If we completely ignore all the evidence we have that supports evolution, just pretend fossils don't exist, just pretend the Earth is only 6k years old and we were created by a higher being, where does it show it was
the Christian god character that did it?
Not exact matches
If, as many
Christians, Jews and even Muslims believe, they are carved on stone by the very finger of
God, and no other writings of such
character were commited to stone by Him, then it follows that these Commandments are to be permanent and binding, not temporary.
and apologies to all the pagans that had their spring fertility festival stolen by the
christians with the blatantly copied story from other previous cultures of the death and 3 days later resurrection of their
god character.
If a fictional
character such as
god had that power he'd not let so many
Christians die at such a young age.
I have no doubts that
Christians love this
character God, but the question here is whether it can be proved that this
character is actually real.
There is actually a turning point where a
Christian no longer has that
character flaw and is forever thankful to
Gods grace.
Yes, in the case of
character flaws, it's much easier for a
Christian to claim that
god made them that way to serve a particular purpose in the body of Christ or that
god will forgive their sins.
So, I began to study Calvinism and am flabbergasted that
Christians can actually believe
God has the kind of
character that would send innocent people to hell.
I'm sorry, «Jeff», but there has never been another mythological
character interpreted in as many contradictory ways as the
Christian «
God», therefore your assertion is a falsehood.
Well then I have to hope that «
god» is a loving
god and not the
Christian god that care more about being worshiped than the
character of his subjects.
To me it is obvious that Jesus, as the
character in the bible, was basically modelled after the Buddha, mcuh of his teaching is in the bible, so «
christians» are actually pseudo-buddhists wth a
god element thrown in so they can still use
god to frighten people with.
So, too, the
christian god is a
character in a story.
If praise extols the excellence of another, and if praise is the heart of
Christian worship, then worship is secularized when the focus shifts from the
character of
God to the enhancement of ourselves, when theocentrism is replaced by anthropocentrism, however much talk of
God remains.
It is time to emphasize the special
character of
Christian marriage and
Christian burial as these crucial passages are celebrated in the context of
God's acts in the church.
It helps
Christians to see the difference between what
God can do and what they believe it is in the
character of
God to do.
I believe they would see the former as corrupted with certain gnostic beliefs that slander
God's
character and make Him out to be a liar, while the latter would be seen as so corrupted by paganism that it basically boils down to rude idolatry sprinkled with certain
Christian beliefs.
Christians believe that in the Man Jesus there is a placarding before men of the reality of
God's
character, his love, and his action in the world.
Violence is inevitable, but so far as concerns society it has the same
character as the universally prevailing law of gravitation, which is not in any way an expression of
God's love in Christ or of
Christian vocation.
In
God, the Creator - Father, and in Christ, the revelation of the divine
character, the first
Christians fervently believed, but all this became inward and empowering only when the Spirit entered and possessed them.
If
Christians could come to see that we can not understand the saving work of
God within us, the incarnation of
God in the world, the presence of the Holy Spirit, or the
character of the
Christian life apart from a doctrine of mutual indwelling that is irreconcilable with atomistic individualism and all its works, we could have powerful leverage to liberate us from oppressive canalizations of thought and practice.
Newt's feet are made of clay too, and
character is important, but his past and
Christian - born - again life is between him and
God, not us.
Since, as well as before my change, my theological thinking centers and has centered in its emphasis upon the majesty of
God, the eschatological
character of the whole
Christian message, and the preaching of the gospel in its purity as the sole task of the
Christian church.
The Bible, as
God's word, reveals
God's moral
character and it shapes the morality of the
Christian.
Christians, on the other hand, believe that
God desires to reveal himself, and would contend that the fact that humans are made in the image of
God (Gen. 1:27), even if fallen, provides some basis for some understanding of his
character.
So, said the old theologians,
God is one «substantia,» one essence and being, but in
Christian experience he appears in three «personae,» plays three parts, unveils himself to his children in three
characters — Father - Creator; Christ the Revealer; the Spirit, our indwelling Friend and Comforter.
(«The saints» is one of the recurrent designations of
Christians, meaning, not persons of perfect
character, but members of a community consecrated to
God, e.g. I Corinthians 1:2, 3:17, cf. Acts 20:32).
The fact that
Christian thought has sometimes been tempted to revert to a doctrine of
God more mythological in
character than that of Israel, should not hide from us the direction in which the testimony of Israel was heading.
we may legitimately maintain that the
Christian way, with its incipient ecclesial
character, was founded by the revelatory promise that came to expression in him and his proclamation of the reign of
God.
But as we attempt to understand the
character of
Christian existence in the primitive community, the decisive point is that the personal
God was known as inwardly present without loss of the sense of responsible personhood.
Christians are agreed that Christ must be the norm of our human life as well as the revelation of the
character of
God.
I am a believer in
God, and it embarrasses me to see people who claim to have faith do something like this, for
Christians already have a bad rep. I have many friends with different beliefs and I don't go trying to shove mine down their throat - what matters is a person's
character, and I know wonderful people who are atheists.
There has been much controversy on life after death, hell, the existence of
God, the «right religion», the laws of
God, the
character of
God,
Christians, and much more.
About 60 per cent are members of churches, but though only
God knows how many of these are real
Christians, it seems certain that
Christian character in any thoroughgoing sense is a much greater rarity.
The Fault in Our Stars affirms a
Christian perspective; the
characters have unresolved but hopeful conversations about the afterlife, and are comfortable with the language of
God and Jesus.
Yet belief in
God, even as assent of the mind, is not irrelevant to
Christian character.
For
God is the center of the
Christian world view and the
Christian world view ultimately takes its shape and
character from the nature of
God.
At the very threshold of
Christian character stands belief in
God as that faith comes to us through Jesus Christ.
Our ways are not His ways... for dealing with things... I think your purpose for stating this, would be to have
Christians question
God's
character... am I correct?
Though the details of
Christian living are not neatly charted for us in the Sermon on the Mount or elsewhere, we are left in no doubt as to the type of
character and action which
God as seen in Jesus requires of us.
«Glee» may feature a gay couple (Kurt and Blaine), a lesbian couple (Santana and Brittany), and a transgender
character (Unique), but it also includes the
God Squad, a group of
Christians that meet in school and struggle with the demands of their faith.
But after years of work on the poetic, metaphorical nature of religious language (and hence its relative, constructive and necessarily changing
character), and in view of feminism's critique of the hierarchical, dualistic nature of the language of the Jewish and
Christian traditions, my bonds to biblicism and the Barthian
God loosened.
For the present, however, the point is that the quality of the Spirit, and hence our criterion for knowing whether any given spirit is indeed to be linked with the Spirit of
God, is for
Christians the congruity which that spirit does, or does not, possess with what we have learned of
God,
God's
character and purpose and manner of operation, through Jesus Christ in his revelation of the divine nature and agency in the world.
Jeremy — I do believe that you are correct in observing that most
Christian churches do not have the proper understanding of
God's
character.
The formal designation can be made easily enough: When we refer to «Jesus Christ,» we are referring to the historical reality about which we were thinking in the preceding chapter — the reality from which the
Christian community took its beginning and by which the continuing
character of that community has been determined, the reality in and through which the revelation of
God, known within the church, took place.
Because preaching presses for a
God - determined and Christ - realized ethicality, and because the gift of grace whereby this possibility is bestowed is ensconced in a holy story, the
character of
Christian preaching is a unique kind of discourse.
Therefore, it is most congenial to the Judeo -
Christian sense for the non-spatial
character of
God.
Process philosophers complain that the dominant philosophical models used in
Christian theology employ static metaphysical categories like «being,» «substance» and «attribute» rather than a more dynamic conceptual structure that captures the dynamic
character of the Bible's revelation of
God.
Does the Body of Christ (the American Church) have an obligation to ignore Tony's «Debacle» (an attention - getting debate being staged) and try to draw Tony and the
Christian community back into the deeper issues of lack of
character, inability to honor
God's authorities, abuse of financial power, church blindness, and using church events as a smoke - screen for evil actions?»
If there is anything decisive for faith in
Christian revelation, it is the unsurpassably self - sacrificing
character of the
God who becomes manifest in Christ.
It is of paramount importance
Christians portray accurately the
character of the
God of the Bible to the world; even more so to fellow believers.