Niebuhr affirmed that
the Christian doctrine of salvation by grace was the only cure for original sin.
Not exact matches
They noted the «increasing departure from the basis
of the WCC» — which they defined as primarily to restore unity to the Church — and cited «a growing departure from biblically based
Christian understandings»
of the Trinity,
salvation, the gospel, the
doctrine of human beings as created in the image
of God, and the nature
of the church.
If you believe that
Christian doctrine is essentially an attempt to capture dimensions
of human experience that defy precise expression in language because
of personal and cultural limitations, then the truth about God, the human condition,
salvation, and the like can never be adequately posited once and for all; on the contrary, the church must express ever and anew its experience
of the divine as mediated through Jesus Christ.
Furthermore, if the
Christian teachings regarding
salvation and necessity
of accepting Jesus as your Savior is so critical, why have the vast majority
of the worlds religions not contained that
doctrine?
Jesus came to rid the world
of ritual so belief in Jesus dying for your sins as a way to
salvation is anti
Christian doctrine.
Much
of what the west has long taken for granted is now disappearing: the security provided by Christendom; the
Christian way
of interpreting reality; the confidence that the
Christian path leads to eternal
salvation; and the belief that
Christian doctrine embodies the essential and unchangeable truths by which to live.
Such a confrontation is needed to help neo - or post-Pentecostal
Christians discern the difference between legitimate empowerment by the Holy Spirit and an individualistic
doctrine of salvation.
The mentality that Rauschenbusch deployed to seduce his readers — the turn away from troubling debates about
doctrine, the shift from personal
salvation to social reform, and the reassurance that progressive disdain for traditional religion was in fact a sign
of a more authentic and scientific faith — provided a way to remain
Christian while setting aside whatever seems incompatible with modern life.
A study
of Beliefs That Count will provide a fine opportunity for rethinking our basic
Christian beliefs in regard to such
doctrines as God, Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit, man, the Bible, the meaning
of sin and
salvation, the kingdom
of God, and eternal life.
Such conflicts provoke renewed inquiry into the Koran's puzzling and apparently contradictory attitudes toward
Christians and Jews, the «People
of the Book»: Muslims are told in the same surah («The Table»), virtually in the same breath, that
Christians and Jews will attain
salvation by following their own religion, but that if they deviate from true Koranic
doctrine they are subject to earthly punishment and eternal damnation.
Consider this one:
Christians might think that the dynamics
of grace and faith in human
salvation could only be worked out in Christianity — until they learn, for example, about the intricate, debates between the «cat
doctrine» and the «monkey
doctrine» in Bhakti Hinduism.
Some speak in individual terms
of the cultivation
of the
Christian life or the
salvation of souls; others state their goal to be the building up
of the corporate life
of the Church or
of some part
of it; again the goal is defined as the «communication
of the vital and redeeming
doctrines of Scriptures,» or it is otherwise described by reference to the Bible as the ultimate source
of all that is to be taught and preached.
He explores four
doctrines the affirmation
of which define «boundaries»
of Christian faith: sin and
salvation, biblical revelation, the Trinity, Christology, and then describes the ethical outgrowth
of accepting these
doctrines: piety, polity, policy and program.
There was no longer consensus on the
doctrines of the church, the priesthood, the sacraments and the mode
of Christian salvation.
What is really involved here is the understanding
of the
doctrine «extra ecclesiam nulla salus» (outside the Church there is no
salvation) by the Portuguese and St. Thomas
Christians, respectively.
Martin begins with Rahner and in particular his
doctrine of the «anonymous
Christian» who, while with no explicit faith, «accepts himself completely» and finds
salvation through that acceptance.
The former, he said, were characterized by adherence to the great
doctrines that
Christians had always deemed essential for
salvation, plus (although he did not use this terminology) explicit individual apprehension
of the faith through a conversion experience.