Not exact matches
After I became a
Christian, I dove
right into study and being active in the
church.
The Mormons got this
right, and as explained in Corinthians, the modern
christian churches have lost the principle of baptism for the dead... and ultimately lost the doctrine of a just God.
Right... because the good christian right would much rather have a man whose church supported polygamy, believe that Jesus popped over to the US after the resurrection, and will return again in Miss
Right... because the good
christian right would much rather have a man whose church supported polygamy, believe that Jesus popped over to the US after the resurrection, and will return again in Miss
right would much rather have a man whose
church supported polygamy, believe that Jesus popped over to the US after the resurrection, and will return again in Missouri.
Of course, the government has taken on this human responsibility because the
churches — filled with the
Christian Right — have failed abysmally in following Christ's exhortations regarding taking care of the needy.
Most
churches and
Christian organisations oppose the
right to die, saying man does not have the
right to end life prematurely, and because states should help people to live - not to die.
If you mean time to worship your god in your
churches, homes, and
Christian gatherings, this
right is already yours.
I went to a program the Catholic
Church has called The
Right of
Christian Initiation (RCIA for short).
Release International is an advocacy movement on behalf of the persecuted
church, formerly known as
Christian Mission to the Communist World which is part of the International
Christian Association, a global alliance of fifty ministries working among the persecuted
church These organisations will often urge readers to write to their MP or the appropriate ambassador to register concern at the way human
rights are being flouted.
However, I do wish the curators had done the
right thing and chosen not to include the cross, which could easily have been placed outside one of the countless
Christian churches in that neighborhood.
Madison, a Deistically - influenced
Christian who, along with his family, helped establish the Anglican
church in the U.S., saw many of this goals for government attained with the ratification of the Consti.tution and the Bill of
Rights.
Imagine a day where
christians respect the
rights and views of others and actually leave religion in their
churches.
If The
Christian Right kept there beliefs at home, in the
church and up kept separation of
church and state, no one would have a problem or care.
@chris, that is my conclusion from my upbringing in the
church and many interactions with many
Christians including people
right here on this blog.
I see no reason why
church leaders should cease promoting
Christian understandings of human
rights in public settings as a way of promoting justice, morality, and the common good.
You're
right about one thing — there are worthy and the unworthy in the
Christian churches.
«Once again, expressions of
Christian faith that honor the
rights of women to choose their own health care options and what happens to their bodies are not seen or heard,» wrote the Rev. Barbara Kershner Daniel, who pastors the Evangelical Reformed United
Church of Christ of Frederick, Maryland, in a message that she circulated via email.
@Shelley, The typical
right wing
Christian sexual ethic promoted in most evangelistic
churches is MAN MADE.
Again and again, Charles hammered home the point that it is not necessary to oppose gay civil
rights on
Christian principle; but it is necessary to show love and acceptance, because the
church has the responsibility of welcoming and sharing the good news of Jesus Christ with all people.
If a gay person wants to get married in a
church by a priest or pastor, the gay
rights trumps the
Christian doctrine.
Speaking of being open - minded, if the
church (including the
Christian extremists) were open - minded, why do they bother trying to denounce and use the government to insure gays don't have the same
rights as others?
Obama is a
Christian and his actions as president are very much in line with the teaching of the new testament, yet I couldn't dare say that at my Evangelical
church where the ACA has literally saved the life of our pastors child but here is so much hate for Obama it's down
right scary.
Some more: St. Paul says in Romans, the
Christian Church (the heavenly Israel) has no
right to turn up her nose at the earthly Israel (descendants of Jacob).
Heck, I'd even make a safe bet that there are hundreds... thousands of
Christians,
right here in the US, attend
Church every Sunday, etc, and don't believe in god, heaven or hell.
Churches are often a good place to bully because «good»
Christians are supposed to be open to being «taught» and «corrected», which to a bully means they have the
right to make others think and do as the bully directs.
Don't you find it difficult to say Obama is a Muslim at the same time you criticize him for belonging to a
Christian church that's not
right wing?
If we all, as
Christians, just got that
right, the world wouldn't be able to resist the
Church.
-- like the Republican evangelicals who all think their
church is the most
Christian, the most
right, the only ones going to heaven yet ignore the real teachings of Jesus by judging others, ignoring charity and the needs of their community, not understanding when the Lord's Prayer begins with «Our» Father — the «Our» is not just white people.
[What] I found deeply ironic, is that if there was anyone on the planet who would understand the role of the
Church and nationalism and where that could go, I would say that I could be right in the group of top people who ought to understand that fairly well, because I'm a Christian and I wrote a book on Bonhoeffer and because I saw what happened to the Nazified German c
Church and nationalism and where that could go, I would say that I could be
right in the group of top people who ought to understand that fairly well, because I'm a
Christian and I wrote a book on Bonhoeffer and because I saw what happened to the Nazified German
churchchurch.
The new Egyptian constitution is stronger on human
rights protections and provides for the construction and renovation of
Christian churches, according to the IRF report.
Personalism and the Foundations of Human
Rights by Thomas D. Williams The Catholic University of America Press, 342 pages, $ 69.95 When the Christian churches incorporated «human rights» as a philosophy and project, did they take on an ethic that corrupts their be
Rights by Thomas D. Williams The Catholic University of America Press, 342 pages, $ 69.95 When the
Christian churches incorporated «human
rights» as a philosophy and project, did they take on an ethic that corrupts their be
rights» as a philosophy and project, did they take on an ethic that corrupts their best....
• «What is the biblical view and
Christian experience of the operation of the Holy Spirit, and is it
right and helpful to understand the work of God outside the
Church in terms of the doctrine of the Holy Spirit?»
The two
churches aren't alone: dozens of
Christian leaders have complained that even though they fulfill the requirements, the government has denied them permits, according to Human
Rights Watch World Report.
«I do notice that sometimes, like on health care, when [Obama] says it's the
right thing to do, it's him saying you love God by loving your neighbor,» says Watkins, who leads a mainline denomination called
Christian Church (Disciples of Christ).
He said when he asked Obama about how he became a
Christian, the president said he joined a
church in Chicago after becoming a community organizer, leaving Graham to speculate whether he became a
Christian for the
right motives.
Huffington Post: Louie Giglio, Atlanta Pastor Giving Benediction At Inauguration, Under Fire For Anti-Gay Sermon The Rev. Louie Giglio, the Atlanta pastor of Passion City
Church who will deliver the benediction at President Barack Obama's inauguration, is under fire for anti-gay preaching and for calling
Christians to respond to the gay -
rights movement's «aggressive agenda.»
I think you forgot the multiple crusades, the salem witch trials, the constant degredation of the jewish by the
christians and catholics up until
right after WW2 and the holocaust, or not even mentioning the iron hand of the
church during the ENTIRE dark ages, the complacency and silent approval of Hitler by the RCC, the fact that Hitler himself grew up a catholic and professed to be doing the will of god.
It was customary among the Reformers themselves to speak of a «valid» ministry as one in which «the pure Word of God is preached and the sacraments be duly administered according to Christ's ordinance» (to quote the Anglican Thirty - nine Articles, which are paralleled in other and similar «confessions»); and the history of the ministry in the
Christian Church as a whole makes it abundantly clear that «authority to preach the Word of God,» or the
right to «dispense the Word of God,» or the giving to the candidate of the
Church's recognition and authority to be «preacher of the Gospel» — all these are more or less synonymous phrases — has been an integral part of ordination.
«I wish to express my
church's sincere and joyous preparedness to cooperate as best they could with the government now ruling that had set itself that tasks of promoting the Christian education of the people, repelling ungodliness and immorality, developing readiness to make sacrifices for the common good and protecting the rights of the Church.&
church's sincere and joyous preparedness to cooperate as best they could with the government now ruling that had set itself that tasks of promoting the
Christian education of the people, repelling ungodliness and immorality, developing readiness to make sacrifices for the common good and protecting the
rights of the
Church.&
Church.»
''... the
right of holding slaves is clearly established in the Holy Scriptures, both by precept and example... Had the holding of slaves been a moral evil, it can not be supposed that the inspired Apostles... would have tolerated it for a moment in the
Christian Church.
When they struggled with the
church for power, the debate was about the
right way to organize a
Christian society.
So, the absence of sexual sins,
church attendance, and
right theology become the measure of a true
Christian.
You may not like the members of the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, you may not agree with their tenets, you may even feel you are such an expert on what makes someone a
Christian and have the
right to make the judgement on who is and who isn't, but spouting off inaccurate claims indicates no credibility, and inasmuch as Jesus said «thou shalt not bear false witness» I guess it doesn't leave you looking much like a
Christian.
Also, it seems probable that Hitler, being the great manipulator, knew that he couldn't fight the
Christian churches and their members
right off the bat.
«If the
Church does not regard Israel from a
Christian point of view,» he remarked, «if it does not recognize the theological significance of this people, having a national destiny that can be cultivated only in Zion, the
Church has no
right to pass judgment on Israel.»
Conservative
Christians are
right about one thing: public opinion has shifted on same - sex marriage (particularly within the
Church), and this means they are more likely to encounter pushback when they insist same - sex marriage ought to be illegal.
We usually focus on the content of faiths and policies in disputing groups; for example, the Catholic bishops» pastoral letters, the sermonic messages of Martin Luther King, Jr., and black
churches, Mormon doctrines about equality or inequality, New
Christian Right teachings based on revealed truths, or Jews» concepts of the land of Israel.
Yeah, because local governments all over the country tell
Christian congregations they're not allowed to build
churches or wear vestments in public all the time,
right?
Of course this is just another case where you think your
church has it
right, and all other
Christians who don't hold the same view are wrong.
It was the Catholic
Church that launched National
Right to Life and the rhetoric of Jerry Falwell that compelled
Christians across the nation to keep abortion at the forefront of their agenda.
We can not of course go more closely here into the question why the
Church has the
right and duty, not only to promulgate and inculcate the precepts of immutable divine law and to supervise its observance, but on its own initiative to go beyond this and lay down positive legal prescriptions, and impose obedience to them as a
Christian's duty, although they are enacted with full consciousness that they are not necessarily eternally valid but can be changed and even abolished.