 168; Eugene W. Lyman, The
Meaning and Truth of Religion (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1933), 269 - 283.
Bishops hold the rank of sovereign princes, and the temporal and spiritual power of the first bishop of
Christendom renders him somehow the arbiter of kings («arbiter of kings»
means that the pope was higher than the Emperor, and thus the actual temporal ruler of the whole world) and the fourth person of the Divinity («person of Divinity»
means that the pope really presumes to be on a level with God).
When we take over Paul's theology of the cross without exegeting our context, this theology, originally conceived as a
means of harnessing power for the sake of others, becomes a rationalization of our powerlessness, our spiritlessness — the jaded, enervated religious malaise of twilight
Christendom.
Truth sets you free and I
mean a truth that sheds the light on all of the watered down teachings of
christendom.
Muslims can not be counted as worshiping «the only true God», for they fail to use his personal name, Jehovah, but use the Aramaic word Allah,
meaning «the God» and are as mixed with the «world» and violence as are the churches of
Christendom and Jews, not having» beaten their swords into plowshares and spears into pruning shears» whereby «nation will not lift sword against nation, neither will they learn war anymore».
It
means that the culture of this and other nations rather than the reality of
Christendom is becoming the conditioning frame of reference for the Protestant church.
At least in many parts of
Christendom the quest for
meaning, the revival of historic religious convictions about man's nature and destiny, about his lostness and his salvation, and the need to realize the significance of these convictions in relation to contemporary world and life views, have led to a renewal of the theological endeavor.
We need to examine what we
mean by Christian civilization, or «
Christendom», a word often used as a synonym.
In the case of
Christendom, the «autonomous world of
meaning and existence» was supplied by the complex of myths, goals and values of the religious tradition we now call Christianity.
Thus the «Christian west» is today very different from the «autonomous world of
meaning and existence», which it was when known as
Christendom.
By the term «conventional Christianity» van de Pol did not
mean the Christianity of the first three or four centuries, but rather Christianity as it was believed and has been practiced since the Christianization of Europe; that is, since the formation of
Christendom.
This amalgam of Israelite prophetic zeal and the more abstract concepts of Greek philosophy constituted the belief system that provided
Christendom with its «autonomous world of
meaning and existence».
The very fact that our present is so detached from its past, from
Christendom, with its corollary that an acceptance of the present demands a negation of
Christendom, of the Christian God, can
mean that the horizon of our present will open into a future epiphany of faith that will draw all things into itself.
Without doubt theology must abandon
Christendom, and, as we have already seen,
Christendom may well include all the
meaning which the word «Christian» carries to our ears.
Western
Christendom at the turn of the first millennium, however, may have been the first society to give historical
meaning to «progress» by undertaking great social enterprises terminating only at a horizon of unguessable distance.
And all the while the
meaning of a
Christendom organized for justice and fraternity, for the piety which enfranchises the individual and liberates society, was unfolding before their eyes.
It was God who discovered the doctrine of the God - Man, and now
Christendom has got the thing turned topsy - turvy and imputes to God consanguinity, so that the concession God has made
means pretty much what in these times it
means when a king grants a freer constitution — and one knows well enough what that
means, «He pretty well had to.»
He later devoted a number of chapters and essays to such themes as: «The Destiny of the Jewish People» (in On the Philosophy of History, 1957); «Judaism» and «The Iniquitous Lot Inflicted on Jews in
Christendom» (in On the Church of Christ); and «The Christian
Meaning of the Story of the Crucifixion» (Jewish Frontier, 1944, reprinted in The Range of Reason, 1952).
I
mean only that in fact those first engaged in constructing Enlightenment beliefs were socialized in
Christendom.
This
means that women participated along with the men in the very first conclave of
Christendom.