Last half term we learnt about
the Christian story of Creation, where it is found in the bible and how God wants us to look after the Earth.
By contrast,
the Christian story of creation by a good God and of humanity's fall into sin is able to make sense of why people are capable of both love and evil.
Not exact matches
There are more
stories out
of the bible that have been proven impossible and or wrong by science than have been shown to have any credibility... Of course I'm talking about actual science... not that christian science and creation «science»... which use scientific sounding things and jump to ridiculous unjustifyable conlusions, or that create incorrect premises and then make up answers to suit the question
of the bible that have been proven impossible and or wrong by science than have been shown to have any credibility...
Of course I'm talking about actual science... not that christian science and creation «science»... which use scientific sounding things and jump to ridiculous unjustifyable conlusions, or that create incorrect premises and then make up answers to suit the question
Of course I'm talking about actual science... not that
christian science and
creation «science»... which use scientific sounding things and jump to ridiculous unjustifyable conlusions, or that create incorrect premises and then make up answers to suit the questions.
Chris: Darwin was fearful
of his big idea because he still believed in the existence
of the
Christian god, and was extremely uncomfortable coming up with something that went against a literal interpretation
of the
creation story (I think.
William Buckland, Charles Lyell, Louis Agassiz, and Adam Sedgewick were all 19th century
Christian geologists who originally set out to prove the
story of creation and Noah's Flood.
Suffice it to say that nobody believe the Bible
story of creation except
Christians (and fundamentalist Jews and Muslims, to the extent they share the same mythology).
The
Christian God has taken up everything into Himself; all the treasures
of ancient wisdom, all the splendor
of creation, every good thing has been assumed into the
story of the incarnate God, and every stirring towards transcendence is soon recognized by the modern mind — weary
of God — as leading back towards faith.
Evolution does not deny the existence
of the
Christian God or the
story of creation described in the
Christian bible.
All there is to prove those things is faith in a novel to the US literal interpretation
of the
creation story in Genesis in the
Christian version
of the bible.
As you believe in evolution you can not believe the Adam and Eve
story; that right there is a massive hole in the
christian creation myth plus it is the death knoll
of the concept original sin.
You are ware that your
Christian bible borrowed the virgin birth, the resurrection, the
story of Noah and the ark, Jonah and the whale, Adam & Eve, and the
creation story from other cultures that came long before Christianity, right?
Note that the Judeo
Christian, Hindu and Buddist
creations stories do not begin with water... so what important and popular
creation story is
of relevance to you?
Once you realize the extent
of that, Vic, and our incredibly tiny place in the cosmos, then you can get a greater appreciation for just how specious and flawed and impotent the
Christian creation stories are and how feeble and inadequate the
Christian world view is.
These two competing strands
of orthodox
Christian tradition (the ontological - difference strand and the gender - as - compromise strand) both claim the Genesis
creation stories for themselves.
To tell the
Story through the language and categories
of football would in all likelihood be no less profitable than St. Paul's attempt to liken the
Christian disciple to a Roman soldier or the early missionaries» attempt to portray Christ as a divine tribal chieftain or the rock generation's
creation of Jesus Christ Superstar.
Why are you incapable
of seeing the Judeo -
Christian story for the
Creation myth that it is?
She begins with an analysis
of three Western
creation stories — Genesis, the Enuma Elish and Plato's Timeaus — and argues that the early
Christian effort to synthesize these accounts has bequeathed to us two unmanageable assumptions: that nature was originally paradisiacal and benign for human beings, and that human mortality is the product
of human sin.
Although there are some
Christians, such as the Creationists in the USA, who insist on the literal accuracy
of the biblical account
of creation, the majority
of Christians would now see the
stories as mythological.
In celebration
of Hans
Christian Andersen, author
of the original fairytale
of The Little Mermaid, there is a short look at The
Story Behind The
Story and a short animated film
of another
of his
creations, The Little Match Girl.
The 7P's
of Christian creation [POWER, PLAN, PURPOSE, PATTERN, PERFECT, PINNANCLE and PRESERVE] are a really helpful tool to help students think about the Genesis
creation accounts (Genesis 1 and Genesis 2), and to remember the main points
of the
stories for the exam.
A look at the different days
of creation, Adam and Eve and some problems that
Christians face if they take this
story literally.
- for Sonic's 25th anniversary last year, Iizuka received a task to deliver some sort
of product - the target was «dormant fans» who used to play the SEGA Genesis, but haven't really played any games since - Iizuka met
Christian Whitehead, which lead to the
creation of Sonic Mania - there was talk
of another port, but Iizuka thought fans would desire something new from the old games - this is the first time Iizuka partnered with a team
of devs spread across various countries - Iizuka said this team had a greater passion to create - this was in comparison to companies that set decisions on a pre-determined schedule (in meetings, etc)- the team had so many features they still wanted to add after the beta version was complete - since there were only a few spots with text that needed to be localized, they could bring the game to more places quicker - the game has Japanese, English, French, Italian, German, and Spanish support - the Studiopolis stage is included due to receiving the most requests from the Sonic Mania development team - Iizuka actually considered reducing the amount
of stages at one point in order to meet the development schedule - Sonic Mania doesn't really have much in the way
of cut content like scrapped stages - since Sonic Mania was only distributed digitally, the team was able to continue working very close leading up to launch - this let them put in practically all ideas, and there are currently no plans for DLC - Iizuka recommended Flying Battery Zone for inclusion becaues he likes the music - he also likes when the player goes inside and outside the ship - Iizuka likes Mirage Saloon because the stage structure will be different depending on the player character chosen - Puyo Puyo gameplay was added because there was a Puyo Puyo game released in the west for the SEGA Genesis - this game was originally called «Dr. Robotnik's Mean Bean Machine», and the team thought it would make a fun boss battle - Iizuka didn't have plans to feature Blue Sphere in the special stages - the Blue Sphere special stages were brought over to Mania as a test, but ended up staying for the final game - the team felt the need to continuously connect stages from various eras, which is doe with the Phantom Ruby
story - for Sonic Mania, it was decided that the technological limit would be set at SEGA CD, - this is higher than the Genesis but lower than Saturn - in creating a SEGA CD - grade special stage, they would intentionally make SEGA CD - grade polygons
Attacks on evolution come largely from conservative
Christians who believe in a literal reading
of the biblical
creation story.
McKibben's 2012 book, The Comforting Whirlwind: God, Job, and the Scale
of Creation expands on his 2005 Harpers magazine article asserting that the dominant America - as - a-
Christian-Nation view is wrong, and explores left - wing politics as the true
Christian mandate through the Biblical
story of Job.