Or is modern apocalypticism a genuine recovery and renewal of an original
Christian apocalypticism, one which had perished or become wholly transformed in the victory of an ancient Christian orthodoxy, then only to be renewed in profoundly subversive and heretical expressions?
I was talking to these churchmen about apocalyptic and I did this liberal arts, comparative, secular review of the Book of Daniel, the Book of the Apocalypse, and he was wrong and these people and Montanus, they were wrong, on and on and on and on; four days of listening to these wrong prophecies that described the history of
Christian apocalypticism.
... Nothing will ever end
Christian apocalypticism, especially now, with literacy at the high level it is.
Not exact matches
Now even as ancient Jewish
apocalypticism profoundly challenged the orthodox guardians of the Torah, a challenge which is profoundly renewed in Paul, modern
apocalypticism profoundly challenges
Christian orthodoxy.
Commenting on this same text, Gordon D. Kaufman remarks: «If, now, we bring a different framework of interpretation from Jewish
apocalypticism to this critical event in which
Christian faith was born — as we must — we should not be overly surprised or dismayed when we find it necessary to understand the character of the event somewhat differently from the first
Christians.»
Furthermore, whatever our aesthetic and theological misgivings about the Left Behind phenomenon, we do the
Christian community no favors by failing to take an honest and sympathetic look at the underlying
apocalypticism to which such novels respond.
Apocalypticism (which had arisen in Judaism rather late in its history) post Exile, was one of the major influences on the new (
Christian) cult: None of them were really meant to be read literally.
It should be welcomed for its positive teaching and as a corrective to the sundry
apocalypticisms to which
Christians, including Catholics, in this country are prone.