Boethius... thx for yr reply... I don't think it's that simple to say that» they got that from reading ancient documents incorrectly»... the specifically
Christian apocalyptic thinking that has survived in various theologies, whether traditionally Catholic or the most horrific end time sect appears to have it's roots in both the old and new testaments, but that begs a question.What are those documents?
Not exact matches
An inevitable temptation of
Christian theology, and particularly so in our own time, has been to
think that the idea or symbol of an actual end of the world was no part of the original proclamation of Jesus, and rather derived either from the
apocalyptic religious world that so dominated Jesus» disciples or from the all - too - human or fleshy component of their minds and hearts, which was impervious to the higher call of the Spirit.
There are some, though it is a minority position among New Testament scholars, who
think that the
apocalyptic passages attributed to Jesus were interpolations of early
Christian thought.
The concept of nature as evil and alien to humanity began basically in late
apocalyptic and gnostic
thought in the
Christian era.
Sometimes this was from the angle of the principles of
Christian ethics believed to be derived from it, and again it centered on the attempt to explore the relations of
apocalyptic to prophetic
thought in the message of Jesus.
«Listener to the
Christian message, «2 occasional preacher, 3 dialoguer with biblical scholars, theologians, and specialists in the history of religions, 4 Ricoeur is above all a philosopher committed to constructing as comprehensive a theory as possible of the interpretation of texts.5 A thoroughly modern man (if not, indeed, a neo-Enlightenment figure) in his determination to
think «within the autonomy of responsible
thought, «6 Ricoeur finds it nonetheless consistent to maintain that reflection which seeks, beyond mere calculation, to «situate [us] better in being, «7 must arise from the mythical, narrative, prophetic, poetic,
apocalyptic, and other sorts of texts in which human beings have avowed their encounter both with evil and with the gracious grounds of hope.
Not only does God as the transcendent
Christian God die to himself in Altizer's
thought, but Christ dies completely to any individual personality and continues only as the universally immanent dynamism (which Altizer names the Incarnate Word), which gradually converges everything dialectically toward
apocalyptic identification.
It is to be remarked that when, at last, the way was open for
Christians to become potently effective in the affairs of state and society, not all the
apocalyptic ideas in their scriptures or in their current
thinking prevented their acceptance of the responsibility.
This development began long before
apocalyptic hopes were dreamed of; it passed through days when they were a ruling category in
Christian thinking to later days when in wide areas of the church the old Jewish forms of expectation were sublimated, spiritualized, and explained away.
It has been mainly at times of cultural change and social crisis, however, that
apocalyptic beliefs and millennialism have been revived in
Christian thought and practice.
It is now acknowledged that much of the New Testament was written within a context of
apocalyptic or eschatological
thought, in which the early
Christian movement looked towards the imminent end (eschaton) of the present age and the breaking in of the new age (the Kingdom of God).
It is to be remembered that Christianity began with an
apocalyptic proclamation of the end of history, one which dominated the earliest
Christian communities, and one which was renewed at each of the great crises or turning points of
Christian history, just as it was renewed in each of our great modern political revolutions, and equally if not more deeply renewed in the advent of our deepest modern
thinking and imaginative vision.