Sentences with phrase «christian orthodoxy»

All this needs to be made clear, for the word «heaven» appears a good deal more in the New Testament than in the Old Testament, and there is a strong tendency for readers to assume that it means there what later Christian orthodoxy meant by the term, namely, an eternal spiritual sphere above this world where the faithful departed live with God.

Why is Christian orthodoxy disintegrating?

That Polkinghorne seems only to make use of his scientifc background for anecdotes and metaphors and then takes signifcant false turns in terms of Christian orthodoxy and coherent metaphysics is disappointing.

Evangelicalism, as I define it, is a renewal movement within historic Christian orthodoxy with deep roots in the early Church, the Reformation of the sixteenth century, and the great awakenings of the eighteenth century (and it includes puritanism, pietism, and pentecostalism, as well as fundamentalism).

Sadly, Christian orthodoxy has often been guilty of suppression and persecution in its attempt to preserve the truth of Christianity.

Christian orthodoxy typically accepted both philosophy and revelation and argued for their compatibility.

Seen in a broader context, this new call for Baptist catholicity is part of a deeper Protestant impulse to reclaim the foundations of historic Christian orthodoxy.

Today, however, Islam seems to have adopted the worst aspects of Christian orthodoxy and we can see how the people suffer under their repression.

Thus, I'm opposed to theologians who advocate Gaia worship (which, for the uninitiated, means substituting feminist ideology for the apostolic tradition as the touchstone of Christian orthodoxy), but I don't think there's the remotest need to worry that they'll have any influence over the future of Christianity.

By calling for a least - common - denominator public faith, Barton seems happy to settle for less than the God of historic Christian orthodoxy.

Aquinas thus established a new norm for Christian orthodoxy, and by the Reformation the world view derived largely from Aristotle had become firmly entrenched as Christian dogma and the Bible was interpreted in the light of it.

It didn't matter that the majority of Liberty students and faculty would consider Beck's Mormonism to be outside the bounds of Christian orthodoxy or that Beck had a reputation for sowing discord, what mattered was that he shared their conservative voting habits.

The majority of Chesterton's best apologetic writing begins with his arrival at the place his journey finally came to an end, that is with Christian orthodoxy «as understood by everybody calling himself Christian until a very short time ago».

But the great achievement here is that evangelicalism affirms a scripturally grounded conceptual framework that is shared by all who lay claim to historic Christian orthodoxy, thereby providing common points of reference for the continuing and candid engagement of our agreements and disagreements.

It does not claim to be exhaustive of or coextensive with historic Christian orthodoxy.

It is not surprising that the advent of Darwin's theory of evolution should have caused such consternation in Christian circles, for it removed what appeared to many to be an indispensable pillar of the whole building of Christian orthodoxy.

Such a dismissive attitude toward Christian orthodoxy, fueled by a supposed adherence to «biblical literalism,» is an obstacle to genuine unity in the Body of Christ.

The leaven of the Christian heritage now began to penetrate further than either Protestant or Catholic realized, and in forms which could not readily be evaluated by the traditional canons of Christian orthodoxy.

This means that any contemporary wager upon the Christ of Christian orthodoxy must be willing to forfeit all the life and movement of a world and actuality that has negated or dissolved the Christian God.

Yet the Apostle Paul, though reasoning calmly with the philosophers at Athens and with the ruling authorities on trial, issued thundering anathemas against the false teachers who came to the Galatian church as spokesmen for Christian orthodoxy.

Moreover, the driving force of Christian orthodoxy and spiritual energy today is not white.

With the pretext of a deeper understanding of reality, Latin American theologians reinterpret the Christian message and they separate themselves from Christian orthodoxy The Instruction says that is impossible to separate Marxist analysis from Marxist ideology.

That is, it is easier to propose that the trinitarian God of Christian orthodoxy is a structured society of three personally ordered societies of actual occasions than to think of three persons as somehow coexisting within the one ever - concrescing transcendent actual entity in Whitehead's scheme.

The present growing schism between the remnants of Christian orthodoxy and the secular world is a false one, which can lead both to ruin.

And it quickly becomes clear that Hedges» real target isn't Dominionism but any form of Christian orthodoxy ¯ and any orthodox Christian active in politics.

While his detractors are legion, it is clear that he worked within the mainstream of Christian orthodoxy and the tradition from the Church Fathers to the medieval era to the Protestant world of his own day.

The problem with this blog is that LGBTQ advocates, encouraged by the lead author have attempted to redefine the Bible to accept LGBTQ marriage and coitus as Christian Orthodoxy... unfortunately it falls short.

But from the time of the Protestant Reformation, and more particularly over the last 200 years, criticism of Christian orthodoxy has grown.

To understand the demise of Christian orthodoxy we must turn to four particular areas that are vulnerable to what have been called the corrosive acids of modernity — that is, the church, the Bible, the person of Jesus Christ and the reality of God.

The Bible, the church, Jesus Christ and God have all lost their absoluteness in modern times, and the attempt of the guardians of Christian orthodoxy to restore any of them to the pillars from which they have fallen becomes only a new form of idolatry.

This Jesus Christ stands at the center of Christian tradition and is the foundation of Christian orthodoxy.

In the fifth century Christian orthodoxy formally rejected something rather like this interpretation of the divinity of Jesus, labeling it the Nestorian heresy; but I think it has much to teach us.

What became Christian orthodoxy was largely hammered out by debate in the ecumenical councils of the first few centuries, sometimes using concepts of Greek thought used by non-Christian philosophers.

Naturally many Christians regard this extreme form of the contemporization of the Christian faith as such a radical departure from Christian orthodoxy as to be something quite different, and perhaps they are right.

More latterly a succession of voices from within the Christian tradition itself has warned that Christian orthodoxy is coming to an end.

The understanding of God as the supreme personal being has been basic to Christian orthodoxy from the beginning.

Of course there is much more to Christian orthodoxy than these four pillars, but they do support a system of thought which, within the cultural context of its time, was both impressive and convincing.

It is true that the Reformation was chiefly concerned with a few very relevant though central issues, and that many affirmations and presuppositions of Christian orthodoxy remained undisturbed.

And this brings us to the fourth and ultimate foundation of Christian orthodoxy — the being of God.

Many recognized that if his interpretation of the Gospels were true, then Christian orthodoxy had no future.

But Greenblatt sees Othello as the victim of another aspect of Western Civilization, the tension between «erotic intensity» and «Christian orthodoxy.»

Christians committed to the historic doctrines of Christian orthodoxy rejected this theological position.

He forthrightly describes Intelligent Design thought as depicting God as «closer to a super-engineer... than the personal and loving Creator that stands at the centre of Christian orthodoxy... a disinterested deity whose main function seems to be to leave enigmatic calling cards.»

The revelation in Christ, in any sense in which either our experience or really primitive Christian doctrine confirms it, is not most truly represented by the statement that Jesus Christ was God, as certain types of later Christian orthodoxy have tried to say it, nor yet by the modern liberal view that Jesus was a picture of God, showing us «what God is like.»

Since the end of World War II, however, there have been alarming signs that it is not just Christendom that is vanishing and not just Christian orthodoxy which is disintegrating.

Further, they mean that some Mormon teachings are so far outside Christian orthodoxy of past centuries that they constitute almost a new religion.

If Christian civilization is no more, if Christian orthodoxy is disintegrating and if Christian Modernism has failed to rescue it, where does this leave Christianity?

Meeting the Open Letter on its own ground There are three related beliefs which are profoundly relevant both to the Open Letter's presentation of the call to love God and to Christian orthodoxy: God's transcendence of creation, a certain reaching out on the part of God to us and the existence of the human soul.

Dr. Geering discusses the demise of Christian orthodoxy in four areas particularly vulnerable to «the corrosive acids of modernity:» 1.

Thus, if it is true, as has been claimed, that the idea of Christendom and the doctrines of Christian orthodoxy, were not at all what the historical Jesus had in mind when he spoke of the Kingdom of God, we should not be surprised if the continuing stream of cultural influence which he was so instrumental in re-directing should in the future manifest itself in ways very different from the conventional Christianity it later became for a period.